Merry X-Mas To All My Former Americans and now Fellow Russians

...when it comes to Russian hacks... Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

... do you like Russian pussy or just Chinese rub girls?

I love how you red leather necks believe in conspiracy theories all your hillbilly lives EXCEPT when it comes to Russian hacks because that's where it's time to put on the brakes. Listen numnuts the anti-intellectual and Resident Idiot who can't articulate a single point won the election fair in square I have no issues with it but I do find it hilarious that you uneducated morons now want to talk about American Ideals and transparency when all we got from the Republican congress for the past 8 yrs was Sedition, Treason, and Obstructionism. Absolutely insane retarded idiots willing to crash the American government, down grade it's AAA credit rating, and sit on their hands all because they were angry and mad an intellectual black man was in office and had the respect of everyone in the world except for idiot angry racist Southerners and country rural folks. A part of me is kinda anxious to see America fail because I don't think that kind of Sedition and out right Treason should be rewarded. All you of you raicst folks were nothing but Anti-American during the Obama years and now....and now all of sudden it's time to be patriotic again? Fuck off dude!!! You people aren't patriots at ALL. You're nothing but white Nationalists and there's a big difference between a Patriot and a Nationalist. You folks are like the citizens of North Korea who mindlessly and blindly pledge allegiance to Kim Jong-un. You folks are basically a carbon copy of the North Korean citizens. Basically Mindless

Carry on Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Your notion that there has been a Republican Congress for the last eight years underscores your stupidity and the illegitimacy of your POV which is based on 'false facts', Sissy Chap.

... do you like Russian pussy or just Chinese rub girls? Originally Posted by LexusLover

She prefers sucker ng cock, especially BBCs.

....a part of me is kinda anxious to see America fail..... Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

And a 100% of me is pretty anxious to see you finally end this nonsense....and just leave. Let's be real, SC: you're not a hobbiest...in fact, I'd wager some coin on that claim right now.

You've been pretty active on this site these past four+ months. But it's been clear since Day One you're here for the wrong reason(s).

Your incendiary rants have become more and more confrontational (especially since the election. Let's face it, you enjoy stoking the "fires"....you like being the antagonist.) It's high time to let it go, SC. Either lighten up or go away altogether. Ya know, go discover the wonders of finger painting or coupon-clipping or somethin'.....

We really don't need you to share (for example) that twit, Nancy Pelosi's quotes, etc with us....or blurbs from an array of other angry, whiney-ass libs who can't get over the fact their party got napalmed last month.
If we wanted to hear any of that, we'd flip on the tube and catch an hour or so of that flap-trap, Wolf Blitzer. Or any of those loons on NPR....

As I've suggested before, you really need to start checking out some of the fine ladies here at Eccie, SC. Many have honed some very specific skills that you may find of interest....no doubt they'll do their very best to soothe your tortured soul. You might even write a review or two and let everyone know what a great time you had. Now that'd be a novel approach as to what this site is about, wouldn't it?

Trash-talking aside, we're not all racists here...nor Southern dummies as you've referenced numerous times. Many of us are cultured, well-rounded and highly educated (we just don't go around telling everyone what an off-the-charts intellectual we are per every other post).

Bottom line....you've brought a majority of the scorn and ridicule you've received of late on yourself...I kinda liken it to Sly Stallone's line (in his first Rambo movie): you drew First Blood, sir...and if you were completely honest with yourself, you'd have to admit you've taken delight in the negative attention. So, in a nutshell, time to give it a break, man...otherwise you're gonna stroke out.

And a 100% of me is pretty anxious to see you finally end this nonsense....and just leave. Let's be real, SC: you're not a hobbiest...in fact, I'd wager some coin on that claim right now.

You've been pretty active on this site these past four+ months. But it's been clear since Day One you're here for the wrong reason(s).

Your incendiary rants have become more and more confrontational (especially since the election. Let's face it, you enjoy stoking the "fires"....you like being the antagonist.) It's high time to let it go, SC. Either lighten up or go away altogether. Ya know, go discover the wonders of finger painting or coupon-clipping or somethin'.....

We really don't need you to share (for example) that twit, Nancy Pelosi's quotes, etc with us....or blurbs from an array of other angry, whiney-ass libs who can't get over the fact their party got napalmed last month.
If we wanted to hear any of that, we'd flip on the tube and catch an hour or so of that flap-trap, Wolf Blitzer. Or any of those loons on NPR....

