I edited my previous post. Absolutely no one supports your statement. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXYou are correct in asserting that you are indeed "no one", speedy, but while you stupidly attacked some imaginary argument regarding pages A62 and A63, speedy, you did shit to refute Rule 5, Article 8 in the NFL rule book which prohibits political messaging while on the field, speedy.
I edited my previous post. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXEquivocating!
SpeedoYou should probably just stay on the bench, little boy.
08-14-2016, 01:54 PM Post #103: Trump's ISIS reference to Obama and Hillary very disturbing
:Originally Posted by LexusLover Hopefully Trump will get elected so he can remodel the government from all the alleged misguided events of the Bush-Cheney team, which made fools of all the Liberal Democrats by outsmarting them and deceiving the Liberal Democrats into going along with their "great right-wing conspiracy" ... even HillaryNoMore!! Must really piss-off the Liberals.
Those two guys were geniuses!!!!
Speedo 08-14-2016, 01:54 PM Post #103: Trump has as much chance of being elected POTUS as you have of being a compassionate human being.
You are correct in asserting that you are indeed "no one", speedy, but while you stupidly attacked some imaginary argument regarding pages A62 and A63, speedy, you did shit to refute Rule 5, Article 8 in the NFL rule book which prohibits political messaging while on the field, speedy. Originally Posted by I B HankeringThey're not on the field, dipshit.
You are correct in asserting that you are indeed "no one", speedy, but while you stupidly attacked some imaginary argument regarding pages A62 and A63, speedy, you did shit to refute Rule 5, Article 8 in the NFL rule book which prohibits political messaging while on the field, speedy. Originally Posted by I B HankeringWe have your OPINION as to whether or not Colin Kaepernick violated any NFL rules by taking a knee during the national anthem vs. the statements of the NFL that no such rules were broken. Obviously the NFL, who wrote the rule book, disagrees with your interpretation of Rule 5, Article 8.
They're not on the field, dipshit.
And you're no different than any other white supremacist motherfucker trying to infringe upon the rights of selected groups of Americans guaranteed by the fucking constitution! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
We have your OPINION as to whether or not Colin Kaepernick violated any NFL rules by taking a knee during the national anthem vs. the statements of the NFL that no such rules were broken. Obviously the NFL, who wrote the rule book, disagrees with your interpretation of Rule 5, Article 8.The NFL hasn't been taken to court yet by a patron who is dissatisfied with how the NFL is not enforcing its own rules, speedy.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Equivocating!I was wrong on the first part of my statement. See how easy it is to admit when you are wrong. Many others, Republican and Democrat alike, on this forum doubted Trump's ability to win. You were wrong earlier today when you said that the protesters were not giving time and money to causes. Maybe someday you'll not only learn to be a little more compassionate but also learn how to admit when you're wrong.
As for your "tea leaves" reading ...
..... and having "the pulse" of this country ...
You should probably just stay on the bench, little boy.
Eat it!
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...post1058516047 Originally Posted by LexusLover
The NFL hasn't been taken to court yet by a patron who is dissatisfied with how the NFL is not enforcing its own rules, speedy. Originally Posted by I B HankeringWhen that happens and the court rules that the protesters were violating what you believe are NFL rules, then I will say you are right. Until that time comes, you are wrong.
When that happens and the court rules that the protesters were violating what you believe are NFL rules, then I will say you are right. Until that time comes, you are wrong. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXYou've been stupid since the moment you were dropped on your pointy head in the maternity ward, speedy, and will continue to be so into the foreseeable future. The NFL rule book was cited, speedy. You're just too damn stupid to understand that your BS rebuttals of "pages A62 and A63" haven't a damn thing to do with Rule 5, Article 8 on page 23 of the NFL rule book, speedy.
Sorry! You'll have to get a demo from someone else. You get dispensing confused with use ... but its understandable. Juveniles like you really haven't had much "upbringing"!Deflection is a typical lemming ploy.
Back to your disrespect for the United States of America. Originally Posted by LexusLover
You've been stupid since the moment you were dropped on your pointy head in the maternity ward, speedy, and will continue to be so into the foreseeable future. The NFL rule book was cited, speedy. You're just too damn stupid to understand that your BS rebuttals of "pages A62 and A63" haven't a damn thing to do with Rule 5, Article 8 on page 23 of the NFL rule book, speedy. Originally Posted by I B HankeringThe big difference is the NFL is a private organization. There rules are theirs to follow or not or bend as they please. They can do so at amy time and without notice.
The big difference is the NFL is a private organization. There rules are theirs to follow or not or bend as they please. They can do so at amy time and without notice.The NFL is a business that advertises that it is in the entertainment business; hence, when it sells a ticket to a customer on the premise that that patron will be a spectator at a sports event, that patron has a right to sue when the NFL alters the terms of the contract and subjects him/her to an unwanted political protest.
It was not too long ago that only games in prime time had players on the field. The NFL started getting paid for its show of patriotism so it started having players come out for more games. Originally Posted by grean
The NFL is a business that advertises that it is in the entertainment business; hence, when it sells a ticket to a customer on the premise that that patron will be a spectator at a sports event, that patron has a right to sue when the NFL alters the terms of the contract and subjects him/her to an unwanted political protest.Nope.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering