What was the point in using a 5-year old article to start a thread about current events? Was it that we need to use two sets of kids gloves in figuring out how to handle the unrest in Syria because THAT's where Iraq's WMD went?
Originally Posted by Sisyphus
The point is that Syrian unrust may result in a change in Syrian government. The unrest may bring to light that Iraqi WMD were sent to Syria. People said Bush lied about Iraqi WMD. If it becomes known that Bush did not lie, people may look at Bush's actions differently. Obama was the only 2008 dum presidential hopeful to oppose Iraq II. He was elected because he was not Bush. It contributes to the perception that he is clueless about foreign policy.
It's the CURRENT events in Syria which may have an impact on our 2012 election. Happy to connect the dots for you.
BTW: It seems my cyber-stalker has an advanced case of Marshall Derangement Syndrome. ALL of the symptoms are evident.......HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!