The glory days of the HDH are over.

I get it. Originally Posted by woodyboyd

Get what? You are cloyingly, irritatingly pre-menstrual.

The HDH wants to be in the top 1 to 5% or so of escorts. That is fine, but just understand that if your business volume starts to drop it may be due to competition from the SB and lower overall male wealth. I know a lot of women may just wait it out, but I think it is wiser to be more proactive than in previous years. Originally Posted by woodyboyd

Top 1 to 5% of what? Income? Per diem rates?

My perception is that the HDHs didn't really have a "volume" to begin with, so the dwindling business volume probably isn't on the top of the HDH worry list. I don't about others, but it certainly is true for me.

If my "volume" were to drop from a handful of suitors to say none, I don't think I would do anything about it. It's really not waiting it out. As I stated in my previous post, it is my preference, and not a business model, to limit the potential pool of suitors using the mechanism of the higher price. I don't really approach the demiland as a business venture, so if my demiland hits a drought then I would just spend more time reading rather than being "proactive."

Get what? You are cloyingly, irritatingly pre-menstrual. Originally Posted by Clerkenwell

on the internet..behind the supposed anonymity it may or may not provide...we can be readily cruel and assume a certain superiority rather quickly

its not just this post..i could have picked out many

laurentius seems to take things in stride and grin in repose before responding...remarkable.

maybe this comment doesnt belong here and a new thread is warranted.

I don't really approach the demiland as a business venture, so if my demiland hits a drought then I would just spend more time reading rather than being "proactive." Originally Posted by Lovely Victoria

So this is how you get your "freak on" eh?

I met such a lady once that had a very high relative hourly rate and a 2 hour minimum. Turns out she was absolutely wild in bed and did this more for her own enjoyment than the money. She told me (on my third visit) that she just kept the rate high to "weed out the creeps".

She told me (on my third visit) that she just kept the rate high to "weed out the creeps". Originally Posted by pjorourke

No system is perfect, huh?

No system is perfect, huh? Originally Posted by Rudyard K

PJ

No system is perfect, huh? Originally Posted by Rudyard K

Okay, that one.

So this is how you get your "freak on" eh?

I met such a lady once that had a very high relative hourly rate and a 2 hour minimum. Turns out she was absolutely wild in bed and did this more for her own enjoyment than the money. She told me (on my third visit) that she just kept the rate high to "weed out the creeps". Originally Posted by pjorourke

I met a similar gem in ATL. I take with a grain of salt any gal that says, "It's really not about the money" but over time tended to believe her.

She had a solid 9 to 5 with a Fortune 500, was selective about who she would see (waiting for RK joke on how I got into the mix) & only juggled a handful of clients that would yield her about 2-3 evening dates every two weeks. If she had a client or two attrit, she'd place an ad or two and get back to the mix she wanted.

What was different about her was she wouldn't see out of towners and wanted to know that, if things went well, you were interested in becoming a regular. Although I'm sure she had not problem spending the money, she claimed it was what clarified the boundaries of the relationship.

Very similar ATL, only the one I referred to actually preferred out-of-towners -- less chance of unexpected encounters in real life. I don't think she had regulars per-se. I did introduce her to a friend and he had an equally wild experience. One particular kink was she loved semi-public sex -- where there was a chance of discovery. She actually turned on a "make up room" light so that the maid would come in.

She was "out there" -- but in an interesting way.

If my "volume" were to drop from a handful of suitors to say none, I don't think I would do anything about it. It's really not waiting it out. As I stated in my previous post, it is my preference, and not a business model, to limit the potential pool of suitors using the mechanism of the higher price. I don't really approach the demiland as a business venture, so if my demiland hits a drought then I would just spend more time reading rather than being "proactive." Originally Posted by Lovely Victoria

I agree completely. Not having volume, it isn't a concern. All I need are two or three friends. I am far more concerned about the well being or life circumstances of those specific people than I am of the general state of affairs. Really, all it takes is one guy I can get along with.

However, if I loose one of my few, I do and have adjusted to encourage new suitors, until I meet the right gent, then re-establish previous expectations.

It isn't so much a matter of the macrocosm as the microcosim.

2 different ladies - neither on the boards - have told me that they really only want a handful of regulars; they do accept new dates but mostly to audition potential new regulars for that time when one of their regulars drops out.