Just a reminder that not every provider wants to be providing

I did read a couple of stories where this guy claimed some escorts basically kicked his ass, roughed him up, and threatened him serious harm if he didn't agree to be their pimp. They chose him because he was smart. I think you can google it; it was pretty funny. I won't post it because I dont think the guy was of age at the time.

...I believe that if a provider does not want reviews her wishes ought to be honored ... whether she "puts out" or not! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Even when she posts ads on the very same hooker review board? Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Nice that LL politely respects personal parameters, but providers who post here should be aware of the following core guideline, as it trumps any no-review desire expressed otherwise as far as ECCIE is concerned:

#29 - Verified Providers who use the Showcase feature or advertise in our forums are not entitled to a no-review policy. Should circumstances arise which require or prompt you to request a no-review policy on ECCIE, please understand that enforcement of this policy also results in revoking of your showcase or ad-posting privileges. Ladies who have chosen a no-review policy on ECCIE may still post and create threads in any of the non-advertising forums on the board and will still have access to the girls-only areas of the board.

[QUOTE=The2Dogs;1059136559]We all know there is plenty of sex trafficking going on in the Houston area.
There are also a lot of "tales" that are fabricated by those that are against all prostitution.


Couldn't agree more. It seems the church groups really sell the sex trafficking story.

Trafficking exists, no doubt about it, but as a consenting adult who does this because she WANTS to, I despise being lumped into the same category with slavers and exploiters of the underage and mentally-handicapped by LE, media, and those who look down their noses at the profession as a whole because they are of "higher morality." I also don't think my patrons should have to face penalties like publication and ostracization as a "sex offender" for getting caught with a willing hooker of legal age, whereas they should toss the key away for the aforementioned rapists.

Sure would like to see some stories on the news FAIRLY reflecting the sex worker industry and clientele, not disparaging us for our free-thinking choices, not focusing on the underbelly of it all.

Nice that LL politely respects personal parameters, but providers who post here should be aware of the following core guideline, as it trumps any no-review desire expressed otherwise as far as ECCIE is concerned:

#29 - Verified Providers who use the Showcase feature or advertise in our forums are not entitled to a no-review policy. Should circumstances arise which require or prompt you to request a no-review policy on ECCIE, please understand that enforcement of this policy also results in revoking of your showcase or ad-posting privileges. Ladies who have chosen a no-review policy on ECCIE may still post and create threads in any of the non-advertising forums on the board and will still have access to the girls-only areas of the board. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

The "war" on "no reviews" occurs in the "spa" section in which there is a prohibition against even discussing LMT's ...

... it's not a matter, Fancy, of being "polite" ... it's a matter of respect for the wishes of anyone who doesn't want their personal "stuff" spread all over the internet for whatever personal reason they may have for it.

I do recognize the "mentality" (as in attitude) of those who have "nothing to lose" by being further dragged through the mud and who try to sooth their own feelings by dragging others into the mud with them..... rather than bringing themselves up ... they bring others down to their level. I'm also aware of the locker room/ beauty shop gossip permeating this "community" and the "struggle" of some to be the matriarch or patriarch of the "community" as the gender may dictate....in order to reach some artificial level of superior achievement ... and the transparent games being played to that end.

Why would I want to post any reviews? Look at them! And then look at the endless bullshit that follows! Then look at the "alerts"! And the following bullshit.

The "war" on "no reviews" occurs in the "spa" section in which there is a prohibition against even discussing LMT's ...

... it's not a matter, Fancy, of being "polite" ... it's a matter of respect for the wishes of anyone who doesn't want their personal "stuff" spread all over the internet for whatever personal reason they may have for it.

I do recognize the "mentality" (as in attitude) of those who have "nothing to lose" by being further dragged through the mud and who try to sooth their own feelings by dragging others into the mud with them..... rather than bringing themselves up ... they bring others down to their level. I'm also aware of the locker room/ beauty shop gossip permeating this "community" and the "struggle" of some to be the matriarch or patriarch of the "community" as the gender may dictate....in order to reach some artificial level of superior achievement ... and the transparent games being played to that end.

Why would I want to post any reviews? Look at them! And then look at the endless bullshit that follows! Then look at the "alerts"! And the following bullshit. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I wasn't impugning your stance in any way, darlin' fellow, and you raise very valid points, indeed. I just wanted new hussies for hire, lusty ladies who may be contemplating membership, and any providers unaware to be well-informed of this lesser-known guideline. ECCIE is certainly not the place for those who wish to remain UTR.

If I had been a female, I would now be a very rich and retired provider to lesbians..

ECCIE is certainly not the place for those who wish to remain UTR. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Really? So your RW name is "Fancy N. Heels"?

Creative parents, I must say!

But you still miss my point, in all seriousness.

I'm not talking about people signing up for Eccie ... I'm talking about those LADIES who are unaware their personal lives are being exposed to the internet even though they have expressed verbally and in writing they wish to remain "UNREVIEWED" AND "UTR" ... by the HOBBYIST (for whatever reason they may have ... like another free month..) doesn't give a shit about her "desires" and obviously doesn't have ANY RESPECT for a LADY who says "NO"!

It's like: What part of "NO" do you not undersand?"

