74 school shootings since Sandy Hook. More dead today.

Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 06-28-2014, 10:17 PM
Because I think most folks understand that without a driver's licence program there would be far more auto deaths, and having cars registered greatly increases the chances that an irresponsible driver will be held accountable. Neither guns nor cars will ever be made 100% safe, but guns can be made far safer--and gun owners far more accountable--than they are now.
RedLeg505's Avatar
Because I think most folks understand that without a driver's licence program there would be far more auto deaths, and having cars registered greatly increases the chances that an irresponsible driver will be held accountable. Neither guns nor cars will ever be made 100% safe, but guns can be made far safer--and gun owners far more accountable--than they are now. Originally Posted by Old-T
Reasonable controls to keep guns out of the hands of criminals or mentally ill sounds great. Its HOW those controls are designed that is the problem so far. I'd be interested in a link to ANY such plan to add controls or limits proposed by the gun control crowd, that would have stopped ANY of the 74 shootings listed in the original complaint. Got such links or proposals?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Reasonable controls to keep guns out of the hands of criminals or mentally ill sounds great. Its HOW those controls are designed that is the problem so far. I'd be interested in a link to ANY such plan to add controls or limits proposed by the gun control crowd, that would have stopped ANY of the 74 shootings listed in the original complaint. Got such links or proposals? Originally Posted by RedLeg505
So we should stop trying?
RedLeg505's Avatar
So we should stop trying? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Hey.. here's a thought Yssup.. how about.. just for a change, the anti-gun crowd suggest something that might actually.. you know.. work?

Let us know when they come up with such a suggestion, okay?
JCM800's Avatar
Reasonable controls to keep guns out of the hands of criminals or mentally ill sounds great. Its HOW those controls are designed that is the problem so far. I'd be interested in a link to ANY such plan to add controls or limits proposed by the gun control crowd, that would have stopped ANY of the 74 shootings listed in the original complaint. Got such links or proposals? Originally Posted by RedLeg505
Are you supporting gun rights for criminals and the mentally ill ...because of a lack of a reasonable proposal?

What would it matter if the "controls" were designed specifically for them?
I B Hankering's Avatar
As I keep saying, which you obviously do not understand because you are an IDIOT, it is of no importance how either you or I or Iffy or BigTex or JD interpret the 2nd Amendment. What IS important how the states and the court system interpret the 2nd Amendment. So far, I think they've done a very good job of balancing the right to bear arms with common sense. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
The court is ruling against your lib-retarded interpretation, Speedy, and that's why you find yourself under your bed sucking on your thumb.



I could agree with what a lot of gun supporters say IF they really were more concerned about keeping guns in the hands of the right people and out of the hands of the wrong people.

Registration of cars has not resulted in anyone confiscating cars.

Registration of doctors has not led to a gulag populated with doctors.

But somehow the gun Wackos--not the majoritybif gun owners--scream that "They" want to confiscate guns. Yes, there are some Anti-gun Wackos who do, but the best thing the gun supporters can do to help themselves is to have some rational self-policing.

It ain't happening real well.
Originally Posted by Old-T
Your fraud is so superficial it's not even funny, Old-Twerp. There are so many gun regulations and laws you cannot count them, Old-Twerp, and they all fundamentally state:

Thou shalt not committeth a crime -- any crime, whether it be assault, robbery, murder, etc., etc., etc. -- with a gun!
Nevertheless, Old-Twerp, those crimes are still committed. No new law that you can possibly imagine will prevent those crimes from happening, Old-Twerp, and the net result of your "new and improved" law would only serve to abridge, burden or deny the constitutional rights of the law abiding citizens, Old-Twerp. So go screw yourself, Old-Twerp.



