Drumpf wants to use nukes. Yeah, I'm feeling safer already.

Just checking back in .... is it generally accepted now ....

... that using nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive strike is ok?

So long as the recipient has nukes and is in "loaded and locked" mode. Originally Posted by LexusLover

No it isn't. But don't tell Assup let him stool in his own shit pile for awhile.

Jim

....this thread is scary... Truly stupid, dangerous shit, and some here should know better. Originally Posted by Old-T

Take it easy cowboy, it's not your last rodeo... you just need to learn how to channel your inner Trump, er, I mean Slim Pickens...

No it isn't. But don't tell Assup let him stool in his own shit pile for awhile.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Since I've lived in and around "Ground Zero" for most of my life, I have grown to appreciate the concept of "Preemptive First Strike"!

Since I've lived in and around "Ground Zero" for most of my life, I have grown to appreciate the concept of "Preemptive First Strike"! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Thanks for the chuckle this morning--I am sitting on a bench just outside of Ground Zero as I sip my second cup of coffee. By the way, it is being renovated and has one of those generic "reopening soon" signs.

Thanks for the chuckle this morning--I am sitting on a bench just outside of Ground Zero as I sip my second cup of coffee. By the way, it is being renovated and has one of those generic "reopening soon" signs. Originally Posted by Old-T

The early days of ICBM's and the concept of strike launches reminded me of the "rain of arrows' in the old medieval days...



"Ground Zero" was an "expanded" area...especially with MIRVs ... although in the "early days" the "independently targetable" functions needed improvement ... particularly from the Soviet.