And also have some type of info sharing. Which is what the site is about.
Originally Posted by B.Wayne
There is info. They're called reviews. But then people get salty because a good review is glowing. But, only for one studio! IMAGINE THAT!
Why does kfest get scrutinized? You got guys that have knowledge and don’t share you got guys that have been around a long time and lie in reviews blatantly.
Lie about what exactly? That they received -x- service? Seriously, what exactly has anyone been lied about? Elaborate.
As in no way it could be a mistake and also there is probably some old beef that I haven’t quite figured out.
There is beef all across E. A bunch of old timers want to pretend they either own the scene or think their seniority grants them special privileges. And if someone dares to experience something different, they pull out the typical promoter accusation. It's a tale as old as time.
Rather than answer questions some people get quiet and clam up.
You're right. Whenever I question posters like Bamboo about their philosophy regarding reviews, he immediately hides behind stupid gifs or images. And we all know why. Because while he feels he can scrutinize and bitch about this and that as much as he wants, the moment someone steps up to him, he immediately folds like a tent. It's hilarious.
I’m not quite sure I buy what your selling.
What am I selling? If you don't like my reviews. Fine. It's no big deal. Seriously, what angle do you think I'm trying to play here? Elaborate dude.
I’ve been screened at other studios and I’ve passed and I have not visited any girls because I don’t think there is accurate info being shared.
What do you consider accurate info? Reviews only from certain people? Seriously, what constitutes accurate reviews to you? If one person said he got this service and he legitimately got said service, why are you saying it's not accurate? What criteria must be met in order for something to be accurate? You're throwing around a bunch of generic terms but you aren't at all explaining it. Do it.
I look at La reviews and I waited. The info turned out reliable.
The same people who review LA are the same people who review the other studios. So, AGAIN, why does one seem to always miss your approval while the others, which follows the exact same pattern, meet it?
Some of the same people that complain about the practices of places like kfest are reliable.
What practices? What people? Are you talking about the troll that has been banned multiple times? Seriously, you're throwing so many generic accusations, but you're not describing anything.
Why would I want to waste my money on a high potentially bad experience?
Because you can't tell the future and no matter how good a review someone writes about anyone at any given studio, your visit might be different. This isn't news. People sometimes get bad experiences. Look at Foxy for example.
Asking questions? That gets you blocked from
Kfest? Is that correct?
If you persist and start to complain about how you're going to complain about that on a review site? Yes. Guess who did that? His screen name begins with a V!
Service related questions like the ones I can ask La that they answer without a problem? That is odd.
It's not the booker's job to give you the menu. What happens BCD is on YOU. If the booker says -x- girl does -y- service but you don't get it in that visit, it makes the booker look bad. That's why the bookers hate answering that shit. So, either you're lying about LA or you're banned from KF for another reason.
You guys screen over there don’t you?
Nope. Why would I want to screen and deal with people?
Forum might be dead but it doesn’t help when someone is willing to spend money on a girl and can’t get any info.
You want info? Read the reviews.
I personally don’t think the girls from Cali should come here because they will automatically want more money and/ or want up charge fees.
Of course they will. Why wouldn't they? They come here for work. The fact that they come here at all is amazing considering Dallas' unbelievably shitty rep.
The push for the cali girls seems agenda based. If nobody believed the reviews of a Cali girl she wouldn’t make any money anyway.
Yes, it is agenda-based. It's commonly referred to as networking. If Cali girl A got a lot of business here, she'll tell Cali girl B, Cali girl C and Cali girl D to come here because she banked.
Who says the reviews of the Cali girls can't be believed? The small contingent of whiners who don't realize how badly Dallas needs more talent? The senior reviewers here who think they matter
Nobody would see her because the hyped reviews. Something legit spreads like wildfire.
Says who? What exactly here has spread like wildfire lately? When Perfect, who was a legend pre-rona, came back here, there was nothing. When greek friendly Seven came back to town, did her return spread like wildfire? When Julie, who is one of the best in the biz was back for a while in the studio scene, where was the fire for her? What about Susan? She was working here and is a known legend. But she ended up spreading all alright. Right the hell out of here.
But yes, let's all blame the reviews that are trying to help the girls. Those are the REAL bad people!