or LOL? What if he posted LOL around 700 times?What if someone posted a load of shit 23,000 + times....
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Oh wait, you already have!!!
Fuck you , faggot!
That is the best thing ass wipe, when you get caught with you hand in the cookie jar blame someone else. You have always had a part of my old handle in your signature. Lately you and your butt boy have used it in it's entirety. You have posted many times about my boyfriends, but now that you have made a issue if the term "boy" you want to walk it back. Either put up or shut up dick breath. Originally Posted by i'va biggenYou mean put up your toast to the mention of your boyfriends, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp?
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
They are your boyfriends, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
There is that infraction again stumpy are you ready to take up my offer? Originally Posted by i'va biggenPoor, stupid, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Stumpy the Inbred Chimp, is the jackass who celebrated his boyfriends on a SHMB.
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
They are your boyfriends, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Yeah, because before the holocaust man had never been inhuman to his fellow man. The holocaust wasn't even the first genocide of the 20th century. Do a little research. Hint; look up the Congo and Turkey. Slavery can't be supported by shit. You can use those things to try and support it but that doesn't make it right. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
I don't think America would exist without slavery. The slaves built this country and gave Americans the leg up it now enjoys today.This is a rather stupid post. Imagine, if they couldn't have gotten slaves in North America the colonists would have just given up and went home or they would have stayed within 20 miles of the coast. How do you explain the colonies that were established without the help of slave labor? How about those railroads 200 years later that were built with imported (but not slave labor). Hell, the country would have been better off with no slavery ever. No civil war, no north and south division, no bloody border war out west...yep, it would have been paradise.
Sorry to post this but it's needed. ;-)
Originally Posted by Zanzibar789
Sure my friend because explaining to you is like talking to a 2nd grader. I don't know the percentages and I certainly don't trust a word you say as I honestly consider you to be autistic in all sincerity. In all sincerity. However, perhaps it had everything to do with coming to a basically untapped resource in "America" and creating a society on the backs on slave labor whereas others just needed to work out the nuisances of an existing structure. ;-) Originally Posted by Zanzibar789As you say, you don't know the percentages (at last, some truth). How about the history? When did slavery come to the colonies? By colony, I mean those 13 English colonies and not New Orleans, Florida, Canada, or Mexico (or Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, or Haiti). According to the sales logs the first African slaves came to Virginia in 1637. Now I point out that those were English colonies and not the United States. Spain and France had slavery before this. So the first African slaves were here in 1637 and the United States came into being in 1787. So for all that time England is to blame (just like you blame Bush for everything). Afterwards, the United States can be blamed....until 1861 when the south seceded. Slavery ended in 1866 in the United States. So for less than 100 years (89 if you're counting) the United States had slavery. So England, Spain, and France are more guilty than the United States and we inherited it.
Knowing what we know now, how could anyone with even the slightest degree of common sense (not to mention decency), ask such of a question?I guess you've never heard of the Socratic method? No moral judgements, just the question that is over some people's heads.
Oh that's right, it was JDIdiot who started this thread.
'Nuff said! Originally Posted by bigtex