Why Hillary will obliterate Drumpf.

flghtr65's Avatar
Provide the cite of the regulation that states what you just posted.

(And don't spew back some newspaper or blog bullshit. Give the Fed Reg. No.)

That's what you just posted. Now prove it! Originally Posted by LexusLover
The Washington Post is credible. Do you have a problem when LustyLad uses the Washington Post or it's only a problem when I use it?

LL do your own homework. You go prove that the Washington Post is wrong, that the Burden is on the recipient instead of the sender.
LexusLover's Avatar
The Washington Post is credible. Originally Posted by flghtr65
So you are using a newspaper reporter to do your legal research?



Flighty doesn't need a legal education .... he's got a newspaper!!!!!!
I B Hankering's Avatar
The Washington Post is credible. Do you have a problem when LustyLad uses the Washington Post or it's only a problem when I use it?

LL do your own homework. You go prove that the Washington Post is wrong, that the Burden is on the recipient instead of the sender.
Originally Posted by flghtr65
You're still quite wrong, flighty. The burden is on the individual in possession of the classified material -- regardless of how it came to be in his or her possession.
You're still quite wrong, flighty. The burden is on the individual in possession of the classified material -- regardless of how it came to be in his or her possession.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
+ 1 !!!
LexusLover's Avatar
You're still quite wrong, flighty.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Someone as fucking stupid as he is won't understand so you're wasting your time and Eccie bandwidth. Don't forget ... he's defending Hillarious-No-More's criminal conduct.

Not to mention that he thinks Bush and Cheney created the NSA!!!!!

Until he made that pronouncement, I thought he was just ignorant. But he's now proven.....

... he is fucking stupid.
Someone as fucking stupid as he is won't understand so you're wasting your time and Eccie bandwidth. Don't forget ... he's defending Hillarious-No-More's criminal conduct.

Not to mention that he thinks Bush and Cheney created the NSA!!!!!

Until he made that pronouncement, I thought he was just ignorant. But he's now proven.....

... he is fucking stupid. Originally Posted by LexusLover
So he's challenging assup and EKIM for the DOTY 2017 Poll WINNER !!!!! Bet that's not the kind of " three way " either of those 2 like !
So he's challenging assup and EKIM for the DOTY 2017 Poll WINNER !!!!! Bet that's not the kind of " three way " either of those 2 like ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
flghtr65's Avatar
You're still quite wrong, flighty. The burden is on the individual in possession of the classified material -- regardless of how it came to be in his or her possession.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You have a Link IBH?

Not according to the Washington Post. The regulation states the Burden is on the sender to give the correct security classification to an email.

From the link.

Material not allowed on non-approved systems

Federal rules prohibit sharing classified material on non-approved or personal systems. Regulations dictate the burden is on the sender of an e-mail to classify its security clearance level.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...clinton-email/
Hildabeastie Lies... https://theconservativetreehouse.com...sion-she-lied/




CLINTON (Lie #1): “The system we used was set up for President Clinton’s office. And it had numerous safeguards. It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.” — March 2015 press conference.


CLINTON (Lie #2): “What I did was allowed. It was allowed by the State Department. The State Department has confirmed that.” — AP interview, September.


CLINTON (Lie #3): “It was fully above board. Everybody in the government with whom I emailed knew that I was using a personal email.” — AP interview, September.


CLINTON (Lie #4): “The people in the government knew that I was using a personal account . the people I was emailing to on the dot gov system certainly knew and they would respond to me on my personal email.” — NBC News interview, September.


CLINTON (Lie #5) : “In the fall, I think it was October of last year (2014), the State Department sent a letter to previous secretaries of state asking for help with their record-keeping, in part because of the technical problems that they knew they had to deal with. And they asked that we, all of us, go through our e-mails to determine what was work-related and to provide that for them.” — NBC News, September.


CLINTON (Lie #6): “I think last August I made it clear I’m more than ready to talk to anybody anytime. — CBS News interview in May.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
I B Hankering's Avatar
You have a Link IBH?

Not according to the Washington Post. The regulation states the Burden is on the sender to give the correct security classification to an email.

From the link.

Material not allowed on non-approved systems

Federal rules prohibit sharing classified material on non-approved or personal systems. Regulations dictate the burden is on the sender of an e-mail to classify its security clearance level.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...clinton-email/
Originally Posted by flghtr65
Regarding how classified governmet documents are handled, the Code of Federal Regulations trumps WaPo, flighty.


32 CFR Parts 2001 and 2003 Classified National Security Information; Final Rule

Classified National Security Information

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Implementing directive; final rule.

Sec. 2001.41 Responsibilities of holders.

Authorized persons who have access to classified information are
responsible for:
(a) Protecting it from persons without authorized access to that
information, to include securing it in approved equipment or facilities
whenever it is not under the direct control of an authorized person;

(b) Meeting safeguarding requirements prescribed by the agency
head; and

(c) Ensuring that classified information is not communicated over
unsecured voice or data circuits, in public conveyances or places, or
in any other manner that permits interception by unauthorized persons.


The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
shut up chimp. you are an idiot. everyone ignores you

LexusLover's Avatar
Regarding how classified governmet documents are handled, the Code of Federal Regulations trumps WaPo, flighty.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
He's still trying to figure out what the fuck is the CFR!!!

It takes a while to recover from learning about the NAS!