Why Hillary will obliterate Drumpf.

GRuber goober has goobered his grubered goober.

Thanks Junior. Your Yoda boyfriend is back.

Goober this Gruber.

Still the dupe. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Still the Drunk.

Still the Drunk. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Still the DOTY Emeritus ! And CURRENT DOTY award winner !

Where do you think the information that was on these 104 emails originated from? The information came from the server on the secure network. However, before it was sent to Hillary it was copied to a server on a non-secure network. This information was then sent to Hillary with a classification label of "NONCLASSIFIED". All of the emails from the staffers were sent to Hillary as "NONCLASSIFIED".

You would have something if one of the emails from the staffers came over with a label of CLASSIFIED. This is not the case. Originally Posted by flghtr65

WRONG AGAIN, dipshit! Stop making things up! You keep desperately squirming for a way out of the corner you have painted yourself into! So you lie and make things up – just like the hildebeest!

This is from your OWN favorite source on this scandal - the Washington Post:

"Hillary Clinton wrote 104 emails that she sent using her private server while secretary of state that the government has since said contain classified information... In roughly three-quarters of those cases, officials have determined that material Clinton herself wrote in the body of email messages is classified."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...html?tid=a_inl

As anyone can plainly see, it wasn't information she received from somewhere else, flighty. You made that up – and you have just been directly contradicted by the Washington Post! The classified information ORIGINATED with hildebeest herself! She was both originator and sender! And as you keep telling us, the BURDEN is on the SENDER to classify things properly! So by your OWN standards, as monitored by your OWN favorite news source, hildebeest is GUILTY!

But hey, keep making stuff up, flighty! It's great fun to make a laughingstock out of you and your lame, desperate attempts to minimize, rationalize, obfuscate and excuse all of the hildebeest's crimes!

Oh, and one more thing, flighty...

Did you notice how the WAPO article refers to those 22 SAP emails that you are too chickenshit to talk about? You know, the ones containing intel so sensitive that even the Inspector General investigating the scandal is barred from reading them? What's your excuse for those emails, flighty? Did poor, dumb hildebeest not know how to properly handle satellite images of North Korea's nuclear facilities???

(Ok, I admit I made up that last part, flighty. I don't really know what is in the SAP emails. But maybe you can tell us, since you have such a boundless imagination when it comes to dreaming up alibis for the hildebeest!)

"The analysis did not account for 22 emails that the State Department has withheld entirely from public release because they are “top secret,” the highest level of classification.

The handling of those emails has drawn particular criticism from Republican lawmakers and officials in the intelligence community, who have argued that Clinton’s use of a private server exposed some of the government’s most closely guarded secrets to hacking or other potential breaches."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...html?tid=a_inl

Wake Up frightr65, WTF?

Meet Chelsea's real father!

As we post a "DOS" media mouth piece is trying to engage in damage control to protect Hillarious-No-More from further humiliating embarrassment ... from the DOS "email audit" that was just published. Remarkable ... and equally insulting ... they actually believe the U.S. voting public is buying their bullshit .... page by page .... These jokes make the BP whores, who scam and deceive, look like Mary Poppins and Mother Teresa.

Considering the emails that are being released, I wonder what was in the 30K emails that Hillary decided weren't relevant, and deleted AFTER they were subpoenaed?

Considering the emails that are being released, I wonder what was in the 30K emails that Hillary decided weren't relevant, and deleted AFTER they were subpoenaed? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Move along, folks.... there's nothing to see here.... those 30,000 deleted emails contained nothing but fluff about yoga, who to invite to Chelsea's wedding, what happened in last night's episode of The Good Wife.... you know, that kind of boring stuff....

(....plus details of how much the Clinton Foundation should demand in shake-down money, er, I mean speaking fees and "charitable" contributions, for the US to approve Rosatom's takeover of Uranium One and its US mines, putting much of the world's uranium supply under Putin's control...)

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...m-company.html

WRONG AGAIN, dipshit! Stop making things up! You keep desperately squirming for a way out of the corner you have painted yourself into! So you lie and make things up – just like the hildebeest!

