US Airforce Drops "MOAB" in Afghanistan

Something else you learned in the Marines? The 3 weeks you were in? The M.O.A.B. sucks air?
Not as much as your ass.

Fuel-air bombs are thermobaric weapons. They use huge amounts of O2 and have much longer duration blast waves.

But I'm sure that's what you meant, right?

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

No dick head, I was just asking a question, and I'm sure you know a lot about asses that suck don't ya, now go have another drink

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/04/1...mb-afghanistan

You can run, but you can't hide.

This thing is designed to kill living things and leave infrastructure reasonably intact.

It's too early to tell just what the ramifications of this will be. Originally Posted by Jackie S

you're confusing that MOAB with the neutron bomb which does kill living things and leave buildings intact.

I'm not so sure about that lack of property damage. This is a concussive type weapon powered by compressed gas. The pressure will smash buildings and, dare I say it, flatten any witnesses. Wondered why they didn't use this back in the Bush days on Tora Bora. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

they had 'em. dumped them off from a Herc transport.

they, however, did not have the 21000# version at that time. that munition is new.

MOAB... my tax dollars at work!!!

don't worry we can build more.

let's add to this patriotic theme shall we? let's see how many libtards we can piss off!!



Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The only thing a libtard knows how to do with a bayonet is sit on it!

MOAB... my tax dollars at work!!! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

"Rumor has it" that there will be a "line item" on the 2017 returns for "Special Contributions" for "Special Materiel"!

It will be considered a "Tax Credit"!

you're confusing that MOAB with the neutron bomb which does kill living things and leave buildings intact. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Not nessessarilly with the Neutron Bomb, but I think I was wrong in my description. The MOAB does do considerable damage to everything, living and structural. Huge blast tend to do that.

I'm not sure how old you are, but can out remember years ago when there was first talk of the Neutron Bomb as a low yield nuclear device that emitted an an exorbanant amount of Neutrons that passed right through infrastructure but killed living cells instantly. The ultimate anti personal weapon.

Of course, all nuclear weapons emit huge amounts of Neutrons, just the idea of saving buildings while killing people just seemed aborhant.

People were appalled. As I remember, there was talk of placing these types of weapons in the same category as chemical weapons and hollow point bullets on the Battle field.

I wonder if we, or any of the other Nuclear Powers, have Neutron Bombs?

The difference is, the Military would have never taken this action under President Obama, because the answer would have been no.

President Trump has made it plain that he gives his Generals discretion in these matters. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Not correct, Obama gave permission in January 2016 and left it up to the local military commanders when and where to use it. Detailed in plenty of articles

Something else you learned in the Marines? The 3 weeks you were in? The M.O.A.B. sucks air?
Not as much as your ass.

Fuel-air bombs are thermobaric weapons. They use huge amounts of O2 and have much longer duration blast waves.

But I'm sure that's what you meant, right?

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You learned about this while peeling potatoes or sucking brass cock?

The only thing a libtard knows how to do with a bayonet is sit on it!

[] Originally Posted by lustylad

Or slit your throat...



.

The question no one has asked- was if this bomb was needed? How many ISIS fighters do you really think are in Afghanistan? Surely, not the same number as in Iraq or Syria. I wouldn't be surprised if no more than 100 ISIS fighters were killed-if that- simply overkill just like the 59 Tomahawk missiles that were launched and the Syrian Airbase was operational in 48 hours. Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

Killing fighters was not the point...deny operational utility AND









wait for it















































MESSAGING...

Or slit your throat...



. Originally Posted by WDF

or to threaten an 18 year old hairless Filipino pool boy to engage in sodomy...gay sex is a liberal sacrament you know

FUCK YOU MASTERDICKMUNCHER

Something else you learned in the Marines? The 3 weeks you were in? The M.O.A.B. sucks air?
Not as much as your ass.

Fuel-air bombs are thermobaric weapons. They use huge amounts of O2 and have much longer duration blast waves.

But I'm sure that's what you meant, right?

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

or to threaten an 18 year old hairless Filipino pool boy to engage in sodomy...gay sex is a liberal sacrament you know Originally Posted by Marshall2.0

You have to threaten you pool boy for sex?


.

You learned about this while peeling potatoes or sucking brass cock? Originally Posted by Marshall2.0

He was on the same " field latrine " detail as lubedwideass burning honey buckets. All of his "military " experience and knowledge comes from the " seArgent ", " seArgent shtiburner, that is !