Thanks again Spice for attempting to apply some semblance to reasoning.Its not a tough question at all it's very simple. Refer to the portions of the guideline I bolded a few posts up. See :"Images".
Take this hypothetical situation as an opposite of what happened.
High society hobbyist takes high end provider out to the Spring Gala, the two wind up on the society page as John X and his mystery date. Fellow hobbyist recognizes the provider and crops out John, posts pics saying "Betty Big Bucks spotted at the Spring Gala." As long as John is left out of the scenario, there's no Real World info out there, except that Betty was at the gala.
Same goes for the opposite, this time Betty was spotted in the back of the police cruiser. Betty still has her identity hidden until the police release it...
Even if the thieving BP whore has a handle/account here, where does she get protection from the guidelines? How is her protection more important that the guys she sees and then robs?
Tough question, but you're a brought young lad, I'm sure you've got a ready made answer all ready for us. Originally Posted by H.Hardhat
Essentially any image of a member not used for advertising purposes or taken in a session and posted with permission is considered protected. If someone posted your example images of Betty it would fall under those protections.