Trump vs Sports

LexusLover's Avatar
They are not all supporters of Trump.

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=50073511&sid=78 Originally Posted by bamscram
"ABC News"? Just quote "Google" why don't you? Here ....



.. share with Speedo and the rest of the Four Amigas.
LexusLover's Avatar
No need for NFL to "God Damn America" ... until now!






... President Obaminable and his FRIENDS DID IT.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
How many circle jerks do we have going on at once LLiarMan?

Try not to LIE about this.

You're a fucking snowflake!

How 'bout them Horns?
  • grean
  • 09-29-2017, 09:01 AM
Equivocating, where? I stated the numbers plainly & accurately. You, on the other hand, said 12 % , which is the entire population of blacks, are committing crime.

That's simply not true and is definitely equivocating.

A far less % of black people committed the crime on that report. So yeah, there a fewer blacks commiting crime. Those who do crime, apparently do a lot of it. I'm all about locking people up who do crime, regardless of race. Why hassle the majority of that minor population because of so few?

The reported numbers of crime by whites complete dwarfs the number committed by blacks.

Here's some equivocating. 77% of the population which is also white is committing 69% of the crime.

Why aren't police hassleing more whites for driving while white or wearing "thuggish " attire? It makes more sense to do so.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Equivocating, where? I stated the numbers plainly & accurately. You, on the other hand, said 12 % , which is the entire population of blacks, are committing crime.

That's simply not true and is definitely equivocating.

A far less % of black people committed the crime on that report. So yeah, there a fewer blacks commiting crime. Those who do crime, apparently do a lot of it. I'm all about locking people up who do crime, regardless of race. Why hassle the majority of that minor population because of so few?

The reported numbers of crime by whites complete dwarfs the number committed by blacks.

Here's some equivocating. 77% of the population which is also white is committing 69% of the crime.

Why aren't police hassleing more whites for driving while white or wearing "thuggish " attire? It makes more sense to do so.
Originally Posted by grean

Since you didn't fractionalize or qualify your previous remarks, green weenie, it would be your equivocating ass that began comparing "100% of blacks versus 100% of whites." And as you noted, whites are under represented in the criminality bracket and that notable short-coming is notably filled with black criminals, green weenie.
bamscram's Avatar
"ABC News"? Just quote "Google" why don't you? Here ....



.. share with Speedo and the rest of the Four Amigas. Originally Posted by LexusLover
You keep showing your medicine, do you need instructions on how to use it.
You old timers are entertaining. Where do you get your info? Email?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Speaking of email...
  • grean
  • 09-29-2017, 09:33 AM

Since you didn't fractionalize or qualify your previous remarks, green weenie, it would be your equivocating ass that began comparing "100% of blacks versus 100% of whites." And as you noted, whites are under represented in the criminality bracket and that notable short-coming is notably filled with black criminals, green weenie.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Did not need to qualify anything. The numbers speak for themselves. I don't believe whites are under represented in those figures. They are grossly underrepresented in prison population though based on the crime numbers.

How would you have fractionalized or qualified that data?
Again, black do not commit more violent crime than whites. See link.

The numbers are slightly higher for murder. Rape, aggravated assault, offenses against family and children, violent crime.....ALL higher in whites than blacks.

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s...decoverviewpdf


How did you come to the conclusion that it was the other way?

In total more than double the amount of crime is committed by whites than blacks. Originally Posted by grean
If Whites on average are committing more crime than Blacks but yet Blacks make up the majority of the prison populations what does that tell you? It tells me either Whites are getting through the Criminal Justice system much quicker than Blacks or the statistics are misleading.

Jim
I B Hankering's Avatar
Did not need to qualify anything. The numbers speak for themselves. I don't believe whites are under represented in those figures. They are grossly underrepresented in prison population though based on the crime numbers.

How would you have fractionalized or qualified that data?
Originally Posted by grean
Whites are seriously underrepresented whereas blacks are seriously over-represented in criminal statistics, green weenie. That fact is quite evident in the FBI statistics you are citing, green weenie. Only a mendacious liar or mathematically challenged imbecile would dare to deny what the numbers show, green weenie.

LexusLover's Avatar
You keep showing your medicine, .... Originally Posted by bamscram
Sorry! You'll have to get a demo from someone else. You get dispensing confused with use ... but its understandable. Juveniles like you really haven't had much "upbringing"!

Back to your disrespect for the United States of America.
  • grean
  • 09-29-2017, 10:02 AM
Whites are seriously underrepresented whereas blacks are seriously over-represented in criminal statistics, green weenie.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I'm not following you. How so?
LexusLover's Avatar
Only a mendacious liar or mathematically challenged imbecile would dare to deny what the numbers show, green weenie.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering
IBH ... you are wasting your time, and it doesn't matter.

As I pointed out ... the current disrespect for the USA is essentially a continuation of the past administration's ridiculing and apologizing for the United States of America.

Have you seen anyone of the "Black Lives Matter" crowd posting on here mention Chicago or Black-on-Black killings ... aka "oppression"?

You won't! They'd rather blame "Whitey"! And Liberal-Nazis-Racists are doing the same. It's easier to blame "Whitey" and pretend they aren't White themselves. So they call everyone else a "White Supremacist" so they can distinguish themselves.

The "White Elitists" vs. the "White Supremacists"!

Elitist | Define Elitist at Dictionary.com
www.dictionary.com/browse/elitist
a person or class of persons considered superior by others or by themselves, as in intellect, talent, power, wealth, or position in society.
supremacy
the state or condition of being superior to all others in authority, power, or status.
supremacist; plural noun: supremacists
1. an advocate of the supremacy of a particular group..
Words Matter!
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Didn't cite any page A62 or A63, speedy. Cited NFL Rule 5, Article 8, on page 23 of the NFL rule book that prohibits political messaging, you stupid jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Seems like everybody disagrees with you. But don't let that stop you from displaying your ignorance. The NFLPA. The NFL commissioner. The NFL owners. The overwhelming majority of the NFL players support the kneelers.

"The last official word on the topic came from NFL Spokesman Brian McCarthy in August 2016, when Colin Kaepernick first “took a knee”. According to NBC Sports, McCarthy wrote in a statement that “Players are encouraged but not required to stand during the playing of the National Anthem.”"

The circulating text regarding an NFL rule specifically addressing the National Anthem is verified to be FALSE information.

Source: http://www.king5.com/sports/nfl/seah...hem_/478360401
I B Hankering's Avatar
Seems like everybody disagrees with you. The NFLPA. The NFL commissioner. The NFL owners. The overwhelming majority of the NFL players who support the kneelers. The protests are obviously NOT being looked at as political messaging.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
You cited shit that doesn't refute anything I posted, speedy.



I'm not following you. How so? Originally Posted by grean
You're being disingenuous, green weenie. Anything less than a one-to-one statistical correspondence indicates under-representation; whereas, anything more than a one-to-one statistical correspondence indicates over-representation, green weenie.