The timing of this great discovery should cause any sane, reasonable person to be skeptical of it.
Originally Posted by Muy Largo
Absolutely, be skeptical and what does a skeptical journalist do?
So your a journalist and you hear this story and you are skeptical. What do you do? Decide to further investigate or analyze how it might hurt the person you want elected and decide to not only not investigate but call it Russian propaganda without knowing whether it is or isn't.
Joe Biden said in the debate. Let me rephrase that. Joe Biden lied in the debate when he said that a bunch of former Intelligence guys, CIA and such, said that this is all Russian propaganda/ disinformation. What they said, all of them because they may all hate Trump but they are not fools, well, I guess that's open for further discussion, but what they actually said was " having been through what we have seen in the last four years, it sounds like it
could be Russian propaganda". And the media jumps on this bandwagon repeating the same thing that they have no proof of and as a matter of fact, have proof, that it isn't and the FBI agrees with the DOJ and DNI.
Sure it sounds fishy especially when you throw Rudy Giuliani into the mix. "Well there you go"! All the proof you need right? Really? So you're going to ignore the fact that the FBI has this laptop and the fact that nobody in the Biden campaign has to this day said the words "those e-mails are not true". "It's garbage Joe says but what he doesn't say is that it is not true"
See, that's what this story is about beyond the possibility of criminal activity. A second story has now emerged and it is "what the fuck has happened to investigative journalist in America where the powerful of any party are held to the same standard"? Ask yourself if this were Donald Trump Jr.'s laptop if CNN and MSNBC would be reporting on it every single night as Fox News is doing contrary to what some on this board would have you believe.
And imagine if a corroborating witness, a former business partner of Hunter Biden's comes forward with documents and phones, can put people together with foreign entities, dates and times and he has a meeting with the FBI and the MSM does not cover that story?
Can you imagine?
Are you now just a little skeptical that you are being feed a line of bullshit to protect the guy they want to win no matter what?
If you were a real journalist, you would be skeptical of that to.
Maybe Joe never took that money that was being held for the big guy. Maybe Joe never took any money made by his brother in Iraq but he didn't know they were making money trading his name for possible favors and he let them continue to do it even when he was told by no less than Obama and dozens of other government people that JOE! there is a big problem of the appearance of impropriety here and Ole Joe said "Come on Man"!
So yeah, be skeptical of the story of the laptop but be skeptical that it could all be true if you just investigate instead of turning a blind eye.