Where is the outrage and fear.

A kid? When I was the age of that kid I was in the military. He was a football play and over six feet tall. Better open your eyes. I am not saying that Zimmerman was right but there is so much out there now and you choose to ignore it. I guess that makes you a racist because you are judging this by race alone.

The "New Black Panthers" are more of a caricature of the originol than anything else. Have they actually ever did anything to warrant their reputation, aside from dressing up in dumb ass outfits and glaring at cameras?

The "New Black Panthers" are more of a caricature of the originol than anything else. Have they actually ever did anything to warrant their reputation, aside from dressing up in dumb ass outfits and glaring at cameras? Originally Posted by Jackie S

they continue to freak out right wing fanatics, does that count?

The "New Black Panthers" are more of a caricature of the originol than anything else. Have they actually ever did anything to warrant their reputation, aside from dressing up in dumb ass outfits and glaring at cameras? Originally Posted by Jackie S

Lol. The 'New' Black Panthers. What a joke. They should team up with the 'New' KKK and produce a gay play. "I shriek louder than You" or "who will piss their pants first. Sign of danger"

The "New Black Panthers" are more of a caricature of the originol than anything else. Have they actually ever did anything to warrant their reputation, aside from dressing up in dumb ass outfits and glaring at cameras? Originally Posted by Jackie S

Intimidate voters? Post illegal bounties? Death Threats?

Yes, they need some tutoring from Bill Ayers like what's his name.

Intimidate voters? Post illegal bounties? Death Threats?

Yes, they need some tutoring from Bill Ayers like what's his name. Originally Posted by gnadfly

I rest my case.

Eric holder is a fucking scumbag. Originally Posted by pantsontheground

Calling Eric Holder a scumbag would be unfair to bags filled with scum.

That's a Dennis Miller joke.

The "New Black Panthers" are more of a caricature of the originol than anything else. Have they actually ever did anything to warrant their reputation, aside from dressing up in dumb ass outfits and glaring at cameras? Originally Posted by Jackie S

The Black Panthers were scum from day one. They were always drug dealers, murderers and rapists from the beginning. Nothing has changed.

Eldridge Cleaver, one of the founders of the Black Panthers back in the 1960's bragged about raping white women in his autobiography "Soul on Ice".

From Wikipedia:

In the most controversial part of the book, Cleaver acknowledges committing acts of rape, stating that he initially raped black women in the ghetto "for practice", and then embarked on the rape of white women. Cleaver refers to the serial rape of white women as "an insurrectionary act."[2]

David Horowitz's turning point away from the left (he had been a communist until the age of forty) was when he found out that the Black Panthers murdered a friend of his. His friend had been a book keeper for the Panthers and had discovered income form drug dealing. The left in California knew about the murder and covered it up. This was the moment in time that Horowitz realized that the left was morally bankrupt.

The Democrats have been in bed with the Black Panthers from the beginning. Hillary Clinton chose to do an internship for a law firm in Oakland in 1971 that provided pro bono defence of Black Panthers. One of the partners in the firm was a self described Marxist/Stalinist.

Tom Wolfe coined the term "radical chic" to describe rich leftists that used to hold coctail party fundraisers for the Panthers. The most famous of the radical chic group was Leonard Bernstein. The left continues this perverse delight in celebrating and supporting evil today by the aiding and abetting of Jihadist activities.

It isn't about who the NBPP is but why Holder protects them at every opportunity.......and Obama tolerates it..

voter intimidation?...fox news has 15 seconds of dubious (at best, or at least worthless as evidence) video they play ad naseum at whatever opportunity they can manufacture.
the BUSH doj investigated the incident and could find no grounds to pursue the case and dropped it. of course with little more than a couple weeks remaining in their tenure, they re-opened it so it would fall squarely into the new (obama) doj's lap.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Bla...Media_coverage

Actually the NBP were convicted under the Bush DOJ and all the Obama DOJ had to do was recommend punishment for the conviction. They dropped the case after the win. You could watch the video with an open mind and you can only come to the conclusion that they were intimidating potential voters.

actually no...
"The Department of Justice became aware of the incident on Election Day and started an inquiry. Under the Bush administration, a criminal investigation into the incident was started, but later dropped.[10] Instead, in January 2009, less than two weeks before the Bush administration left office, the civil rights division of the Department of Justice filed a civil suit under the voting rights act against four defendants, namely, Minister King Samir Shabazz, Jerry Jackson, NBPP chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz, and the NBPP itself. The lawsuit accused them of using uniforms, racial insults and a weapon to intimidate voters and those who were there to assist them.[2] The case remained open when the Obama administration took office a few weeks later.


even if it were true...how many votes were turned away?...not one voter filed a complaint, now lets look at republicans trying to purge whole huge chunks of electorates shall we?

Tom Wolfe coined the term "radical chic" to describe rich leftists that used to hold coctail party fundraisers for the Panthers. The most famous of the radical chic group was Leonard Bernstein. The left continues this perverse delight in celebrating and supporting evil today by the aiding and abetting of Jihadist activities. Originally Posted by joe bloe

really?...have you seen rupert murdochs public financial statements and the ties he has?

What there is no dispute over is that you will never understand that both sides think they are right....and they are according to their on beliefs. The right and the left just have different beliefs. Seems you are having trouble with that simple fact. You seem to want to think your position better when in fact it is not. It is just better for you.
You are just as guilty as the people you accuse. Originally Posted by WTF

i agree and further what most on the far ends of both spectrum's will never understand is that we need both sides to function well...we need the far left saying "take all guns"
and peeps on the far right saying "legalize bazooka's"...so the majority of us {who live near the center of the two extremes) can make rational, non partisan decisions. if we lost one group it would be the end of us. i dont want to live in diane fienstiens world any more than i want to live rush limbaughs world ...wait a minute, who does dope and hookers? wait a minute, he rails against those things?. who is diane fienstien again?

You obviously don't understand the philosophy of the right. FYI, the left end of the spectrum is populated by communists and socialists. The right end of the spectrum is made up of conservatives who don't want to take away your money, your property, or your liberty. Big difference between the radical left and the more moderate right.

Don't be so idiotic with the "legalize bazookas" (since it is in quotes tell me who said it), no one says that but the left has admitted that they would like to take away all guns. You correctly characterize the left but fail to capture the ideas of the right. The real conservatives (not those busy bodies who say that their conservatives) don't care who you have sex with or if you pay for it. It was liberal Harry Reid who said that they should make prostitution illegal in all of Nevada and it is liberal do-gooders starting organizations to "rescue" women.