Positively B. If they have a problem with anyone due to any reason, it should be listed on their web page and provided in the screening process. They have every right to not see anyone they please, but once an appointment is set and the person has made the trip, they should proceed with the program. I have been with a few providers that once I met them, I would have preferred not to see them, but continued and just made it a shorter appointment.
Originally Posted by topsgt38801
A is the worst. It is by default a NCNS.
Some guys may not like (choose) women with advertised policies against certain characteristics even if they themselves don't don't fit the excluded class, but that is a lesser sin than NCNS, particularly when reasonable screening took place.
I agree with TS. I've been in the same situation. Unless she has misrepresented herself materially, I feel compelled to keep the appointment even if I'm underwhelmed by my initial reaction to her. I chalk it up to YMMV or TOFTT.
Similarly I would expect the same from her. It is called being a "pro." Not everyday at my job is a walk in the park either....
If I did have a NBA or similar policy & didn't want to acknowledge it in my advertising I'd go with "C" and the B.S. about a personal emergency or not feeling well. But, remember you can only cry wolf so many times/your reputation follows you.
This is a big reason I am wary of providers that change names/personas, etc. They are usually running from something be it personal drama or professional poor behavior...either way I'll pass.