Am I MSOG friendly?

WTF: Have you ever the saying (since you quoted Darwin, was it?) "Men think Logically, Women think Emotionally?" Originally Posted by FoxyNC

Once again making my point about giving a woman personal information that can do you irreparable harm. Once given most men with half a brain are not going to say anything negative in a review of a woman that has their personal information. Which has been my God Damn point that you two have failed to grasp. Good Lord.

I'm getting sucked in to the crazy. I'm backing away from the point and surrendering to you as the victor to save my own sanity. I know your need to "win" is much stronger than mine.

Once again making my point about giving a woman personal information that can do you irreparable harm. Once given most men with half a brain are not going to say anything negative in a review of a woman that has their personal information. Which has been my God Damn point that you two have failed to grasp. Good Lord.


Originally Posted by WTF

LOL

Just cause we (WOMEN) ARE emotional, doesn't mean WE (WOMEN) don't have any self control..... I'll hand that luggage to the men....
We (WOMEN) aren't the ones up here shopping around due to impulse control issues...



Note to self: WTF expects providers to behave like robots.
Expects not to be nice, but expects to be treated nicely.
Duly noted.

I'm getting sucked in to the crazy. I'm backing away from the point and surrendering to you as the victor to save my own sanity. I know your need to "win" is much stronger than mine. Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport

I have said you made a valid point, I have said c44 made a valid point , he has said you have made valid points....How come it is so hard for you to accept that others have valid points?

Can't we all can be right?

You can sell however you see fit.

c44 can alert his brothers in what he think are deception.

and I can point out when someone wrongly correlates no negative reviews to mean there is nothing negative to say.

Note to self: WTF expects providers to behave like robots.
Expects not to be nice, but expects to be treated nicely.
Duly noted. Originally Posted by FoxyNC

No , I expect you to be emotional...that is why I will not give you any of my personal information which you can come back and bite me on the ass.

I'm nice , I'm just not into this:



and yes I do expect to be treated nicely.

You have to love women who price MSOG into a 60 minute visit Edited by Pistolero at request of poster

I've probably stared at it for the last 10 minutes. My God is this just an insanely hot photo. Time to drive to Austin.

She has to be the hottest looking provider I've ever seen in photos, much less in person

This post has nothing to do with this thread other than I found the photo while posting in it.

I've probably stared at it for the last 10 minutes. My God is this just an insanely hot photo. Time to drive to Austin.

She has to be the hottest looking provider I've ever seen in photos, much less in person

Originally Posted by citizen44

As you said, this has no place in this thread.

What I said is that the mere fact that a woman has all your personal information would deter most gents, with half a fucking brain, from writing anything negative about those ladies who have their personal information. That is just a fact of human nature. Read up on Darwin if you do not believe me.
Originally Posted by WTF

Let's get back to the thread topic. This is not it. This is something you came up with out of the blue.

but having shit written about your innermost erotic naked self.... and reading it, can feel quite personal....

. Originally Posted by FoxyNC

Would you like to discuss where you have been reading this?

Originally Posted by boardman

I like em natural, too.
I don't dig the fake bake look myself....
^ THAT ASS.....
Back to the Lady in Question.....
Love how you haters try to "re-direct"
"Look...... SQUIRREL"....... HA!!!
I'll see your full house, with my flush...
And that derriere is FLUSH....
Haters lol

Would you like to discuss where you have been reading this? Originally Posted by Pistolero

I haven't violated any TOS....
And I have experienced from this from the ONE solo public commentary on my one solo review on here, AND..... not that this is relevant on "this site"- I have other reviews on other sites that allow ladies to read ALL of their reviews... Nothing remains hidden there. Thank God for small favors.
I don't agree (ethically) with that ROS policy here, but I am forced to "agree" and adhere to it, to participate.

I have never seen Tarheel taint ... taint is never considered "chubby."

I have never seen Tarheel taint ... taint is never considered "chubby." Originally Posted by pyramider

Technically it's JayHawk taint, but if this taint ever makes it to film, you will be the first to have it Inboxed.
Promise.

That had me

Do not be taint teasing me, young lady ...

Let's get back to the thread topic. This is not it. This is something you came up with out of the blue.


Originally Posted by Pistolero

I did not bring it up out of the blue...i responded to what i considered an inaccurate assumption. You might want to go back and reread.

All 23 pages?
I happen to agree it's on topic, butt...You're giving ole Pete quite a bit of credit in the reading comprehension and retention department ain't ya?

links?
( no more than 5)

links?
( no more than 5) Originally Posted by Pistolero

Be nice if the lady that hit the RTM button would have included it. How about it proceeds the post you quoted from me.

Are you serious about my post not being on topic? Are you serious about citizen44's post not being on topic in a thread the thread starter has admitted is a threAD? His post was so on point it must have gotten a lady pissed her threAD was being getting lost by another threAD in her own threAD!