IMPEACH CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS!

CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 07-02-2012, 12:44 PM
Of course I have to point out to WTF, Big Tits, and others that you can no longer complain about the Supreme Court decision of 2000. You have all been whining about that for years erroneously. They did not decided the election but they did decided whether Florida could legally change the rules after the fact. You have all been complaining about what the Supreme court did but now you laugh because the SCOTUS decided your way even though there have been allegations by CBS (not FOX news) that some corruption was involved. So you should all publicly admit AND NEVER SAY IT AGAIN that the SCOTUS was right in 2000. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

you wrote that all by yourself didnt you?

Maxx's Avatar
  • Maxx
  • 07-02-2012, 12:59 PM
I agree, he should resign his position, but unfortunately, he can't be impeached for for making a ruling. He has to break the law someway or another and be brought up on charges.



Under normal circumstances, a Supreme Court justice is awarded a lifetime commission.

A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government official under Articles I and II of the Constitution.

Article III, Section 1 states that judges of Article III courts shall hold their offices "during good behavior." "The phrase "good behavior" has been interpreted by the courts to equate to the same level of seriousness 'high crimes and misdemeanors" encompasses.

In addition, any federal judge may prosecuted in the criminal courts for criminal activity. If found guilty of a crime in a federal district court, the justice would face the same type of sentencing any other criminal defendant would. The district court could not remove him/her from the Bench. However, any justice found guilty in the criminal courts of any felony would certainly be impeached and, if found guilty, removed from office.

In the United States, impeachment is most often used to remove corrupt lower-court federal judges from office, but it's not unusual to find disgruntled special interest groups circulating petitions on the internet calling for the impeachment of one or all members of the High Court.

The Impeachment Process

Impeachment is a two-step process; the impeachment phase is similar to a Grand Jury hearing, where charges (called "articles of impeachment") are presented and the House of Representatives determines whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant a trial. If the House vote passes by a simple majority, the defendant is "impeached," and proceeds to trial in the Senate.

The House of Representatives indicts the accused on articles of impeachment, and, if impeached, the Senate conducts a trial to determine the party's guilt or innocence.

The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.

At the trial a committee from the House of Representatives, called "Managers," act as the prosecutors. Per constitutional mandate (Article I, Section 3), the Chief Justice of the United States (Supreme Court) must preside over the Senate trial of the President. If any other official is on trial, an "Impeachment Trial Committee" of Senators act as the presiding judges to hear testimony and evidence against the accused, which is then presented as a report to the remained of the Senate. The full Senate no longer participates in the hearing phase of the removal trial. This procedure came into practice in 1986 when the Senate amended its rules and procedures for impeachment and has been contested by several federal court judges, but the Supreme Court has declined to interfere in the process, calling the issue a political, not legal, matter.

At the conclusion of the trial, the full Senate votes and must return a two-thirds Super Majority for conviction. Convicted officials are removed from office immediately and barred from holding future office. The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.

Impeachment and Near Impeachment


Only one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase (one of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence), has ever been impeached. The House of Representatives accused Chase of letting his Federalist political leanings affect his rulings, and served him with eight articles of impeachment in late 1804. The Senate acquitted him of all charges in 1805, establishing the right of the judiciary to independent opinion. Chase continued on the Court until his death in June 1811.

In 1957, at the height of McCarthyism, the Georgia General Assembly passed a joint resolution calling for "The Impeachment of Certain U.S. Supreme Court Justices" believed to be enabling Communism with their decisions. The resolution targeted Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, Tom Campbell Clark, Felix Frankfurter, and Stanley Forman Reed (as well as several unnamed deceased Justices) for "...[usurping] the congressional power to make law in violation of Article I, Sections I and 8, and violated Sections 3 and 5 of the 14th Amendment and nullified the 10th Amendment of the Constitution."

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_S...#ixzz1zUO2O0vY
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 07-02-2012, 01:05 PM
fuck that


the law raises taxes, Period.

all revenue and tax bills originate in the House, ergo congress can raise or lower taxes, in this case raise.

NOT ONE THING IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL about Rboerts decision ... unless someone can prove the healthcare law doesnt raise taxes ?

ANYONE?
I was wondering how long my righty friends would cry about this!

My guess was until November .... and then beyond after the Mitt has lost and they lament that they should have run Santorum.

Could you crybabies impeach him sometime in the next four years so Obama can appoint another Justice?

If you crybabies understood just what happened , you would realize that Roberts handed you many victories in the future with this ruling. Originally Posted by WTF
Watching them cry foul and carry on when Obama gets re-elected for another term. Man can't wait for the repubs to start even more crap and whining when that day comes.
budman33's Avatar
All those lobbyists and they didn't get what they wanted. Shameful.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 07-02-2012, 02:10 PM
All those lobbyists and they didn't get what they wanted. Shameful. Originally Posted by budman33
they got exactly what theyve been saying all along ... Obamacare raises taxes

Impeachment won't happen; but he should be suspcious of every waiter/waitress that serves him his food when he goes out...........every banquet meal, every breakfast, every luncheon.......food handlers have strange ways of treating those they dislike.

He is a pariah; make Robert's life miserable for the next 30 years he is on the court...mock him, taunt him, etc.

He isn't welcome in public. Stay home Robert's.

Harriett Meirs is looking like a good nomination to me.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 07-02-2012, 05:31 PM
pretty unrealistically funny whirlie
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Are you kidding? He's the toast of Washington. He'll be at every high society party. Washington is his town, now. He has no worries. Washington loves him.
Yeah; but in the back of his liberal mind will be the nagging thought ..."could this waiter be a closet Libertarian ? "

Afterall, they are everywhere.



Are you kidding? He's the toast of Washington. He'll be at every high society party. Washington is his town, now. He has no worries. Washington loves him. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Come on, Guys, a Supreme Court Justice can rule any way they want, and does not have to answer to anybody but Congress, who does have the power of impeachment.

But get real. Just who, (or what), would President Obama replace him with? Good Lord.
Teagulls! Originally Posted by WTF
Good catch, I stand corrected!!!!!

But get real. Just who, (or what), would President Obama replace him with? Good Lord. Originally Posted by Jackie S
Oh come now, you're asking for analytical reasoning from these guys? Ain't gonna happen in this lifetime!