And my point was: Where were all you females, who proclaim to care so much about other females, when they were being run over like road kill in the forums against their wishes?

As an aside, but on point: Does that sound like a guy who doesn't give a shit about females (or males) who are forced into sexual activities against their wishes?

Do not worry about offending LL, he is quite sensitive.

Do not worry about offending LL, he is quite sensitive. Originally Posted by pyramider

What's wrong? Didn't you get to see some taint today?

Really? So your RW name is "Fancy N. Heels"?

Creative parents, I must say!

But you still miss my point, in all seriousness.

I'm not talking about people signing up for Eccie ... I'm talking about those LADIES who are unaware their personal lives are being exposed to the internet even though they have expressed verbally and in writing they wish to remain "UNREVIEWED" AND "UTR" ... by the HOBBYIST (for whatever reason they may have ... like another free month..) doesn't give a shit about her "desires" and obviously doesn't have ANY RESPECT for a LADY who says "NO"!

It's like: What part of "NO" do you not undersand?"

And my point was: Where were all you females, who proclaim to care so much about other females, when they were being run over like road kill in the forums against their wishes?

As an aside, but on point: Does that sound like a guy who doesn't give a shit about females (or males) who are forced into sexual activities against their wishes? Originally Posted by LexusLover

My goodness, you seem to be in a vehement mood for debate today, LL. My only intent was to share info that might not be readily apparent based on a comment I read, nothing more. No need for me to take a side or even understand any particular point.

But as a matter of fact, my Irish grandparents, who raised me, used to hand my long-legged self a pair of flats before I went out, saying, "Why d' ye want t' be all fancy in heels, lassie? No lad wants to date a skyscraper!" Fortunately, they were wrong about that, but yes, they WERE creatively responsible for my moniker!

As to the status of being UTR, I wouldn't be advertising on ANY hooker board where discussion and reviews were allowed if I was trying to stay "under the radar." There are better places for that where all I need do is post an ad with a photo, no forums for communication or exchange of information.

Being on this site is a CHOICE, and by agreeing to be a member, I have to abide by the guidelines. Doesn't mean that I always support the ideology behind them, have had my run-ins, been chastised, learned from the experiences. I have defended both guys and gals when I thought they were being wronged. I do realize that "NO" means no, but every lady who joins ECCIE has to be cognizant of the rules from the get-go, and understand that THEY don't make them. This site is primarily geared toward male clients. Whether that is right or wrong is not within my purview. If a provider doesn't want to be reviewed, stay off ECCIE.

That said, if fellows are reviewing ladies who aren't members and have publicly stated no-review policies, that shouldn't be allowed, period, and mods should remove said reports. However, much time-consuming vigilance would be necessary to monitor. I doubt it's high priority. Perhaps a new rule should be made to protect such ladies, with appropriate penalty for offenders?

As to any other "stuff" being imprudently spread on the Net violating member provider privacy, I can't address that with any precision as I can't read the ROS/BCD of reviews. I, and every other carnal companion, must depend on the fairness and respect of gentlemen like yourself and the mods to see that indiscretions are properly dealt with. Use that RTM button, fellows!

Too serious a discussion for me. I'm going back to slow-roasting ribs on my pit and enjoying this beautiful afternoon with my chihuahuas.

Do not worry about offending LL, he is quite sensitive. Originally Posted by pyramider

That's putting it mildly.

Agree ...

http://www.click2houston.com/news/2-...n-court-monday


Stories like this are real and they are happening all the time (BTW - this post has NOTHING to do with Super Bowl). It's happening everyday, of every season, of every year.

The easiest way to avoid trafficked providers are to stick with providers that have nice upscale incalls ... This statement is true for providers working out of nice hotels or a nice apartments.

Pimps and traffickers always book and keep the cheapest accommodations. All they care about is profit. Whether it be an apartment or a hotel, if it is high-end, you can just about be reassured the provider you are about to encounter, wants to be there.

I can tell you after years and years of being in this industry, as well as working behind the scenes, a providers location can tell you everything you need to know about her before you get to the door. Every provider I have ever encountered that was under duress was always in a room that was under $100 a night or in an apartment that was being rented for under $600 a month and had no furniture except a bed.

Also ... when you arrive if the provider looks as if she has been crying or is "out of it" ... just leave. Upon arrival a provider should greet you with a genuine smile and you should be able to tell she was expecting you. Candles should be lit. The room should be tidy. She should be fresh.

If something seems wrong, it is wrong. Leave and start your search over. It's not the end of the world if you don't get some pussy that day. Originally Posted by Brooke Wilde

Some are much worse than others but there's no such thing as a good pimp. Anytime a provider is giving her money to a pimp she's under duress. Originally Posted by oilfieldscum

+1
Thank you for this post.

[QUOTE=Brooke Wilde;1059135776]http://www.click2houston.com/news/2-...n-court-monday



The easiest way to avoid trafficked providers are to stick with providers that have nice upscale incalls ... This statement is true for providers working out of nice hotels or a nice apartments. [QUOTE]



I feel horrible for the women that this thread is about.
But would like to make a point on the matter of the low cost incalls.....

Some of us that are either new or newly returned to the business do not have the funds for an upscale place.
To pay more for the room would cut so far into the profits that I may as well just be giving it away. And what would that say about my self worth? Lol