This is from your OWN favorite source on this scandal - the Washington Post:

"Hillary Clinton wrote 104 emails that she sent using her private server while secretary of state that the government has since said contain classified information... In roughly three-quarters of those cases, officials have determined that material Clinton herself wrote in the body of email messages is classified."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...html?tid=a_inl

As anyone can plainly see, it wasn't information she received from somewhere else, flighty. You made that up – and you have just been directly contradicted by the Washington Post! The classified information ORIGINATED with hildebeest herself! She was both originator and sender! And as you keep telling us, the BURDEN is on the SENDER to classify things properly! So by your OWN standards, as monitored by your OWN favorite news source, hildebeest is GUILTY!

But hey, keep making stuff up, flighty! It's great fun to make a laughingstock out of you and your lame, desperate attempts to minimize, rationalize, obfuscate and excuse all of the hildebeest's crimes! Originally Posted by lustylad

LAD, there is no swing and miss. You left out text from your link that backs up what I have said in other posts. Look at the line that said more often than not she was REPLYING to a staffer. Also the practice of sending documents with classified information on a non-secure network was widespread throughout the State Department. From your link:



In roughly three-quarters of those cases, officials have determined that material Clinton herself wrote in the body of email messages is classified. Clinton sometimes initiated the conversations but more often replied to aides or other officials with brief reactions to ongoing discussions.
The analysis also showed that the practice of using non-secure email systems to send sensitive information was widespread at the department and elsewhere in government.
Clinton’s publicly released correspondence also includes classified emails written by about 300 other people inside and outside the government, the analysis by The Post found. The senders ­included ­longtime diplomats, top administration officials and foreigners who held no U.S. security clearance.
View Graphic
Catch up on the controversy and read the emails
In those cases, Clinton was typically not among the initial recipients of the classified emails, which were included in back-and-forth exchanges between lower-level diplomats and other officials and arrived in her inbox only after they were forwarded to her by a close aide.


Lad, this explains why a Grand Jury has not been convened. It was a routine practice in the State Department and throughout government to send emails with sensitive information on a non-secure network. Bottom line, you have nothing that will get Hillary indicted.

It was a routine practice in the State Department and throughout government to send emails with sensitive information on a non-secure network. Originally Posted by flghtr65

That is ridiculous if true.

That is ridiculous if true. Originally Posted by DSK

This was copied from the link that was posted by LAD in Post #395.


The analysis also showed that the practice of using non-secure email systems to send sensitive information was widespread at the department and elsewhere in government.

DSK, based on what has been posted about the emails, you think Hillary will get indicted? I don't.

LAD, there is no swing and miss. You left out text from your link that backs up what I have said in other posts. Look at the line that said more often than not she was REPLYING to a staffer. Also the practice of sending documents with classified information on a non-secure network was widespread throughout the State Department. From your link:



In roughly three-quarters of those cases, officials have determined that material Clinton herself wrote in the body of email messages is classified. Clinton sometimes initiated the conversations but more often replied to aides or other officials with brief reactions to ongoing discussions.
The analysis also showed that the practice of using non-secure email systems to send sensitive information was widespread at the department and elsewhere in government.
Clinton’s publicly released correspondence also includes classified emails written by about 300 other people inside and outside the government, the analysis by The Post found. The senders *included *longtime diplomats, top administration officials and foreigners who held no U.S. security clearance.
View Graphic
Catch up on the controversy and read the emails
In those cases, Clinton was typically not among the initial recipients of the classified emails, which were included in back-and-forth exchanges between lower-level diplomats and other officials and arrived in her inbox only after they were forwarded to her by a close aide.


Lad, this explains why a Grand Jury has not been convened. It was a routine practice in the State Department and throughout government to send emails with sensitive information on a non-secure network. Bottom line, you have nothing that will get Hillary indicted. Originally Posted by flghtr65

you idiot.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...-finds-n580131

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton violated federal records rules through her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, a State Department audit has concluded.

