Lauren Boebert is a hooker.

So you would agree that Trump is an incurable idiot since everyone from the DOJ and White House Counsels office along with his campaign staff and lawyers told him 1) he lost 2) he lost badly 3) he was trying to overturn a lawful election 4) there was no election fraud, etc.

You’d further agree that those on this site still claiming election fraud are incurable idiots.

You’d further agree that those on this site as well as Trump lack the back bone to admit they are wrong. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

... WHATABOUTISM - there it is!

Surely KNEW that you'd get to it sooner than later.

Thanks for living up-to me faith in you...

### Salty

... WHATABOUTISM - there it is!

Surely KNEW that you'd get to it sooner than later.

Thanks for living up-to me faith in you...

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

You’re quite welcome. Even though you clearly don’t know the meaning or what Whataboutism is. I’ve tried to explain it to you fools, to no avail.

Thry always want the truth and then when you give it to them - they can't handle it. Reminds me of that movie where Jack Nicholson is on the stand and Tom Cruise is asking him for the truth. Jack says "you want the truth? you can't handle the truth." Reminds me of the dems everytime.

So you take a cheap shot at me, and then say you're leaving? That just proves you have even less backbone than adav8!

What specifically did I say in my post #283 that was a "lie"? Originally Posted by lustylad

Thry always want the truth and then when you give it to them - they can't handle it. Reminds me of that movie where Jack Nicholson is on the stand and Tom Cruise is asking him for the truth. Jack says "you want the truth? you can't handle the truth." Reminds me of the dems everytime. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Yep, and notice how 1b1 can't answer my question either.

...you clearly don’t know the meaning or what Whataboutism is. I’ve tried to explain it to you fools, to no avail. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Well, let's try again!

1b1's definition of Whataboutism - when you argue "But but but... MY bad behavior is justified by YOUR bad behavior!"

Or to dumb down even further - 2 wrongs make a right!

Is it any wonder the dim-retards are winning this race to the bottom?

And you know this, Comerade, because... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

https://www.marieclaire.com/politics...other-gabriel/


Gabriel was the person who initially sent his sister's information to a Democratic political recruiting group (opens in new tab), per Insider, who met with AOC and encouraged her to run. Gabriel was firmly in her corner throughout her candidacy, and remains so: "I‘m the proudest Brother in the World.No Debate," he wrote on Twitter in December.

I don't think Bernie Sanders is embarrassed by AOC at all. You don't like AOC because she gets a lot of press.



bahahahahaaaaaaa. Originally Posted by adav8s28

i don't like AOC because she's a socialist idiot. i don't give a shit how much the press fawns over her. the more they do the stupider she comes off. this is the person who supposedly has a minor in economics who said unemployment was low because people were working two jobs. here she is saying that.






more from that same interview ...






no such thing as "bad press" right?

Thry always want the truth and then when you give it to them - they can't handle it. Reminds me of that movie where Jack Nicholson is on the stand and Tom Cruise is asking him for the truth. Jack says "you want the truth? you can't handle the truth." Reminds me of the dems everytime. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

You mean that movie where they convict Jack Nicholson's character because they can't handle the truth?

That movie?

Reminds of me what'll happen to your fatass savior, DJT.

Headed for Club Fed.

AOC is an attention whore!

Hello, Jack!

Don't let nobody see you what about this topic, BP.

What is this? Your crazy bitch is crazier than ours?

In this case, yours is a slut.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You just broke 56.2k, Yssup.

Now go to bed. When you wake up you will still be the only 5-time DOTY award winner in eccie history.

Remember - nobody can ever take those trophies away from you!

You are a dumbfuck saying she has male parts, shows your lack of intelligence just like all the other dumbfuck trumptards on here.

Racist trumptards on here just can't stand the fact that any blackness got even close to being in their beloved "white house"... Originally Posted by royamcr

+1

Word!

Once again, adav8 shows himself to be a lying hyper-partisan hack Originally Posted by lustylad

You and Waco kid are not hyper-partisan? You two are just a little partisan? When it comes to Obama, Waco wont even agree with his favorite economist, Kimberly Amadeo.

How did i lie? I did not write anything about the picture of her on top of a bed. (Which the CNN article said was not her). I didn't even see that picture.

I commented about the picture from the sugar daddy website. The woman in the picture has similar height, weight and body type, maybe even the same foot size. The dem superpac took it down from their website. Has it been confirmed that Bobert doesn't have any tats on her back or stomach?

I'll give you an example of a lie when a certain Trumptard posted that Obama gave GM to the Auto Workers union.

You and Waco kid are not hyper-partisan? You two are just a little partisan? When it comes to Obama, Waco wont even agree with his favorite economist, Kimberly Amadeo.

How did i lie? I did not write anything about the picture of her on top of a bed. (Which the CNN article said was not her). I didn't even see that picture.

I commented about the picture from the sugar daddy website. The woman in the picture has similar height, weight and body type, maybe even the same foot size. The dem superpac took it down from their website. Has it been confirmed that Bobert doesn't have any tats on her back or stomach?

I'll give you an example of a lie when a certain Trumptard posted that Obama gave GM to the Auto Workers union. Originally Posted by adav8s28

you keep bringing her up. interesting. you bring her up when her opinion research agrees with your agenda. i bring her up when her opinion research agrees with my agenda.


tell us who's partisan again?


bahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa


and while i can still edit this post you have yet to take the TWK economics challenge.

i challenge you to post an article about the "brilliant" stewardship of the Obama economy. for every article you can find .. i'll post two that refutes it. I'm give myself a 2 to 1 handicap .... you can't "loser" that bet ... right???


bhahahahahahaaaaaaaaa

you keep bringing her up. interesting. you bring her up when her opinion research agrees with your agenda. i bring her up when her opinion research agrees with my agenda.


tell us who's partisan again?


bahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I bring her up because she has written quite clearly that Obama's 800 billion stimulus worked. You don't want to touch that.

To your question who is partisan? Answer:

You, me and Joe Harvard (lustylad).

I bring her up because she has written quite clearly that Obama's 800 billion stimulus worked. You don't want to touch that.

To your question who is partisan? Answer:

You, me and Joe Harvard (lustylad). Originally Posted by adav8s28

then don't fold a "winning hand" and take the bet. 2 to 1 in your favor. can't lose, right?



start the thread.