1) Does this sound reasonable?
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain
I'm going to assume you used the term reasonable to mean rational. Perhaps another way to ask the same question is: Are my conclusions logical given the facts?
Let's leave aside the motive for any of this happening for the moment. In other words, let's ignore why the Federal govt. (Feds) may have been involved in the events of J6 as an inciting agent. (When I say Feds, I generally mean its' security apparatus, dept. heads etc., the bureaucracy)
I think it is completely reasonable to arrive at the conclusion that the Feds essentially utilized a peaceful protest to create a situation they could call an insurrection for their own purposes. Do I know that for a fact? No. But there are enough open questions to make me believe that something more happened than what the official narrative details.
I guess the first question is WOULD the Feds act as agents provocateur?
The answer to that is unequivocally, yes. In the Whitmer kidnaping plot 36% of the indicted were Federal resources. And if you know your history, the Ruby Ridge Fiasco and Waco massacre was similarly instigated by the ATF/FBI. So is it reasonable to assume that the Feds had some hand in directing or participating in J6? Absolutely.
Why would J6 be any different. BTW, the FBI agent in charge of the Whitmer case, was also head of the DC field office on J6... so he had experience in running those types of operations.
Lets talk about the J6 pipe bombs for a moment. The Feds released video of the person planting the bombs USING THEIR CELL PHONE! Most J6's were out of towners and were traced via cell records... but they can't find this particular person? LOL... I mean
a kitchen timer w/ a one hour duration is going to trigger a pipe bomb 17 hours later? The FBI obviously thinks you are stupid.....
The secret Service even swept the DNC location and didn't find the pipe bomb there...lol.
Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund requested the National Guard be placed on standby to support his forces 6 times prior to and during the day of J6. His direct boss, Nancy Pelosi denied those requests or outright ignored his calls. Do watch the whole interview as it is very enlightening.
Perhaps the best reporting being done on J6 is on revolver.news. Is it logical to assume that the Feds had NO agents on the ground on J6? By their own accounts, they lost track of how many they had... The whole Ray Epps tale is interesting... the Feds are putting people in jail that never even entered the Capitol but Ray Epps... meh after realizing how stupid they look they finally charged him... with disorderly conduct. LOL
Anyway,
there is enough questionable activity from the days events and the follow up to appear to be a cover up that
I could spend days pulling up articles about why it's reasonable to believe that the Feds either provoked, or participated in J6 to focus the publics attention off the election irregularities.
Just because a majority of people believe the official narrative doesn't make it so...
Now there is going to be more footage coming out that Politicians didn't want you to see... why not? You paid for it... what are you going to discover that they didn't want you to know?
Maybe you think none of this sounds reasonable because you still trust your government? You don't think they have the resources to pull it off? Or you think people would keep their mouths shut? heh... Tell it to Seth Rich. Did the DNC ever turn over those servers to the FBI fr analysis?
Seriously why WOULD you believe the governments version of events?