A post for Olivia H and Luxury Daphne, and anyone else who cared to ask

True dat my man-----WTF is the obvious winner--- Ol Ho, the the sad sack, sorry " looser" ------

That spelling -- Our over the hill, mentally challenged , ex-strumpet--- not mine ijs Peace, out

Finally, a winner. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

My Pet lost long ago. He's just been throwing a temper tantrum for the last month or so. It's how we roll. You might not understand.

My Pet lost long ago. He's just been throwing a temper tantrum for the last month or so. It's how we roll. You might not understand. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Have you figured out the proper citation on a hooker board yet OliviaLiar?

[/SIZE]
It is my perception that you were trying to pass it off as your shit because you referenced it in such a weird way. I get it you’re not educated and probably never knew the proper way.

. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Educate us OliviaLiar or leave the thread. I suggest you leave the thread because I am going to break down your lies one at a time if you do not. Not your perception of things but your flat out lies. This was just the first lie I chose to expose. Either show us the proper way or take your lie filled panties and leave. Folks are sick of you lecturing others on the word whore and then turning around and see you using it against others.

... You might not understand ... Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

I fear it is you who does not understand. Claiming victory falls short of earning victory.

Maybe you'll get him next time.

I fear it is you who does not understand. Claiming victory falls short of earning victory.

Maybe you'll get him next time. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

I understand fully. I think it perhaps is you that doesn't understand. We are loosing traction gaining on the petty little goal I set for all of us when my Pet strains against his chains.

I understand fully. I think it perhaps is you that doesn't understand. We are loosing traction gaining on the petty little goal I set for all of us when my Pet strains against his chains.
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

If your goal was liar of the year....you won that hands down several pages ago.

It is my perception that you were trying to pass it off as your shit because you referenced it in such a weird way. I get it you’re not educated and probably never knew the proper way.
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

I am still waiting on you to show the proper way to reference things. Seems rather simple....are you not doing so because you were lying about this?

Oh hello there Pet. Is that you knocking? You know that pleases me; it's why you do it.

Oh hello there Pet. Is that you knocking? You know that pleases me; it's why you do it. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Ok now that we have proven you were lying about proper citation ' s , I will move on to you next lie. Hookers are not commodities but their pussy is a commodity. Good Lord girl you are the liar that just won't quit crapping your panties.

We've been over this Pet, I don't wear panties.

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni (6 March 1475 – 18 February 1564

Are you stuck in the 1500's? Is that why you are having trouble with knowing wtf a commodity is? You want to adhere to the definition of a commodity from 4-500 years ago. I didn't realize you were that old Olivia. Catch up to the rest of the world girl. Quit using definitions of words from 500 years ago.




http://louisproyect.org/2008/02/21/art-as-commodity/

Keep in mind that art only began to become a commodity in the mid-19th century as the artist was freed from feudal ties.


http://artcommodity.com/

Art has become heavily commodified. Like the ubiquitous stock market, it has become something that people can invest in and trade. Originally Posted by WTF

No, according to you Pet, anything that is bought or sold is a commodity.





I went to your link. You are plagiarizing the author. Embarrassing.

The fine art market is not a commodities market. It just isn’t. And feudal lords didn’t bind artist, it was the Church that bound the themes of paintings.
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

The link provided is a proper citation. However, it would have been more obvious to a hurried reader to italicize the words since it is too hard to box quote it online.

Or you could have simply used quotation marks. That said, I could tell it was a quote and do not judge it to be plagiarism.

Case dismissed with prejudice.

{{{bangs her gavel}}}

We've been over this Pet, I don't wear panties. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Yes we have and you know we have decided that your new panties are Depends. Quit crapping this thread up with your lies and you can go cammando again. Are you senile too?

I don't wear panties most days either. And while I have a ton of fancy lingerie, I rarely wear a bra.

The link provided is a proper citation. However, it would have been more obvious to a hurried reader to italicize the words since it is too hard to box quote it online.

Or you could have simply used quotation marks. That said, I could tell it was a quote and do not judge it to be plagiarism.

Case dismissed with prejudice.

{{{bangs her gavel}}} Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Thank you, and I believe that's what I said. That is I said it is my perception that it was his words.

Don't you think it's cute how he gets a hold of a bone though LOL. I especially love it when he posts over and over when I ignore him. It makes me smile.

Thank you, and I believe that's what I said. That is I said it is my perception that it was his words.

. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

So your perception was clearly wrong but then you continue with your pattern of lies when you say this:

. I get it you’re not educated and probably never knew the proper way.
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Normally when your perception is wrong one would apologize for accusing one of plagiarizing the author. Not you , you double down on stupid. I was not the one having trouble with common citations on the internet. You were. You then tried to blame your ignorance on me. Please tell us the proper way? Provide a link showing that I did not properly cite my source? If not we will assume that you were lying again.


Just like you were lying when you said art was not a commodity and I proved that perception a lie.

Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
The Mona Lisa is not a commodity yet it has been sold. Michael Angelo never provided a commodity when he painted. Period.

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni (6 March 1475 – 18 February 1564

Are you stuck in the 1500's? Is that why you are having trouble with knowing wtf a commodity is? You want to adhere to the definition of a commodity from 4-500 years ago. I didn't realize you were that old Olivia. Catch up to the rest of the world girl. Quit using definitions of words from 500 years ago.




http://louisproyect.org/2008/02/21/art-as-commodity/

Keep in mind that art only began to become a commodity in the mid-19th century as the artist was freed from feudal ties.


http://artcommodity.com/

Art has become heavily commodified. Like the ubiquitous stock market, it has become something that people can invest in and trade. Originally Posted by WTF