As I've suggested before, you really need to start checking out some of the fine ladies here at Eccie, SC. Many have honed some very specific skills that you may find of interest....no doubt they'll do their very best to soothe your tortured soul. You might even write a review or two and let everyone know what a great time you had. Now that'd be a novel approach as to what this site is about, wouldn't it?

Trash-talking aside, we're not all racists here...nor Southern dummies as you've referenced numerous times. Many of us are cultured, well-rounded and highly educated (we just don't go around telling everyone what an off-the-charts intellectual we are per every other post).

Bottom line....you've brought a majority of the scorn and ridicule you've received of late on yourself...I kinda liken it to Sly Stallone's line (in his first Rambo movie): you drew First Blood, sir...and if you were completely honest with yourself, you'd have to admit you've taken delight in the negative attention. So, in a nutshell, time to give it a break, man...otherwise you're gonna stroke out. Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

^ what a crock of shit all of it. I never said two words to you people. I post an opinion and you all meltdown as usual and to be honest as expected. It's an opinion forum I will post my opinion and if the shoe fits then wear it...and if you don't like my opinion then put me on ignore; otherwise in the immortal words of Mike Tyson:

Man oh man....you can lead a horse to water, but....

You truly are dense, aren't you? You, a self-proclaimed "successful, educated man" using a broken down, washed up boxer in Mike Tyson to express what you're thinking / feeling...really? The immortal words of a convicted rapist...an idiot who managed to lose most if not all his career earnings ($300 million in purse money), a mush-mouthed moron, who, during that interview, couldn't manage to put two coherent sentences together without employing a string of profanities to make his point? Whatta hero.

You're a fraud, dude. Plain and simple. You can take those immortal words of that imbecile and stick 'em up your tuckus. And oh yeah...Carry On.

[QUOTE=Sistine Chapel;1058954900] since Russia now owns and influenced our election Merry X-mas my fellow Russians we are no longer Republican or Democrats or Americans.

ohhh and one good thing god did for humanity was bring us these beautiful black voices:

Merry X-mas
[/QUOTE

A bit premature (you must hear that a lot) about the Russians. Seems like not everyone agrees and that source...turns out to be a political back. Talk about fake news.

Black voices? Why are you such a racist?

And a 100% of me is pretty anxious to see you finally end this nonsense....and just leave. Let's be real, SC: you're not a hobbiest...in fact, I'd wager some coin on that claim right now.

You've been pretty active on this site these past four+ months. But it's been clear since Day One you're here for the wrong reason(s).

Your incendiary rants have become more and more confrontational (especially since the election. Let's face it, you enjoy stoking the "fires"....you like being the antagonist.) It's high time to let it go, SC. Either lighten up or go away altogether. Ya know, go discover the wonders of finger painting or coupon-clipping or somethin'.....

We really don't need you to share (for example) that twit, Nancy Pelosi's quotes, etc with us....or blurbs from an array of other angry, whiney-ass libs who can't get over the fact their party got napalmed last month.
If we wanted to hear any of that, we'd flip on the tube and catch an hour or so of that flap-trap, Wolf Blitzer. Or any of those loons on NPR....

As I've suggested before, you really need to start checking out some of the fine ladies here at Eccie, SC. Many have honed some very specific skills that you may find of interest....no doubt they'll do their very best to soothe your tortured soul. You might even write a review or two and let everyone know what a great time you had. Now that'd be a novel approach as to what this site is about, wouldn't it?

Trash-talking aside, we're not all racists here...nor Southern dummies as you've referenced numerous times. Many of us are cultured, well-rounded and highly educated (we just don't go around telling everyone what an off-the-charts intellectual we are per every other post).

Bottom line....you've brought a majority of the scorn and ridicule you've received of late on yourself...I kinda liken it to Sly Stallone's line (in his first Rambo movie): you drew First Blood, sir...and if you were completely honest with yourself, you'd have to admit you've taken delight in the negative attention. So, in a nutshell, time to give it a break, man...otherwise you're gonna stroke out. Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

I'm half tempted to take Sissy's racist ass off of ignore to find out how much sand she had in her clit over this post.

I'm half tempted to take Sissy's racist ass off of ignore to find out how much sand she had in her clit over this post. Originally Posted by goodman0422

It went over her head.

Here is Sissy's source: Mike Morrel, douchebag.




http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2...alking-points/

A political hack that was involved in the Benghazi coverup and other fake news items.

