The latest instance of "proof" of global warming.

I dont see how pumping megatons of smoke into our atmosphere helps matters.

Note on climate change , Fall of the Mayan civilizational caused by 100 year drought in 900AD , so clearly it was caused be SUVs and truck they were driving and the coal plants ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,gore said so ( idiots)

fucking ridiculous argument heavily promoted by the fossil fuel industry and embraced by the ignorant.

^^ Yup it doesn't fit the liberal narrative so clearly the archeologist are wrong I guess there wrong about the ice ages . So that's some special critical thinking right there BAFFNOONS ,,,,

assup is a snot head.


archeologists will find his fossilized remains and wonder why he has so much fossilized snot up his ass.

Again questions the climate change critical thinkers don't address. The low high temp record on 8/11/18 was 77 breaking the record FROM 8/11/1906 of 78 . So the computer models of climate change ( that they were paid billions to show climate change) are again wrong But nobody asks any questions about record lower temps from 112 years ago. Agee could it just be WEATHER,,,

Who was paid how many billions to do this?

Can’t just pull figures out of thin air, even if that air is Fox News.

Polar bear shot dead after attacking cruise ship tour guide as climate change pushes predators closer to human habitats

https://www.yahoo.com/news/polar-bea...101052565.html

The wingnuts will never cease to amaze me!

Do you think anyone will read the article? It rebuts the headline.

The normal common folks aren't stupid. When they realize just how perverted the leftist thugs are, what do the thugs think will happen? The fascist minions love this stuff. I pray they stay in the minority.

For those that don't want to read the article, a cruise ship tour went ashore on a remote island that has an abundance of polar bears. A bear was hungry, and proximate to the landing. The guide thought he could ignore the bear. The bear decided to eat him. Another guide shot the bear.

Anyone who knows anything about polar bears would say this is a fundamentally predictable outcome, likely to occur in this situation.

Attributing this to global warming is fascist propaganda proffered by racebaiting fascist thugs.

kehaar Originally Posted by kehaar

That's the way Liberals look at it. The truth though, it's not Global Warming pushing predators towards humans, it's stupid humans invading the predators habitat. Since Polar Bears are predators it's their nature to hunt for survival. Humans in their environment become easy prey.

Jim

Yup^^ To answer YR question , first I sadly understand that type of person No matter how congent the question Is answered he will call BS then go on the personal attack.
Al Gore/ Rachel Carson , and now the feds NOAA/ NWS is still spending tax payer monies.
I suggested several books on the topic before , but again just off the top of my head.
The really inconvenient truths Iain Murray
The politically incorrect guide to Global warming and the environmentalism Chris Horner
Why the free market works and other half baked theories don't John Lott
The way adult education works is to understand the available information from both sides , and common people will understand the scam. So go back to the (one) tree ring and the models.

What personal attacks are you referring to?

Simply questioning a claim made in the context of a debate is not a personal attack. However, failure or refusal to substantiate a claim is the sign of a losing argument.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/12...st-bridge.html

Global warming?

Who was paid how many billions to do this?

Can’t just pull figures out of thin air, even if that air is Fox News. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

you asked. here you go ...



http://www.climatedollars.org/full-s...SAAEgLc-vD_BwE


U.S. Government Funding of Climate Change




"The United States government has spent enormous sums on global warming/climate change issues, including science research, although the ocean of funding is so large, fed by so many rivers of tax dollars, that it’s hard to tally it all up."


166 BILLION

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/12...st-bridge.html

Global warming? Originally Posted by bamscram

Are you making a scientific statement that the flood in New Jersey was caused by global warming?

Have you checked your source there, buckaroo?

Better put on a foil hat first.

One wild conspiracy after another.

How hard do you have to look to find stuff like that?

Have you checked your source there, buckaroo?

Better put on a foil hat first.

One wild conspiracy after another.

How hard do you have to look to find stuff like that? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Are you making a scientific statement that the flood in New Jersey was caused by global warming?

This is a very simple and straightforward question.

If the answer is yes, that you are making a scientific statement that global warming caused that flood, the utter irrationality of your decision making process is laid bare.

If the answer is no, you are guilty of proffering hate filled lies with the purpose of foisting a destructive political agenda on our society.

Which is it?