AND YOU THINK PEOPLE ARE PISSED NOW...WAIT TILL THE "CADILLAC TAX" KICKS IN !

Yssup Rider's Avatar
Now that's not what you said. You are doing what liberals do.

Back pedal (aka "peddle"). Obaminable is the master at it.

A majority of the U.S. citizens don't buy it anymore. Most of the world doesn't either. Originally Posted by LexusLover
another cunt-tree heard from
flghtr65's Avatar
That is an untrue statement. Originally Posted by LexusLover
LL, here are two examples of people with pre-existing conditions that could not get health insurance in the individual market old system. These people were repeatedly denied coverage in the individual market. In the second link the person lived in a state that had a high risk pool but you had to be uninsured for 6 months before you could apply to get in the high risk pool. Even the high risk pools don't want to insure people with pre-existing conditions.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/21/opinio...iref=allsearch

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-m-republican-love-obamacare-153017542.html
Doove's Avatar
  • Doove
  • 04-07-2014, 05:09 AM
Nice! That is a great job of making shit up about someone else to make yourself feel superior! Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Says the guy who can't stop calling me Doofe.

Seriously, Doofe, give it up. You are perennially inferior. Nice try, though!

Read your post a couple three times. Didn't see a rebuttal to my point.

Nice try, though!
LexusLover's Avatar
LL, here are two examples of people with pre-existing conditions that could not get health insurance in the individual market old system. Originally Posted by flghtr65
So?

BTW .. is the "individual market old system" a new term in the industry ..

or is that part of the new talking-points mantra of the Believers?

I personally know of an "example" of someone (very close) who claimed to be unable to obtain coverage with a "pre-existing condition" .....and another who did get coverage with "pre-existing CONDITIONS" ....

....BEFORE the "individual market old system" was thwarted with Executive Orders and assaulted by this horrendously unnecessary law.

The latter gave the former a list of carriers to contact OFF A WEBSITE THAT WORKED .... ....BEFORE the "individual market old system" was thwarted with Executive Orders and assaulted by this horrendously unnecessary law with an UNWORKABLE WEBSITE.

FYI: Group policies acquired through employment (or elsewhere) accepted "pre-existing conditions"!

May be if the same effort were expended on creating REAL JOBS instead of moving one step closer to "nationalized" medicine, then those who finally got a REAL JOB would be able to support themselves and get off the government tit, AND GET HEALTH INSURANCE COVERING A "PRE-EXISTING CONDITION"!

What a novel idea. Huh? People having jobs. People getting jobs. And wanting jobs!

Trying to justify this debacle AFTER IT IS PASSED is "Nancy's Plan" ... because she didn't know what it said when she rammed it down everyone's throat .. for two reasons ... one .. it didn't make a shit to her as long as California got bailed out of its "over-generous" retirement plan fundings .. two .. the Executive Orders and Agency Exemptions had not all been written and executed.

That's like the bullshit about it costing jobs and people actually claiming that is a good thing because people in this country work too much anyway and they need the rest!

Do you remember Obaminable proclaiming it would "create" jobs? Really?

2. you can keep your insurance if you like it.
3. you can keep your physicians if you like them!

Psst .. if a government "program" causes carriers to cancel policies and thereby leaving a citizen with "PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS" with no coverage, then don't you think the government "program" ought to provide that the citizen would be able to acquire replacement coverage for the "PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS" that were covered in the first place? (Check the Constitution of the United States and its amendments)

"Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
In the individual market old system, if you had a pre-existing condition (high blood sugar, high cholesterol, or an autistic child) no health company would sell you a policy."

LL's response:
"That is an untrue statement."

It still is!

Roughly a third (actually slightly more) of the U.S. population have "high blood sugar" .. which means about 100 million people. "High cholesterol" goes hand-in-hand with "high blood sugar"~! As for autistic children roughly 1 out of 70 children are diagnosed as "autistic" .. and of those a substantial number have "normal" ranges of functional intelligence and activities or better. Check the CDC.

I mean if you want to know how well they function .. just look at YR! Other than believing the ENFIELD DRUG is in Clarksville, and having spurts of vulgarity ... he at least knows how to log on.