Trump calls for Mar-a-Lago affidavit release

Again - NOT like you said it would be now matter how much you want to try and spin it. Just admit you were wrong, yet again Originally Posted by berryberry

Reading comprehension, chief. Utilize it.

I didn't speak to how it would be. I spoke to how it should be given that there's active investigations to protect. That's my opinion. I get that you have difficulty telling those apart from facts on most days and given your faith in Agent Orange as honest and reputable, but it certainly seems like the balance on this will swing further towards my opinion on where it should go than yours.

If you want to feel like you're right in your own head on this matter, knock yourself out and bask in the fantasy.

I'm happy asf with the outcome of that ruling. I anticipate I'll be pretty happy next week, too.

... Here's yet-another instance where Trump is calling for
TRANSPARENCY and the truth to be shown to the American people.

And yet-another where the FBI is trying to conceal things.

The same FBI that continuously LIES to the courts and
is known for FAKERY - such-as the "Whitmer kidnapping" plot.

So let us see the affidavit - without retractions!

#### Salty

... Here's yet-another instance where Trump is calling for
TRANSPARENCY and the truth to be shown to the American people.

And yet-another where the FBI is trying to conceal things.

The same FBI that continuously LIES to the courts and
is known for FAKERY - such-as the "Whitmer kidnapping" plot.

So let us see the affidavit - without retractions!

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Did the FBI make the details of JFK's assassination public so soon after it happened? No.


If the FBI is going to make details of Trump's Maralogo Search public, it is going to be after everything is done.





Bolding the parts of my post about the subject OP is about to aid in on-topic comprehension BTW

... Here's yet-another instance where Trump is calling for
TRANSPARENCY and the truth to be shown to the American people. Originally Posted by Salty Again

You mean the guy who says in public he wants transparency but won't release his taxes and whose lawyers did pretty much bupkus when it came to the motion to have the affidavit released?

Stop listening to what he's blowing out of his ass and start watching what he's actually doing and where he puts his own time, money and effort.

Or when he pleads the fifth

Reading comprehension, chief. Utilize it.

I didn't speak to how it would be. I spoke to how it should be given that there's active investigations to protect. Originally Posted by HDGristle

That's bullshit and you know it. You were proven wrong, yet again but instead of being a man and admitting it, you say - don't look at exactly what I wrote, I didn't mean it like that



Meanwhile ten years ago, a U.S. District Court judge ruled there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act that would compel the National Archives to seize records from a former president. Better than that. It said POTUS, while in office, has almost unfettered discretion to decide what are Presidential Records and what are personal records, and there is no judicial review of that.

https://amgreatness.com/2022/08/18/r...r-a-lago-raid/

Trump Warrant affidavit - Here is a sneak peek of what to expect from the corrupt DOJ and FBI. Unredacted & redacted versions.

That's bullshit and you know it. You were proven wrong, yet again but instead of being a man and admitting it, you say - don't look at exactly what I wrote, I didn't mean it like that Originally Posted by berryberry

I said what I meant. And I'm winning. You just can't seem to grasp it or accept it. Not surprising, either.

Your sensationalist, all-or-nothing approach to pretty much everything you don't like isn't going to win the day, let alone the battle or the war.

But I have so missed your moxie.

I said what I meant. And I'm winning. You just can't seem to grasp it or accept it. Not surprising, either. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Laughable

[QUOTE=onawbtngr546;1062941389]Did the FBI make the details of JFK's assassination public so soon after it happened? No.


If the FBI is going to make details of Trump's Maralogo Search public, it is going to be after everything is done.




.... WHY WAIT?

#### Salty

[QUOTE=Salty Again;1062941606]

Did the FBI make the details of JFK's assassination public so soon after it happened? No.


If the FBI is going to make details of Trump's Maralogo Search public, it is going to be after everything is done.




.... WHY WAIT?

#### Salty Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

National security concerns? If the primary reason they searched him was because he had classified nuclear documents, that would be a fair reason to keep things under wrap until everything is said and done with

National security concerns? If the primary reason they searched him was because he had classified nuclear documents, that would be a fair reason to keep things under wrap until everything is said and done with Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

Can't believe you are still buying the fake nuclear document line being fed to you by the libtard media.

There are no national security concerns. Otherwise they would not have waited 18 months to go get them. The only concern is the documents could be used to further embarrass and expose the corrupt FBI and Democrat party in the Russia hoax

I'm happy asf with the outcome of that ruling. I anticipate I'll be pretty happy next week, too. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Happy this week too. Sounds like the DOJ got all the redactions it requested and the judge was good with them.

What will tomorrow's conspiracy spin be about the maroon a lagoon affidavit? That Hilary told the DOJ to look in that scary box closet in the basement?

It will show enough damning language about assertions of intentional design to keep documents that are of the highest level security that were never declassified...but what will be the one that fucks Trump in his Ass? The one that shows how he blatantly disregarded Pat Cipilone instructions to return the secret or higher documents? Or something worse?? I bet worse.

If we go by the past with this corrupt DOJ and FBI, the redactions will hide the actual facts and DOJ will continue to leak lies about the facts knowing that the redactions protect their lies.

We’ve all seen this movie before from the corrupt DOJ / FBI

Let's be honest, eye. If we go by the past certain folks will huff and puff and play mad libs with the redactions because they're afraid of the truth.

I mean, who doesn't want transparency?

Donald Trump and his lawyers. Didn't lift a finger on this one except tweets and media statements in contrast with the fact they haven't done anything but obstruct legitimate, legal attempts to have transparency with his taxes. Watch where the effort is put in rather than where the air comes out.

What, I wonder are they so afraid of? What is he hiding?

Why are his followers so terrified of real investigations?