Obama makes public his stance on Amb. Rice

When asked what magazines she reads, she believes she reads ALL of them.

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Originally Posted by markroxcoxinny

You think that was funny?! LOL! You didn't answer the question, because you can't! LOL!

Oh that was an answer numbnuts. She's a certified idiot.

Go ahead, try to defend her.

You're next post in this thread, proves that you are a homophobic racist marshall.

Oh that was an answer numbnuts. She's a certified idiot.

Go ahead, try to defend her.

You're next post in this thread, proves that you are a homophobic racist marshall. Originally Posted by markroxcoxinny

It proves no such thing, but I do get a kick out of the fact you copy my posting techniques....if only you could think up your own shit without copying mine! I take it as a tacit admission that you think me your better! LOL!

Answer the question. What things does Sarah Palin believe that you think are wrong? Do you disagree with her position on Supply Side Economics? National Defense? What?

Mocking you is so much fun.

I disagree with everything she's ever said Marshall, and you too for that matter.

When they banned you from here Marshall, was it an IP ban or just your ID? did you just have to create another handle, or come from another computer?

I didn't watch the lovefeast....how did the WH press corp perform ?

Were they licking Obama's balls or busting them ? Originally Posted by Whirlaway

They were licking his balls like usual. One female reporter congradulated him on his reelection and was in adolation of him stating that she had never seen him lose after Obama noted that she had been there for him in previous elections. Judging from the big smile on her face, you know her panties had to be wet.

Obama also admitted that he sent Susan Rice out on the Sunday talk shows 5 days after the attack. And when she said it was a spontaneous demonstration caused by the video, it was based on their "best intelligence". This was the same lying sack of shit President who tried to tell us at the 2nd debate (helped by the moderator, Candy Crowley) that he called the attack "an act of terror" in the Rose Garden the morning after the attack.

Mocking you is so much fun.
let me know when you start doing it successfully......
I disagree with everything she's ever said Marshall, and you too for that matter.
like what? this just makes me think you hate her because your masters told you to hate her...I don't legitimately believe you know what you're talking about.....
When they banned you from here Marshall, was it an IP ban or just your ID? did you just have to create another handle, or come from another computer? Originally Posted by markroxcoxinny

I am ChoomCar, not Marshall....if you are in danger of being banned and want to cheat, I cannot help you.....

Oh you are Marshall and we all know it, too much of a coward to admit it eh?

SMH

Enjoy a trip down memory lane

http://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=19700228

They were licking his balls like usual. One female reporter congradulated him on his reelection and was in adolation of him stating that she had been there for several of his elections and he had never lost. Judging from the big smile on her face, you know her panties had to be wet.
Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

+1
NiceGuy53

Krauthammer summarizes the Susan Rice lying tour nicely............

http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/14/kr...f-indignation/

Rice knew or should have discovered other information besides the CIA talking points that pointed to a different conclusion about the attack.

The State Department had watched events in Benghazi unfold in real time and thus knew this was no spontaneous demonstration. And President Obama claims he had already characterized the attack as terrorism. Either Obama is lying or Susan Rice ignored the president’s characterization of the Benghazi attack.

Really Whirl?

How did you feel when Colin Powell went to the UN and gave intel about WMD in Iraq that turned out to be wrong? Did you have this same moral indignation?

I doubt it.

Nice deflection, KarlMarxRoxny, but that debate is over. Are you saying that since Bush got away with lying to us, we need to allow Obama to get away with lying to us? Pretty damn weak argument. I thought Obama was supposed to be better than Bush. Isn't that why he was elected?

Nice deflection, KarlMarxRoxny, but that debate is over. Are you saying that since Bush got away with lying to us, we need to allow Obama to get away with lying to us? Pretty damn weak argument. I thought Obama was supposed to be better than Bush. Isn't that why he was elected? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You missed the point as usual.

Let me break it down for you.

I'm saying that you can't call Rice a liar any more than you can call Powell a liar. Powell went out with the intel he was given. So did Rice. Now, she had the SAME intel that McCain and Graham were given from the CIA! But now she and her boss are big liars?

That's bullshit COF and you know it.

The difference being that Powell was passing on information that everyone in government, including Defense, NSC, WH, London, Clinton, Kerry, and many many others believed to be true.

The Rice statements is just the opposite. It is clear the CIA, WH, State, and others knew blaming the incidents on a video was a sham intended to deceive and deflect the American public during the tail-end of the campaign.

It's going to be a fun four years watching KarlMarxRoxny squirm as his Messiah Obama goes down the tubes. It will be the one bright spot in the national disaster that's on the horizon.