PAY ATTENTION TO ME PLEASE, MY DADDY DIDN'T LOVE ME!
Originally Posted by Ansley
The only name I've called you is irrelevant. Which is 100% factual. But here's me actually engaging you instead of ignoring you, just this once - since I've promised to ignore Dorthy now.
I don't argue with you, because the basis for everything you say is a logical fallacy - specifically,
argument from authority. There's a link there for you to read about it. You keep doing this over and over. Between that and false assumption (or strawman) - which is another logical fallacy...
You are, by the very definition of the words, a failure. I can't argue with you, or debate with you, or exchange wit with you because you - BY DEFINITION - aren't intelligent enough to exchange ideas with.
Given your posting history, I assume that you won't understand what I've just written, nor will you read the link I've provided, nor do you care what an argumentative fallacy is, so let me take part of what you precisely said, and say it back to you, just changing context.
After reading your posts for the last few days, I've come to the conclusion that you are a very bitter woman. All you do is abuse and call men some horrible names. I would say that 99% of the men here would refuse to see you. With the name calling and the way you try to tell johns what to say and who to see isn't cool at all. You are new here and have no right to tell these men how to do things. I'm sure that they know what is best for their own business. At first it was kind of funny, now it's just sad.
See how absolutely asinine that sounds? You can't argue with it, because it is a logical fallacy - by definition, not an argument. Pointing this out is probably wasted time, because if you were smart enough to intelligently converse, you wouldn't be constructing such rubbish in the first place.
We both know that you're going to ignore my points, my explanation, and my advice, so at least scroll back through the last few pages to see what the other folks here have said to you. In the category of things we also both know:
-We both know you're going to respond to this.
-We both know that your response is going to be 100% ad hominem (another logical fallacy)
-We both know that the context will be "Me too, me too!"
-We both know that I'm going to go back to ignoring you.
I was just trying to give you the REASON why I'm ignoring you. It's not because you're hurtful, or I'm afraid of what you have to say - it's that you are by definition incapable of arguing with because you don't understand logic or reason. And since you're not part of Houston, nor relevant to this discussion, and if your avatar is a picture of you...also not someone I'd ever care to see...you are simply too inadequate to participate. If those were the names you were looking for me to foist on you, there they are - but they're not personal attacks, they are textbook definition adjectives that precisely fit your presentation.
Carry on.