Why do you want to promote the idea of a direct connection between 9/11 and Iraq? There was no direct connection. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornBecause the Bush administration said there was a connection.
9/11 was about the actions of one man (Hussein) and his capability and support of terrorism. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornNo, it was about one idea. And the man that organized it was Bin Laden NOT Saddam!
He was in violation of the treaty he signed following the first Gulf War, he had held an American pilot shot down during the war, he committed mass murder on his own people and it was known that Hussein possessed the precoursers for chemical weapons which he had used on Iran and the Kurds. Afghanistan was about 9/11. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornNot our problem.
As interesting as gay marriage is......................back to gun control. I can't believe I'm saying this, I agree whole-heartedly with WTF's initial post. I have a house in Mexico that I can't go to because it is far to dangerous. My car stolen and me kidnapped or murdered is not my idea of a good time.
The Zeta's kidnapped the police chief and his brother of the town my house is in; beat them to within an inch of their lives; hung them from trees in the main plaza; cut their heads off with chain saws whilst they were still alive; and the WHOLE TOWN SAT IN THEIR HOMES LISTENING ALL NIGHT TO THE TORTURE, BUT COULD DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T ARMED. THAT'S what you get when you outlaw guns.
I personally don't believe big-box magazines should be legal. I also think that all firearms should be required by low to be stowed in a responsible manner with a trigger lock or in a gun safe. Perhaps even limit the number of guns that can be trigger locked and not in a gun safe per household. But knee-jerk gun control isn't the answer.
