Do you percieve this as a threat by Slave Guinevere to out another Provider? Veiled or Direct?

Should anything ever land at my door step my personal retaliation would start with her..... guilty or not... Originally Posted by Whispers

I just read the OP's opening statement in its entirety and realized he's made a direct threat! Hmmmm

You don't read THIS, but you go and count "Slave posts" and calculate 35?

Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

Yeah, it's called a guesstimate. You know what that is or would you like me to post the meaning?

Interesting both ladies have been BANNED. That in itself says something.

It says I have a mouth that I use in addition to my pussy.

But yes she has been her mouthpiece a while now. Those Doubles Partners, err I mean "younger impressionable" females are getting few and far between for our precious slave.

Oh hunty, we don't hang out. I do doubles if asked. None of these girls on here are close to me at all. But I will stand up for someone who is being treated ridiculously. I'm definitely not impressionable, but thanks for the laugh.

She will join the ranks of SCORNED "friends", "doubles partners" "Light Communicators" soon enough.

Mmmmm doubt it

any smart provider would STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THIS!! And the smart ones are proving that.

I just like sitting back and seeing my information become more fruitful by the day. Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

How did I miss this... Oh, yeah, too many threads... This is an easy one... Plain reading of what was posted.

1. Shayla shouldn't have made the HIV comment
2. Slave shouldn't have mentioned "childcare issues", but said explicitly she wouldn't hurt another mommy
3. Whispers shouldn't have described the issue as a Child Custody issue. Childcare may have meant something other than custodial issues and now Whispers has given specificity to it. His mention of it apparently seems to give truth to (2) above, while (1) above is false.
4. The Player claims to have a video of he and a provider who won't see him anymore and mentions it in replies to her posts. That sounds more like blackmail or a threat to release the video than an explicit announcement by SG that she would NOT hurt another mother.

Oh, and #5, all of this bc a provider put the OP name in a signature?? Unsavory. Originally Posted by Netx9

I cosign this message.

How did I miss this... Oh, yeah, too many threads... This is an easy one... Plain reading of what was posted.

1. Shayla shouldn't have made the HIV comment AGREED
2. Slave shouldn't have mentioned "childcare issues", but said explicitly she wouldn't hurt another mommy LMAO...Yeah.... Like saying I may have a knife to your throat but don't worry... I would never cut you"... would have no affect on the person with the knife to her throat..
3. Whispers shouldn't have described the issue as a Child Custody issue. Childcare may have meant something other than custodial issues and now Whispers has given specificity to it. His mention of it apparently seems to give truth to (2) above, while (1) above is false. How do you know 1 is false? Have you been somewhere when she was tested and seen the results? Aren't you simply speculating about her medical condition? In regards to the Child Custody Issue...Shayla put it out to the community on the 28th of February in Austin CoEd....14 years ago Amber was right in her belief that letting the whores post was a bad idea.... They share way too much at times...
4. The Player claims to have a video of he and a provider who won't see him anymore and mentions it in replies to her posts. That sounds more like blackmail or a threat to release the video than an explicit announcement by SG that she would NOT hurt another mother.

Oh, and #5, all of this bc a provider put the OP name in a signature?? Unsavory. Originally Posted by Netx9

No sir... that has nothing to do with this....

I know... I know... It's hard to understand why your beloved should get called out over threatening a provider and her children....

Signature line or not... this is a thread I would have started because of the severity of what she did....

It's unfortunate but she tends to have a lot of people afraid of her and some of you guys are overly intimidating for others to deal with....... You wear them down I guess.....

Can I just get some head?

Is this not a double standard? You can't threaten (and I don't read a threat in provided link) but Whispers can issue a direct threat with open ended consequences! All I gotta say is WOW!

Is this not a double standard? You can't threaten (and I don't read a threat in provided link) but Whispers can issue a direct threat with open ended consequences! All I gotta say is WOW! Originally Posted by Louigi

Hypocrisy drives thread count, which seems to be the driving force in some not-so-local 18 year (mentally) old's feeling of self-importance.

I like choice 3. I don't give a $#!T!!!!!

Okay guys,

Everything is good now. OG has issued a public apology.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1156731

I just read the OP's opening statement in its entirety and realized he's made a direct threat! Hmmmm Originally Posted by Louigi

W has made many enemies so the "guilty or not" is an amazing double standard. Given he has admitted to being outed in the past, long before any affiliation with SG, to promise "retaliation" to her even if she isn't involved is a bold pronouncement. He's put himself in a position to be outed more than once and to tie any future possible outings to her is simply a bridge to far.

No one should be outing anyone... PERIOD. If you're going to retaliate, be damn sure you've got the right target. In a thread who's topic is asking about an outing threat he finds objectionable, to make an actual threat is beyond unbecoming. Add that to the barrage of threads about his intended target, the constant harassing and escalation should be a concern for all. Dial it back, buddy. If you want to inhabit whatever high ground you may have left, dial it back.

As for Shayla already talking about her custody issues long before, I had no knowledge of it as I'm sure many other didn't either. In your reply, you've now brought more attention to her personal life than in your original post... Regardless of whether she posted it first.

How did I miss this... Oh, yeah, too many threads... This is an easy one... Plain reading of what was posted.

