Wrong in so many ways. I'll point out just one: your assertion that "if you put in one false accusation that costs someone their job you can be sure that a libel suit is coming your way and you are going to get a judgment against you." Good-faith reports regarding illegal conduct (sexual harassment is illegal) are PRIVILEGED, meaning a libel suit won't stick. Also, I should hire you for your fortune-telling abilities. I've been practicing law for 38 years and I can't say for "sure" when a lawsuit will be filed. Let me guess: You're an IT guy, right? Originally Posted by ShysterJonSo, you want to get into the pissing match of good faith v. legitimate, huh? Honesty in fact and reasonable, or according to established rules and principles. . . And do you really want me to start using terms of art on this board? Really? I think most people understand what the meaning of legitimate is, while spelling out a two pronged test on this board seems to be exercising futility.
"I've been practicing law for 38 years and can't say for sure when a lawsuit will be filed"(nice passive voice by the way, seeing as we are nitpicking semantics on a hooker board). I would venture that a reasonable person would find a substantial increase in litigation occurs once a party makes a vengeful letter that contains some inaccurate information, wouldn't you? Especially if said information results in the termination of someone from a position they currently hold. Hell, one might even call that libel unless he was in "good faith" or, as some would say, a legitimate claim. It's difficult to understand the greek tragedy you are describing when we are talking about a legal term of art vs. a colloquial synonym.
Further, I don't think I need 38 years of experience to caution that prudence is a virtue.