Ferguson, MO: Might as well start the ball rolling...

http://www.theroot.com/articles/hist...s_fiction.html

And how many of these 10.7 million Africans were shipped directly to North America? Only about 388,000. Originally Posted by gnadfly

By Creed: Come on, dude. Africans were kidnapped and dragged over here by the MILLIONS.

Your constant efforts to dismiss everything associated with the black struggle is disturbing.

I think Creed got off "THE TRACK" when he started out .... "Come on, dude"

To be quite honest, that 1.6 number sounds....ridiculous to me. It doesn't represent anything of note is why. Seriously, you think Black America was populated by the African versions of Adam and Eve? Come on, dude. Africans were kidnapped and dragged over here by the MILLIONS.

Your constant efforts to dismiss everything associated with the black struggle is disturbing. Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

If you did a little math and some reasoning that "millions" would sound pretty stupid. It has the position that slave ships must have thrown about ten Africans over the side for everyone that was delivered to the colonies. How do you make any money doing that? The slavers would have gone out of business if those numbers were true.

To be quite honest, that 1.6 number sounds....ridiculous to me. It doesn't represent anything of note is why. Seriously, you think Black America was populated by the African versions of Adam and Eve? Come on, dude. Africans were kidnapped and dragged over here by the MILLIONS.

Your constant efforts to dismiss everything associated with the black struggle is disturbing. Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

It sounds "ridiculous" to you because you have spent your whole life immersed in the lib-retarded Kool Aid that passes for modern American education.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/hist...s_fiction.html

The most comprehensive analysis of shipping records over the course of the slave trade is the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, edited by professors David Eltis and David Richardson. (While the editors are careful to say that all of their figures are estimates, I believe that they are the best estimates that we have, the proverbial "gold standard" in the field of the study of the slave trade.) Between 1525 and 1866, in the entire history of the slave trade to the New World, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.

And how many of these 10.7 million Africans were shipped directly to North America? Only about 388,000. That's right: a tiny percentage.

In fact, the overwhelming percentage of the African slaves were shipped directly to the Caribbean and South America; Brazil received 4.86 million Africans alone! Originally Posted by gnadfly

+1 Exactly!!! And that's per Odumbo's buddy: Dr. Henry Louis "Beer Summit" Gates Jr.!!!!

What the FUCK are you talking about, other than your boilerplate array of vulgar insults?

Of course, I was busy trading in the slave trade in the 16th century...so I may not have noticed.

You haven't answered any of the questions I posed, IBIdiot. NONE. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You substantiated the truth of the statement -- "Historically, almost every people has been at some point either master or slave; often both." -- in the post where you stated, "[Jews] were once slaves", you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. In that matter, nothing else needs to be explained or answered, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

The subsequent post regarding the African - "Nubian" - slave trade on the Nile:

"Professor Robert O Collins, a historian at the University of California, presented a paper describing the transportation of Nubian slaves down the Nile to Egypt as early as 2900 BC. He says that raids on African communities continued for the next five thousand years."

http://www.newstatesman.com/internat...lave-trade-too

was to reiterate how the African slave trade has been going on for some five millennium now; thus, reiterating how the African slave trade predates anything that happened in the early days of the Republic of the United States, or during its colonial period, by thousands of years, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

It sounds "ridiculous" to you because you have spent your whole life immersed in the lib-retarded Kool Aid that passes for modern American education.



+1 Exactly!!! And that per Odumbo's buddy: Dr. Henry Louis "Beer Summit" Gates Jr.!!!!




You substantiated the truth of the statement -- "Historically, almost every people has been at some point either master or slave; often both." -- in the post where you stated, "[Jews] were once slaves", you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. In that matter, nothing else needs to be explained or answered, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

The subsequent post regarding the African - "Nubian" - slave trade on the Nile:



was to reiterate how the African slave trade has been going on for some five millennium now; thus, reiterating how the African slave trade predates anything that happened in the early days of the Republic of the United States, or during its colonial period, by thousands of years, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

A new song comes to mind, "Slave Trade Like an Egyptian"
They seemed to have ruled that market

A new song comes to mind, "Slave Trade Like an Egyptian"
They seemed to have ruled that market Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Slavery is NOT an American value, it is a universal value. It is not confined to one country. In fact, it was given to this country like a case of herpes by the old countries of Europe. We had to pay a steep price for their mistakes.

