So what is the excuse for Benghazi?

You're thinking John Kerry. Gore has his mother's money and IB beat me to the house angle but I can point out his propensity for private jets when the world is so close to destruction.

Woops right sorry

With the release of emails, we know that:

The terrorists telegraphed their intentions on Facebook two weeks ahead of time.
The Libyan theater was known by the White House to be very dangerous.
The White House pulled extra security and the bug out plane from Benghazi in order to "normalize" relations.
A hole was blown in a wall weeks before the attack to either test the response (none) or to create an access point. No one noticed a hole being blown in the wall? They couldn't have it repaired by locals?
There was no protest that got out of control.There was in Egypt.
The State Department watched the attack in real time.
The Ambassador asked for extra security the day of the attack.
Security being provided (Libyan nationals) were poorly armed and poorly trained.
The attack lasted seven hours.Didn't the people on site think that a lull in the battle meant that the battle had been concluded? Wasn't it then that the survivors went to the safe house? Is it possible they were allowed to leave so that they would lead the terrorists to the safe house?
The consolate, the ambassador, and a CIA intelligence post were the targets.
Two hours into the attack terrorist claimed responsibility for the attack.
Only someone on site would know and could have taken credit.
Barack Obama was either not informed,refused to be disturbed, or was unable to take action.
Assets were available in the Med. that could have arrived before the end of the attack.
Our ambassador was killed, an intelligent analyst (read CIA), and two former Navy Seals (CIA???) were also killed.
24 hours after the attack the White House and State Department KNEW that it was a planned attack, that there was no protest, and it was pre-announced.
We know what happened next; the Big Lie. It was a video that no one has watched, it was a protest gotten out of control, there was no warning, and nothing could have been done to prevent or stop the attack.

1. Barack Obama was not told; why is no one fired in disgrace for such a failure?

2. Barack Obama didn't want to be disturbed; what was so important and is his command over his people so powerful that they won't take the chance to disturb him. What did he think was so much more important other than flying to Vegas the next day, going on Letterman, or having a party with Beyonce'.This choice is obviously stupid. You put it up there for a joke on us, right? I mean, what total fucking moron would believe something like this?

3. Barack was told but was unable to take action. He was in over his head and allowed people to die for his failure. He was incapacitated (stoned, drunk, psychologically out of touch). He did not want to take action. He put the ambassador there, he pulled the security, and his state department ignored the internet posting. Take your pick. See response to number 2 above. Not even a low life cocksucker could believe this one. We're talking birther on steroids.
The sources this information comes from haven't been revealed yet. So what do you want to accept for an excuse knowing what we know now? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Oh wait! I get it. You want a hanging without the facts before the election. It's easy to do since you already know what happened. Forget the fact that new info has been coming out almost daily. You know enough now.
You're a joke.

So. Since you only put up one choice, that means A: you think they should have the time to do a proper investagation or that B: you can't think of any other possibilities so you put the first moronic answers up there that came to your mind.

Take your pick.


(We know you won't tell the truth and you won't admit you are wrong...........I bet you say something else nearly as stupid as you have been. Something like, I don't know...maybe that Gen. D. Eisenhower was a coward or a follower. At least everybody from Kansas isn't a coward or blowhard....or back then at least.)

No you self righteous, little cock sucking penis worshipper (that was fun!) I want a public trial and I want to hear his explanation but we getting neither. He is avoiding the questions which should be a red flag to just about anyone and investigation will be after the election. Does that sound toooooo radical for you?