1. Shayla shouldn't have made the HIV comment. WHY? It is her decision whether she wants to break rules or run up to the line of breaking a rule. Besides HIV is just another variant of the type of self admitted Health Issues Slave possesses.
2. Slave shouldn't have mentioned "childcare issues", but said explicitly she wouldn't hurt another mommy. Why don't you paste her quote here? Your interpretation is just that YOUR interpretation. Because anybody with a brain could tell that was a THREAT.
3. Whispers shouldn't have described the issue as a Child Custody issue. Childcare may have meant something other than custodial issues and now Whispers has given specificity to it. His mention of it apparently seems to give truth to (2) above, while (1) above is false. Maybe Whispers would have not said ANYTHING if the one you so often defend would not have opened her BIG mouth.
4. The Player claims to have a video of he and a provider who won't see him anymore and mentions it in replies to her posts. That sounds more like blackmail or a threat to release the video than an explicit announcement by SG that she would NOT hurt another mother. WHO GIVES A FUCK? Is this thread about "The Player"? Girls have means of communication in their private areas and am sure they don't need you pointing out the obvious.

Oh, and #5, all of this bc a provider put the OP name in a signature?? Unsavory. Whispers has proven for a VERY long time, that when he is done, he is done. He moved on, WHY PLAY WITH FIRE??? Originally Posted by Netx9

Netx9.. Do yourself a favor. You are going to look VERY foolish (more so than you already do) and RUIN your credibility with the ladies here. Let me clue you in on something, only YOU and a handful of her worshippers are still arguing this. A Plethora of things are going on in the means of private communication, and you and Louigi just look foolish and awe struck by a SLEAZY, DIRTBAG, BOTTOM OF THE BARRELL PUSSY.

Is this not a double standard? You can't threaten (and I don't read a threat in provided link) but Whispers can issue a direct threat with open ended consequences! All I gotta say is WOW! Originally Posted by Louigi

Thanks for the PM Pal. Just had to tell you again.

NeTX9 you really want to ride me or give me a BJ? Ask Ember if you would like it.

Netx9.. Do yourself a favor. You are going to look VERY foolish (more so than you already do) and RUIN your credibility with the ladies here. Let me clue you in on something, only YOU and a handful of her worshippers are still arguing this. A Plethora of things are going on in the means of private communication, and you and Louigi just look foolish and awe struck by a SLEAZY, DIRTBAG, BOTTOM OF THE BARRELL PUSSY.

Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

Thanks for your concern, genuinely. Now put on your objective hat... Because you agree with Whispers in your dislike for SG, does that mean you excuse his open threat?

As for that echo chamber of private communications, I hope you guys don't drop insults and name calling like you do out here. Why is it that none of you can make a point without hurling PROFANITIES?

Btw, good use of "plethora". Might I also suggest:

"Myriad things are going on in the means of private communication..."

You apparently have a vocabulary... So try coming up with some synonyms for sleazy, dirt bag, etc. Your private communication won't impress me... Making a point without insulting someone or name calling... Now that would be impressive!

(your welcome to share your evidence - just be sure to * out the offensive words like C*NT)

NeTX9 you really want to ride me or give me a BJ? Ask Ember if you would like it. Originally Posted by The Player

Anatomy of a player response:

1. Comment about "riding" him
2. BJ retort
3. Toss in a snarky comment about a provider

Check, check, check.

4. Oh, and no answer for any specific questions

If you really want to know, start a poll

I am surprised he didn't say something about "riding him" or something about a BJ, though. Maybe this is the kinder, gentler player? Originally Posted by Netx9

Oh, I get it. I see what you did... Nice!

W has made many enemies so the "guilty or not" is an amazing double standard. Given he has admitted to being outed in the past, long before any affiliation with SG, to promise "retaliation" to her even if she isn't involved is a bold pronouncement. He's put himself in a position to be outed more than once and to tie any future possible outings to her is simply a bridge to far.

No one should be outing anyone... PERIOD. If you're going to retaliate, be damn sure you've got the right target. In a thread who's topic is asking about an outing threat he finds objectionable, to make an actual threat is beyond unbecoming. Add that to the barrage of threads about his intended target, the constant harassing and escalation should be a concern for all. Dial it back, buddy. If you want to inhabit whatever high ground you may have left, dial it back.

As for Shayla already talking about her custody issues long before, I had no knowledge of it as I'm sure many other didn't either. In your reply, you've now brought more attention to her personal life than in your original post... Regardless of whether she posted it first. Originally Posted by Netx9

Think what you want. But her constant references in her signature line to a fundraiser canceled as the result of the threats of the man she lays down with as well as goes hand in hand to socials with still..... the two of them as a couple are at the center of a lot of behind the scenes crap............ well.... call it poetic justice but the devil will get her due.......

she needs to reign in her dogs and move on to other subjects...... Isn't it enough that the took Christmas away from some misfortunate kids?... outed other ladies?.... disrupted lives?.....

She slipped yesterday and showed everyone the truth with her comments to Shayla...... Normally that would have been an anonymous email to Shayla....... But Slave loses it when she gets upset and showed her true self.....


In regards to Shayla.... WOW... Man... you just want everything swept under the rug for SG don't you? You don't care about anything except spinning things.....

go to the root of problem man........ eveything else goes away when she does.....