So the Orange Clown in Chief Got Impeached.

Your deflecting isn't cutting it... Originally Posted by bb1961

can i send you a bill if i offer my professional opinion? if not, i post when and if i feel like it.

Sexist? Maybe, it depends...
Delusional? Most definitely. Hot providers are there to fuck not make sammiches. Originally Posted by boardman

a good provider fucks you well; a great provider fucks you well and makes ya a helluva ham sammich..

can i send you a bill if i offer my professional opinion? if not, i post when and if i feel like it. Originally Posted by pxmcc

Professional opinion...or professional deflection.
"i post when and if i feel like it"...I guess you haven't be "feeling" much like posting on oh2??
Oh I forgot you're PREM-BANNED!!
Just stating facts sir, I don't practice deflection...

Who said I'm a non liar?

Who said I'm a non liar? Originally Posted by boardman

u practice?

But first of all, this should have been moved to the political forum...LAST YEAR!

Darth, because of all the trolling on Eccie, i'm on sabbatical from Eccie except for this thread, which i consider a PSA.

if everyone followed the rules, this thread would be fine. we have 2 bad apples on this thread who cannot help themselves from trolling. they should either be straight up banned or at a minimum banned from this thread. i dont do the Poltical Forum because it's a food fight in there.

we've had great commentary in this thread from people i didn't even know existed such as Hyperinflation.

as a simple example of how this should work, Boardman and i disagree with each other on almost everything but we are always civil to each other. people who can't follow the rules should be banned. simple as that.

so lets see what happens with DJ and bb1961..

so lets see what happens with DJ and bb1961.. Originally Posted by pxmcc

ya well go fuck yourself too u little whiny know-nothing bitch.. Originally Posted by pxmcc

Both comments on topic as a reply when I was mentioned. Well if I make a statement like you did, then something should happen. By the way, if and when something happens to me, you will never know.

Come on, isn't about time for another one of your long winded I hate Trump diatribes? I need a good laugh.

But first of all, this should have been moved to the political forum...LAST YEAR! Originally Posted by DarthMaul

Not according to Crypt.

Political discussions have always been allowed in the sandbox. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Tebow! You modtards need to get on the same page.

boardman and i disagree with each other on almost everything but we are always civil to each other. Originally Posted by pxmcc

I don't know, "always" is pretty definitive but I try. I thinck I might have some points somewhere that suggest otherwise but I'm not sure. I seem to remember them tasting like tuna.
Anyway, the only people I'm "always" not civil to are drive-by modtards who play checkers with a bat that thinck they are playing chess...

u practice? Originally Posted by pxmcc

This is the interwebs. I practice a lot of shit

And what BM and Darth wrote is correct while CryptKicker is wrong in his statement.

Never has a political discussion been allowed in the Sandbox, it was always moved to the National Political forum which is where this thread belongs.

[QUOTE=pxmcc;1062009044]

I didn't read any of that nonsense you are spewing because it's just that...

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...of-impeachment[/QUOTE


IS THIS THE CIVILITY YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT PXMCC??

ya well go fuck yourself too u little whiny know-nothing bitch..

and get the fuck off my thread while you're at it. this is why we can't have nice things around here..

i'm sorry to hear you never learned how to read. the state of american education. smdh. Originally Posted by bb1961

This it how you started your POLITICALLY bias thread:
I want to hear from both sides but lets keep it CIVIL AND RESPECTFUL the LACK OF CIVILITY in the Political Forum makes it UNAPPEALING TO ME .)
And you are immune from the "civility" of your foul mouth comments because it's" unappealing to you "...you can dish it out but you can't take it.


You think you'll EVER address this post of BM's? I know you won't because you CAN'T!!
You're a pro at the art of deflection....your answer to BM's post:


"you made several good points...which i wont address at this time. You have nothing to address this with."


but lets say Trump commits a felony
That's the hypothetical that you're basing a conviction on? That's TDS talking. If the House had solid charges and proof they would have brought solid articles of impeachment. They didn't have anything so they tried to make it a fishing expedition. Anyone with any common sense saw through that whole debacle.



In any other felony case you have to get an indictment. That means proving the case is solid enough to take to trial(in a nutshell). The House didn't do that. They based their whole argument on a phone call.

Despite Schiff paraphrasing the whole transcript there was nothing in the transcript that came close to felonious behavior. Then they moved to a quid pro quo argument.

Despite calling several witnesses and even leading some of those into giving their opinions there was not one witness that actually said Trump wanted a quid pro quo. Bolton wasn't going to say anything different than what they already had. That's why they didn't call him but instead demanded the Senate call him. They knew the Senate wouldn't do it and opted to play it up that the Senate didn't perform a proper trial when in fact they did. It was the responsibility of the House to get all the evidence before referring the articles for trial.

Beyond that, If you read the transcript, Trump was trying to get the new Ukrainian President to investigate whether Biden used a quid pro quo to deflect heat from his son and the company his son was sitting on a BOD for. That's corruption of the highest magnitude. Trump asked them to look into it. He never said if you don't I'm withholding money but even if he had it wouldn't have been any more or less illegal than what Biden did and is on tape bragging about it. As chief law enforcement officer he has the right to ask another country to investigate something that smells fishy regarding other politicians... to investigate corruption.
That's what draining the swamp looks like. The fact that it was a potential 2020 opponent looked bad on the surface but it was far from treasonous.
There was no felony that they could even legitimately get an indictment on so there was nothing to compel testimony or further discovery. It was all a fishing expedition.

Trump may not be as polished of a politician as say Clinton was but he's every bit as smart if not smarter. That drives the left crazy. He's playing chess while they're trying to figure out if the checkers pieces go on the red square or the black.

And what BM and Darth wrote is correct while CryptKicker is wrong in his statement. Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera

That seems to happen a lot.

Never has a political discussion been allowed in the Sandbox,Until now, it was always moved to the National Political forum which is where this thread belongs. Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera

FIFY

Tebow! You modtards need to get on the same page. Originally Posted by boardman

We still have those here?....