Let's be real, SC: you're not a hobbiest...in fact, I'd wager some coin on that claim right now. Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

ohh really a wager? ok $7,000 bet moderated through the site owner and you got a deal...deal?

ohh really a wager? ok $7,000 bet moderated through the site owner and you got a deal...deal? Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

problem is .. you don't know the owners of this site. i do, one of them at least. do you? prove it pissychump


news flash idiot, Russia didn't hack a damn thing. the DNC emails were leaked by an insider loyal to Sanders. Mother Russia didn't have shit to do with it.

your candidate ran an arrogant, aloof and out of touch campaign and lost. get over it fucktard


https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/06d4201...%E2%80%94.html

How Clinton lost Michigan — and blew the election

Across battlegrounds, Democrats blame HQ’s stubborn commitment to a one-size-fits-all strategy.
By Edward-Isaac Dovere
12/14/16 05:08 AM EST

Everybody could see Hillary Clinton was cooked in Iowa. So when, a week-and-a-half out, the Service Employees International Union started hearing anxiety out of Michigan, union officials decided to reroute their volunteers, giving a desperate team on the ground around Detroit some hope.


They started prepping meals and organizing hotel rooms.

SEIU — which had wanted to go to Michigan from the beginning, but been ordered not to — dialed Clinton’s top campaign aides to tell them about the new plan. According to several people familiar with the call, Brooklyn was furious.

Turn that bus around, the Clinton team ordered SEIU. Those volunteers needed to stay in Iowa to fool Donald Trump into competing there, not drive to Michigan, where the Democrat’s models projected a 5-point win through the morning of Election Day.

Michigan organizers were shocked. It was the latest case of Brooklyn ignoring on-the-ground intel and pleas for help in a race that they felt slipping away at the end.

“They believed they were more experienced, which they were. They believed they were smarter, which they weren’t,” said Donnie Fowler, who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee during the final months of the campaign. “They believed they had better information, which they didn’t.”

Flip Michigan and leave the rest of the map, and Trump is still president-elect. But to people who worked in that state and others, how Clinton won the popular vote by 2.8 million votes and lost by 100,000 in states that could have made her president has everything to do with what happened in Michigan. Trump won the state despite getting 30,000 fewer votes than George W. Bush did when he lost it in 2004.

Politico spoke to a dozen officials working on or with Clinton’s Michigan campaign, and more than a dozen scattered among other battleground states, her Brooklyn headquarters and in Washington who describe an ongoing fight about campaign tactics, an inability to get top leadership to change course.

Then again, according to senior people in Brooklyn, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook never heard any of those complaints directly from anyone on his state teams before Election Day.

In results that narrow, Clinton’s loss could be attributed to any number of factors — FBI Director Jim Comey’s letter shifting late deciders, the lack of a compelling economic message, the apparent Russian hacking. But heartbroken and frustrated in-state battleground operatives worry that a lesson being missed is a simple one: Get the basics of campaigning right.

Clinton never even stopped by a United Auto Workers union hall in Michigan, though a person involved with the campaign noted bitterly that the UAW flaked on GOTV commitments in the final days, and that AFSCME never even made any, despite months of appeals.

The anecdotes are different but the narrative is the same across battlegrounds, where Democratic operatives lament a one-size-fits-all approach drawn entirely from pre-selected data — operatives spit out “the model, the model,” as they complain about it — guiding Mook’s decisions on field, television, everything else. That’s the same data operation, of course, that predicted Clinton would win the Iowa caucuses by 6 percentage points (she scraped by with two-tenths of a point), and that predicted she’d beat Bernie Sanders in Michigan (he won by 1.5 points).

“I’ve never seen a campaign like this,” said Virgie Rollins, a Democratic National Committee member and longtime political hand in Michigan who described months of failed attempts to get attention to the collapse she was watching unfold in slow-motion among women and African-American millennials.

Rollins, the chair emeritus of the Michigan Democratic Women’s Caucus, said requests into Brooklyn for surrogates to come talk to her group were never answered. When they held their events anyway, she said, they also got no response to requests for a little money to help cover costs.

Rollins doesn’t need a recount to understand why Clinton lost the state.

“When you don’t reach out to community folk and reach out to precinct campaigns and district organizations that know where the votes are, then you’re going to have problems,” she said.