"At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department issues before leaving government service," says an audit by the State Department Inspector General, obtained by NBC News.

"Because she did not do so, she did not comply with the [State] Department's policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."

The audit found that the non-compliance over personal email went beyond Clinton, and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, also failed to preserve government-related emails when he was secretary of state.

The State Department asked Powell to try to receive relevant emails from his internet provider, but "as of May 2016 the Department has not received a response" from Powell, the audit said.

Powell didn't have a private server. idiot.

Indeed, the report's conclusion cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" in electronic record-keeping "that go well beyond the tenure of any one secretary of state."

But the findings on Clinton are sure to reverberate through the 2016 presidential campaign, as her spokesman, Brian Fallon, noted in a statement.

"While political opponents of Hillary Clinton are sure to misrepresent this report for their own partisan purposes, in reality, the Inspector General documents just how consistent her email practices were with those of other Secretaries and senior officials at the State Department who also used personal email," Fallon said.

The State Department's auditors challenge some of the fundamental assertions Clinton has been making about why her use of personal email for government business was not improper.

A federal law requires the preservation of government records, and Clinton has said that since most of her emails were sent to people on the State Department system, she was complying.

But the audit says that "sending emails from a personal account to other employees at their Department accounts is not an appropriate method of preserving any such emails that would constitute a federal record."

Clinton has also said her use of a personal email server did not violate the rules at the time.
READ: FBI Has Interviewed Clinton Aides Over Email Investigation

The audit says that none of the senior State Department officials in charge of information security were asked to approve Clinton's email arrangement. They would not have done so if asked, they said, according to the audit.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton looks on during a campaign event on May 24, 2016 in Commerce, California. Justin Sullivan / Getty Images
The report shows that Clinton was concerned about her personal emails messages becoming part of the public record.

Right! like all those emails from foreign nationals asking how much to give to the Clintard Foundation to get favors!!!

In November 2010, Clinton aide Huma Abedin said they should "talk about putting you on state email," because her private server emails were not always being received.
Clinton replied: "Let's get separate address or device but I don't want any risk of the personal being accessible."

The audit says that some State Department officials tried to offer different solutions to Clinton's email situation but were rebuffed.
At one point, an official suggested Clinton carry two devices, but that suggestion was rejected.

Two information technology officials who support the secretary raised concerns about Clinton's use of personal email in late 2010 and raised the issue with their boss, the audit says.

The director of the unit that supported the secretary's information technology "instructed the staff never to speak of the Secretary's personal email system again."
The Clinton campaign says the report showed that problems with State's electronic record-keeping were longstanding.

"Contrary to the false theories advanced for some time now, the report notes that her use of personal email was known to officials within the Department during her tenure, and that there is no evidence of any successful breach of the Secretary's server," Fallon said.

"We agree that steps ought to be taken to ensure the government can better maintain official records, and if she were still at the State Department, Secretary Clinton would embrace and implement any recommendations, including those in this report, to help do that. But as this report makes clear, Hillary Clinton's use of personal email was not unique, and she took steps that went much further than others to appropriately preserve and release her records."

In a statement, the State Department said the agency "could have done a better job preserving emails and records of Secretaries of State and their senior staff going back several administrations."

"We also acknowledge the report's finding that compliance with email and records management guidance has been inconsistent across several administrations," it said.

face it fucktard liberal clinton asskisser, there is nothing you can cite or claim that vindicates this bitch. NOTHING.

This was copied from the link that was posted by LAD in Post #395.


The analysis also showed that the practice of using non-secure email systems to send sensitive information was widespread at the department and elsewhere in government.

DSK, based on what has been posted about the emails, you think Hillary will get indicted? I don't. Originally Posted by flghtr65

Unfortunately, I don't think she will get indicted. She has too much power.

I only hope she doesn't get elected. I admit that is probably a longshot, too.

If she doesn't get indicted, and then gets elected as President, then I advocate a peaceful Texit (Texas exit) from the United States. The country no longer will have the social cohesion necessary for a functioning democracy.