Slave G proves once again she lacks discretion. She is all about herself.... Don't make the mistake guys!

listen, you stupid fucks who keep challenging slave to prove things….you really think anybody is dumb enough to post the evidence from pm, men's lounge, reviews, etc?

come on. your sauce is weak.

well, ok…dirkdiggler publishes the fact that his father died 20 something years ago because he's too thick to understand that when i referenced his "daddy" i meant whimpers…..then says I'M the one who released rw info.

maybe you are that dumb.

whispers, savak, dicksmuggler…sfk….the longer this goes on, the worse you retards look. EVERYONE knows what this is really about.

While Whimpers counts the views fucktards keep adding to the fodder. This has got to be the most disgusting idiotic series of posts EVER!

Carry on! Keep making fools of yourselves!

so if at the same time she is announcing that this guy was seeking a session with someone and that she herself had seen him and vouched for him......

what if the guy has an ATF that hates Slave and would have nothing to do with this guy if she knew he saw her? What if he was playing games with other ladies that he is broke and can't afford them and now it is out there that he's seen slave as well was trying to see the other lady?...

Those are just 2 real world examples....
Originally Posted by Whispers

QUESTION: Does that mean in reviews the Hobbyist must now do his best to obfuscate the session time?

You are implying so.

Otherwise I don't see the reason you are stating holding water.
Other reasons may be valid. But this one....
You're good about throwing dirt till something sticks.

Asses and elbows, guy. I know you'll luck into something that is valid.

whispers, savak, dicksmuggler…sfk….the longer this goes on, the worse you retards look. EVERYONE knows what this is really about. Originally Posted by john_deere

proving Guinevere fucked up and making her pwn up to it.

Apologize Guinevere. Admit you fucked up.

And kiss Whispers ring and beg to be his sugar baby's maid.

the power of christ compels you!

here's the real question:

whispers, what gives you the right to judge someone over an event that HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU, then fuck with their livelihood...their ability to pay the bills??

answer it. one. simple. question.

or maybe you need one of your little bitches to handle it for you?

proving Guinevere fucked up and making her pwn up to it.

Apologize Guinevere. Admit you fucked up.

And kiss Whispers ring and beg to be his sugar baby's maid.

the power of christ compels you! Originally Posted by savak

dude, you're not funny, interesting, or original.

everything you post screams of trying too hard, and your photoshop skills would make a 5th grader cringe.

srsly. log. out.

dude, you're not funny, interesting, or original.

everything you post screams of trying too hard, and your photoshop skills would make a 5th grader cringe.

srsly. log. out. Originally Posted by john_deere

alright just give me a few hours okay.

ok, well....as much as showing everyone what a clown show this is has amused me for today, i need a bigger challenge....like picking my toneails.

you kids get some rest now, because i'm going to expect lots more stupidity from you tomorrow.

listen, you stupid fucks who keep challenging slave to prove things….

I simply suggested she "own" her actions....

you really think anybody is dumb enough to post the evidence from pm, men's lounge, reviews, etc?

That is an interesting point..... I am considering doing exactly that and weighing the resulting punishment I would receive for the indiscretion in order to make a point.... I just have to figure out a way to get what I would like to reveal maximum exposure and effect before I have to take the slap down that would accompany it....

whispers, savak, dicksmuggler…sfk….the longer this goes on, the worse you retards look. EVERYONE knows what this is really about. Originally Posted by john_deere

This goes on for as long as you guys want to continue it....

Seriously... Can you focus long enough to answer a question? Can you Next9?.... A10?.... Louigi? and any of the cast of supporting players.....

If I were to post the word by word transcripts of an exchange between a provider and someone she THOUGHT was another provider in which she discloses highly personal information about you that was gained only one way.... by her paid interaction with you..... would it bother any of you in any manner? Do any of you feel any need for personal privacy in seeing a lady? Do any of you feel that a lady should keep what she knows in confidentiality rather than simply giving it to anyone that asks?

here's the real question:

whispers, what gives you the right to judge someone over an event that HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU, then fuck with their livelihood...their ability to pay the bills??