The enthusiasm gap

From the day Clinton released her launch video, the campaign knew she’d struggle with enthusiasm. Yet they didn’t do many of the things voters are used to seeing to give a sense of momentum, insisting that votes didn’t come from campaign literature, door knocking, commitment to vote cards or the standard program of sending absentee ballot applications to likely voters rather than just appealing to the people once they’d already ordered the ballots.

“It was very surgical and corporate. They had their model, this is how they’re going to do it. Their thing was, ‘We don’t have to leave [literature] at the doors, everyone knows who Hillary Clinton is,’” said one person involved in the Michigan campaign. “But in terms of activists, it seems different, it’s maybe they don’t care about us.”

Michigan operatives relay stories like one about an older woman in Flint who showed up at a Clinton campaign office, asking for a lawn sign and offering to canvass, being told these were not “scientifically” significant ways of increasing the vote, and leaving, never to return. A crew of building trade workers showed up at another office looking to canvass, but, confused after being told there was no literature to hand out like in most campaigns, also left and never looked back.

“There’s this illusion that the Clinton campaign had a ground game. The deal is that the Clinton campaign could have had a ground game,” said a former Obama operative in Michigan. “They had people in the states who were willing to do stuff. But they didn’t provide people anything to do until GOTV.”

The only metric that people involved in the operations say they ever heard headquarters interested in was how many volunteer shifts had been signed up — though the volunteers were never given the now-standard handheld devices to input the responses they got in the field, and Brooklyn mandated that they not worry about data entry. Operatives watched packets of real-time voter information piled up in bins at the coordinated campaign headquarters. The sheets were updated only when they got ripped, or soaked with coffee. Existing packets with notes from the volunteers, including highlighting how much Trump inclination there was among some of the white male union members the Clinton campaign was sure would be with her, were tossed in the garbage.

The Brooklyn command believed that television and limited direct mail and digital efforts were the only way to win over voters, people familiar with the thinking at headquarters said. Guided by polls that showed the Midwestern states safer, the campaign spent, according to one internal estimate, about 3 percent as much in Michigan and Wisconsin as it spent in Florida, Ohio and North Carolina. Most voters in Michigan didn’t see a television ad until the final week.

Most importantly, multiple operatives said, the Clinton campaign dismissed what’s known as in-person “persuasion” — no one was knocking on doors trying to drum up support for the Democratic nominee, which also meant no one was hearing directly from voters aside from voters they’d already assumed were likely Clinton voters, no one tracking how feelings about the race and the candidates were evolving. This left no information to check the polling models against — which might have, for example, showed the campaign that some of the white male union members they had expected to be likely Clinton voters actually veering toward Trump — and no early warning system that the race was turning against them in ways that their daily tracking polls weren’t picking up.


People involved in the Michigan campaign still can’t understand why Brooklyn stayed so sure of the numbers in a state that it also had projected Clinton would win in the primary.

“Especially given what happened in the primary,” said Michigan Democratic Party chairman Brandon Dillon. “We knew that there was going to have to be more attention.”
With Clinton’s team ignoring or rejecting requests, Democratic operatives in Michigan and other battleground states might have turned to the DNC. But they couldn’t; they weren’t allowed to ask for help.

State officials were banned from speaking
directly to anyone at the DNC in Washington. (“Welcome to DNC HQ,” read a blue and white sign behind the reception desk in Brooklyn that appeared after the ouster of Debbie Wasserman Schultz just before the July convention).


A presidential campaign taking over the party committee post-convention is standard, but what happened in 2016 was more intense than veterans remember. People at the DNC and in battleground states speak of angry, bitter calls that came in from Brooklyn whenever they caught wind of contact between them, adamant that only the campaign’s top brass could approve spending or tactical decisions.


“Don’t touch them. Stay away,” one person on the other end of the call remembered Clinton campaign states director Marlon Marshall saying after hearing about a rogue conversation between a battleground operative and an official at the DNC. “You can’t be calling those people and making them think something is coming when nothing is.

Mook himself made a number of those calls.


To Brooklyn, this was the only way to shut down what they perceived early as an effort to undermine the campaign’s planning, DNC officials playing good cop as they made promises they couldn’t keep to friends in the states, took credit for moves Clinton’s staff already were making, or looked to dig up trouble to use against them later

Shunning help from outside

Supporters hold signs at a campaign rally for Hillary Clinton in Detroit, Michigan on Nov. 4. | AP Photo


Brooklyn’s theory from the start was that 2016 was going to be a purely base turnout election. Efforts were focused on voter registration and then, in the final weeks, turning out voters identified as Clinton’s, without confirmation that they were.

