Originally Posted by Whispers
He won't share who the provider is or reviewers and reviews so he can't be held accountable for repeating comments made in ROS and private tags. Originally Posted by Netx9That is the MO - rumor and innuendo with no substantiation; all to drive page views.
I'll give W this... Is is smart on here. He won't share who the provider is or reviewers and reviews so he can't be held accountable for repeating comments made in ROS and private tags. The down side of that is that no one reading this can make informed decisions unless they get info from other channels. I suspect it's those back channel discussions he's trying to spur.It was a general question that you are trying to turn into something specific looking for something.. If I had wanted to make it specific I would have.
If in fact they are physically similar and in age and that info is in the public, however, he can draw the comparison even if it's in ROS.
I'd say post the information, provider and reviews and let the community really chime in. Others who have experience with any of the parties involved may be able to contribute thoughts that will help get closer to the truth. Let's get beyond the generalities that providers can be competitive, providers can have bad days, clients can do crazy things, hobbyists get called out for no reviews, even if they're honest.
If not, then this is just innuendo and rumor fodder and that's a shame. Originally Posted by Netx9
It was a general question that you are trying to turn into something specific looking for something.. If I had wanted it to be, specific I would have. Originally Posted by WhispersI'm not "trying to turn it into something specific" - you already did! It may been a "general question" but you admit it was motivated by a specific request, provider, reviews and reviewers to which you reached a conclusion that the reviews were "hatchet jobs" with the purpose of having a "negative effect" after reading them.
My first impression after reading all the Yes reviews and weighing the negative comments included is that they were hatchet job meant to have a negative effect on the competition of another provider.So you an pose a general question, but render a specific judgement. Why not give the community the "facts" to render their own judgements? if you and the ladies who asked believe there are hobbyists engaging in this type of behavior, shedding light on that would be more useful than a "general discussion" with generalizations and speculation as to motive.
I was asked by a couple of other ladies to take a look at this and give my opinion..... Rather than respond in the PMs they sent I post this here for discussion.... Originally Posted by Whispers
The thing is, the nasty review I think we are all writing about was pretty useless in my opinion.What if the lady were simply afraid to post that what happened was completely different than what was reported? That it is all fiction. The current San Antonio environment of threats like has been made publicly in the last few days is having an effect on the ladies.
To act like some hobby crime was committed because a swinging dick didn't do a thorough job of research is childish. It is quite easy to do an analysis of relevant reviews, then of the reviewers themselves to gather a sense of what you should expect. It isn't our fault, or her fault if you missed the clues. If you don't have the scratch to lose, maybe you shouldn't be playing. Originally Posted by Rover14
I have met and talked with both gents in person.
The had bad appointments with provider and wrote honest review.
That's all nothing more.
No hired guns, no way. Originally Posted by bonn11
I do not know anything about that crazy gent though; nothing at all. Originally Posted by bonn11Shut Up Bonn! I've been working hard to keep attention off from you, and here you are... fucking it up.