Wait a second..... Are you saying that this is actually affecting her in some negative fashion? I thought none of this was having any effect on anything other than my credibility? Isn't that what has been said?

answer it. one. simple. question.

or maybe you need one of your little bitches to handle it for you? Originally Posted by john_deere

Had it not happened here on the board I would have had no right to bring this up. However it happened here on the board in an open forum and the moment someone suggested she was wrong guys like you start to pile on.

I feel a responsibility, not a right but a responsibility to share my opinion on this subject. All of this stemmed from an implosion she had and at the time I was friendly towards her and she sought me out wanting me to not just support her but she wanted me to destroy the San Antonio MODs and swore her support to the cause. As much as I dislike MODs at times... I felt she was simply wrong and when I told her I felt she was making too much of the situation and needed to let it go......well.... she showed how fast she can turn and fabricate lies.....

QUESTION: Does that mean in reviews the Hobbyist must now do his best to obfuscate the session time?

You are implying so.

Otherwise I don't see the reason you are stating holding water.
Other reasons may be valid. But this one....
You're good about throwing dirt till something sticks.

Asses and elbows, guy. I know you'll luck into something that is valid. Originally Posted by Precious_b

As a matter of fact, P-b, a LOT of guys actually DO obfuscate the actual date of the encounter in their review.

The thing is, P_b, he didn't review either one at during the time in-question. Therein lies the rub with your example.

Now, had he reviewed EITHER one during this time, then, you might have a point.


Regardless, this in no way negates the fact that privileged information needs to be kept more closely guarded.


But to take your example one step further, suppose this guy was trying to see some gal behind his ATF's back, and this ATF happens to be, (unbeknownst to him), a vindictive, jealous type....and what if after her learning about his going behind her back, she sets out on a mission to nail his ass....such as get his real life information...lets say she rigs a hidden-camera at the incall...and upon his next visit with her, she obtains his license plates and runs them...and then sets out to inform his SO, ALL because she learned about his going behind her back because some provider let it out that he was requesting a reference...such as Slave Guinevere did...

Don't believe that sort of shit could ever happen?



Seriously?



Would you be surprised to learn that it has, just as I described?



.


.
Think about it...




If, even for A SECOND, you saw how that scenario was/is possible, then you have to realize that tossing out a client's information is WRONG!



.

.

QUESTION: Does that mean in reviews the Hobbyist must now do his best to obfuscate the session time?

You are implying so.

Otherwise I don't see the reason you are stating holding water.
Other reasons may be valid. But this one....
You're good about throwing dirt till something sticks.

Asses and elbows, guy. I know you'll luck into something that is valid. Originally Posted by Precious_b

You are missing the fact that in this case..... The guy never reviewed his session with Slave G.... and never reviewed any session he may or may not have had around that time...

The only one here that announced that he had HAD a session with Slave G to the Board was Slave G.

Come on..... it's considered poor etiquette for someone to mention meeting someone at a luncheon till that person states they were there..... you want us to believe that it's OK for Providers to discuss on the board openly who sees them and when if a guy has stayed quiet on the issue?

So tell me... Are you trying to make these arguments never having bothered to read what it was all about in the first place? Or is it still OK with you?

proving Guinevere fucked up and making her pwn up to it.

Apologize Guinevere. Admit you fucked up.

And kiss Whispers ring and beg to be his sugar baby's maid.

the power of christ compels you!

Originally Posted by savak

TFF!

Come on guys....

We have been using pictures in an attempt to try to help you understand..... We know words probably confuse some of you.....


admit you see it now and tell her it's time to own it and move on...

While Whimpers counts the views fucktards keep adding to the fodder. This has got to be the most disgusting idiotic series of posts EVER!

Carry on! Keep making fools of yourselves! Originally Posted by Louigi

Your setting a fine example for us to follow!