Don't forget, the so called 1.6 was somebody's PERCENTAGE of slaves to America.

You can bounce around bullshit all you want. It's going to be bullshit.

1.6%? LMAO!!!

Don't forget, the so called 1.6 was somebody's PERCENTAGE of slaves to America.

You can bounce around bullshit all you want. It's going to be bullshit.

1.6%? LMAO!!! Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

It's simple math for those who remove the Kool Aid blinders to see the factual truth, Rambro.

Per Odumbo's buddy, Dr. Henry Louis "Beer Summit" Gates Jr., and the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Data base cited by Gnadfly: out of 12.5 million Africans in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, "only about 388,000 were shipped directly to North America." Per the article cited at #371 quoting the University of California's Dr. Robert O. Collins, another "12,580,000 Africans were enslaved and were exported from Africa across the Sahara, the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean."

Of course, Rambro, no one wants to talk about that second set of numbers, because "whitey" wasn't involved in the East African slave trade across "the Sahara, the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean." That was the provenance of Africans and Arabs -- black and brown skinned peoples -- who did the enslaving, buying, selling and exporting of African slaves, and lib-retards go out of their way to deflect from and ignore facts that gum up their fantasy tales about how only "whitey" is the great exploiter of the colored peoples.

But let's return to the simple math for a moment, Rambro. As cited above, Dr. Gates reports that 388,000 Africans were shipped to North America out of 12,500,000 enslaved. Add that 12.5 million that Dr. Gates reports were shipped out of West Africa to the 12,580,000 that Dr. Collins reports were shipped out of East Africa, and that gives you 25,080,000, Rambro. Divide 388,000 by 25,080,000, and that gives you 1.547% or, when rounded, 1.6%, Rambro.

Hence, only 1.6% of the African slaves taken in Africa ever found themselves in what is today the U.S. The other 98.4% were sent elsewhere.

Oh, and as a reminder, almost every one of those 25 million plus enslaved Africans had a black slave master before he ever saw a "whitey", Rambro.

Any further questions or doubts, Rambro?

I think Creed got off "THE TRACK" when he started out .... "Come on, dude" Originally Posted by LexusLover

"Homey," I like to incorporate "homey" when making jovial statements because it givez it an edge of street cred. I like to end those conversations with "homey" too, "homey."

It sounds "ridiculous" to you because you have spent your whole life immersed in the lib-retarded Kool Aid that passes for modern American education.



+1 Exactly!!! And that's per Odumbo's buddy: Dr. Henry Louis "Beer Summit" Gates Jr.!!!! Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Good catch.

I was prompting Rambrah to counter argue his arguments, which he's been doing all thread.

BTW, has anyone noticed that CNN.com has had a "KKK" article on their home page as an "editor's choice" for the past 2 days and there's really no warrant for it?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Since the riots have waned time to start a new topic. From what I've seen the Jews did not build the pyramids.

Dude, if you kill 2 people, and another idiot kills 4 people, is it OK that you killed people??

Dude, if you kill 2 people, and another idiot kills 4 people, is it OK that you killed people?? Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

By you're way of reckoning, Rambro, which one do you imagine is less guilty than the other?

Dude, if you kill 2 people, and another idiot kills 4 people, is it OK that you killed people?? Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

It would depend entirely on the circumstances of the killings. Which is something you and many other idiots don't seem to comprehend.

Dude, if you kill 2 people, and another idiot kills 4 people, is it OK that you killed people?? Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

It depends on why they killed them... in each case.

Can you think of a better example?

Oh, ok. Sorry I asked.

All I said was that the police force should reflect the community for better policing results. You would not argue that point if say your police force was 97% ISIS. Originally Posted by WTF

It's called unionism

The town was majority white as was the police force

The blacks began moving in, the whites moving further out

The police with ten or 15 years in , or 20, are they wanting to cash it in and quit some union protected government job with great retirement benefits when they can't be fired just because the blacks started coming?

It takes a lot longer for union turnover than for white flight

It's called unionism

The town was majority white as was the police force

The blacks began moving in, the whites moving further out

The police with ten or 15 years in , or 20, are they wanting to cash it in and quit some union protected government job with great retirement benefits when they can't be fired just because the blacks started coming?

It takes a lot longer for union turnover than for white flight Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

I did not ask for the reason why the police force was 97% white. All I have done was point out that it is a big reason for the racial tension.

But thank you for the reason....could you provide a link backing up those findings you posted.