FAGGOTS! FAGGOTS! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
cocksucker Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
homo closet queen

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
queer. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
And what also matters are 74 cases of gun violence at schools. And the fact that some gun wackos--many of whom spend way too much time on this board--keep ignoring dead bodies and ONLY want to see the "right to be lethal" side of the argument. Oh, and in some cases, spout their potty humor and homophobic vomit. Originally Posted by Old-T
Goodness gracious, look how chummy Old-Twerp the hypocrite and myopically blind jackass is getting with his LBGT, dick-licking butt-buddy: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM!




Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Yeah, that you so readily fly your LBGT banner -- with the symbol chosen by Hitler personally -- must make your mommy really proud of your sorry ass, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
The court is ruling against your lib-retarded interpretation,


. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You are the ONLY IDIOT who believes that. But I expect such statements from "The dumbest person on this board".

I B Hankering's Avatar
You are the ONLY IDIOT who believes that. But I expect such statements from "The dumbest person on this board".

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
You're having nightmares because you can't handle the truth, Speedy. That's why you keep throwing these tantrums and end up hiding under your bed, sucking on your thumb, while you quake with fear, Speedy.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
You're having nightmares because you can't handle the truth, Speedy. That's why you keep throwing these tantrums and end up hiding under your bed, sucking on your thumb, while you quake with fear, Speedy.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You're right. That's me dead on. Continue showing us your ignorance. All you have in your life is to sit behind a computer and throw insults at others. Grow up.
I B Hankering's Avatar
You're right. That's me dead on. Continue showing us your ignorance. All you have in your life is to sit behind a computer and throw insults at others. Grow up. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Aren't you the almighty hypocrite, Speedy! Either that, or you're just too damn stupid to recognize that's exactly what you're doing, jackass.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 06-30-2014, 03:35 PM
Hey IB, I see a meltdown of yours coming! You make two typical IB Irrational points:

--some people disobey laws so let's eliminate laws

--I'm IB and I never met a picture of disgusting crap that I didn't cut and paste into my private viewing library

Sure, IB, those are just brilliant comments by you.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Hey IB, I see a meltdown of yours coming! You make two typical IB Irrational points:

--some people disobey laws so let's eliminate laws

--I'm IB and I never met a picture of disgusting crap that I didn't cut and paste into my private viewing library

Sure, IB, those are just brilliant comments by you.
Originally Posted by Old-T
La-di-fuckin'-da, Old-Twerp, just another issue of your ignorant and unfounded hyperbole.

BTW, Old-Twerp, you're known by the company you keep -- and the way you keep tickling the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's balls with your commiserating and mimicking says a whole lot about you and your POV, jackass!

Take another gander at those posts by the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM: filled with images and homophobic vituperation you claim disgusts you, and then continue to prove you're a hypocrite as you keep sidling up to his disgusting ass, Old-Twerp.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
You could have doctored them, like you did all the other posts of mine that you quote. How come you never show the courage to quote complete posts, IBIdiot? Could it be that you are too cowardly to face your "fan club?"

My question is how did you manage to gather all of those self-portraits, you coprophiliac, hillbilly, GED. dropout. Are you spending your break time at the mind shaft reading old posts?

Do I need to issue a stalking warning now?

LMAO @ IBIdiot, melting down like it's July! And it is!
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Hey.. here's a thought Yssup.. how about.. just for a change, the anti-gun crowd suggest something that might actually.. you know.. work?

Let us know when they come up with such a suggestion, okay? Originally Posted by RedLeg505
How about this for a start.

If a child under the age of 18 commits a crime using the parent's firearms, the parents are held accountable for the action under the law. Might make the parents secure their weapons a little better.
One of your more stupid comments--and that is saying quite a lot.

So, you are not in favor of parental responsibility? You don't think a gun owner has a responsibility to keep their guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them?

I guess you are the degenerate psychopath you seem to be.

Thanks for admitting it.
Originally Posted by Old-T
It seems to be people who lean left or liberal democrats who are doing all the shootings and murders. According to your reasoning we should ban all liberals and democrats. Do your research and look for conservative areas and you will find that most have little to no crime. Ban liberal.... It's for the children