Marshall, at Mook’s direction, had designed a plan that until the final weeks was built around holding Pennsylvania and winning just one more state — electoral math that would have denied Trump the presidency on the reasonable assumption Michigan and Wisconsin were Clinton’s.

There was a logic guided by data, they say.

“We have built an operation and we run an operation as if this is going to be a close race,” Marshall said in an interview with Politico in early October. “We have not seen an organization in many states on the Trump side that reflects that.”


In Michigan, Brooklyn tracked 211 staff compared with 58 for Barack Obama in 2012. A source there said the field plan called for an additional 70 staffers, but deferred to the local team instead on using the $1.4 million allotment for a limited paid canvass.


But enough tremors were reaching Brooklyn by late October that veterans of previous campaigns were brought on to help oversee a stabilization — despite tension that dated back to many at the firm never wanting Mook to be campaign manager in the first place.


A battle against Mook’s direction took hold, with multiple people plotting ricochets, complaining to people like Chief Administrative Officer Charlie Baker and longtime Clinton confidante Minyon Moore in the hopes of getting the campaign manager overruled.

Michigan was the only presidential battleground that didn’t have an active Senate race, and that cost the state money from Brooklyn. Waving off complaints during a visit to Michigan a few weeks out, Marshall explained to the room that Clinton was going to clobber Trump in the final debate and they were talking about moving money into Senate seats. And by the time they arrived in Las Vegas for that third debate, Clinton’s top aides were boasting about how they were about to expand the lead and pull marginal Senate candidates over the line to give her a governing majority.


Trump seeks to intervene in Electoral College suit

By Kyle Cheney

In Michigan, they raised more than $700,000 to cover costs, mostly from in-state donors. Though the campaign said every check was signed off on in Brooklyn, Fowler said the DNC approved a $50,000 rogue transfer — let the Clinton campaign complain to him after Election Day, he told them.

“You’re in a state, your job is to win the battleground state, not to have complete fealty to the national campaign headquarters, especially if the national campaign headquarters is not listening,” Fowler explained.


Among the other workarounds claimed was one from interim DNC chair Donna Brazile, who was persuading the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to hold the $5 million transferred to them from the Clinton campaign and to wait to spend it buying airtime for minority voter turnout in the final week they otherwise wouldn’t have been able to fund.

But there also were millions approved for transfer from Clinton’s campaign for use by the DNC — which, under a plan devised by Brazile to drum up urban turnout out of fear that Trump would win the popular vote while losing the electoral vote, got dumped into Chicago and New Orleans, far from anywhere that would have made a difference in the election.


face it pissychimp, your queen bee bitch blew it like a rookie whore .. and Bill told her she was blowing it, and Bill knows about getting blown yeah? bahaa

now get your big boy diapers up so when you read this next part you'll be prepared, ok?? strap 'em up!!!

Bill told her not to ignore the white middle class. She did and she lost for it. you libtards are so lame .. you "always" seem to have this large majority of registered voters but .. you never turn out in mass to vote!! bahaaa then whine when you lose!

didn't this teach you a lesson????





bahahahaaaa


what?!?!? not enough ?? well now you libtards have a NEW meme to live down ... it's all your fault ..

bahahaaa

Sissy Cucker loves for y'all to Bitch Slap her... I think she's a Diabolical Narcissist... Kind of like this reporter who got Bitch Slapped by a SUPERIOR...

Man oh man....you can lead a horse to water, but....

You truly are dense, aren't you? You, a self-proclaimed "successful, educated man" using a broken down, washed up boxer in Mike Tyson to express what you're thinking / feeling...really? The immortal words of a convicted rapist...an idiot who managed to lose most if not all his career earnings ($300 million in purse money), a mush-mouthed moron, who, during that interview, couldn't manage to put two coherent sentences together without employing a string of profanities to make his point? Whatta hero.

You're a fraud, dude. Plain and simple. You can take those immortal words of that imbecile and stick 'em up your tuckus. And oh yeah...Carry On. Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

Chap is not a dude, she's a disgruntled Ho. And not very bright. A complete fraud.

problem is .. you don't know the owners of this site. i do, one of them at least. do you? prove it pissychump
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

you typed a lot of shit to bury my wager. It stands for you or him....$7k put up or shut up...this will be the easiest cash I ever made.