Why A Yes Vote For The Iran Nuclear Deal Is A No-Brainer

You dumbfuck libtards are as blind as bats and as naive as 3 year olds. Saddam Hussein was so paranoid about Iran that he exaggerated his WMD arsenals so he didn't look weak to them. He already had a significant nuclear program prior to Desert Storm. If we had left him in power do you really think he would have sat there and twiddled his thumbs while Iran's nuclear program advanced by leaps and bounds over the last dozen years? No. Fucking. Way. Today we would be trying to stop 2 nuke programs instead of one! So thank W for eliminating one of the problems! And stop blaming him for Odumbo's inability to rid us of the other one!

.

You dumbfuck libtards are blind as bats. Saddam Hussein was so paranoid about Iran that he exaggerated his WMD arsenals so he didn't look weak to them. He already had a significant nuclear program prior to Desert Storm. If we had left him in power do you really think he would have sat there and twiddled hi thumbs while Iran's nuclear program advanced by leaps and bounds over the last dozen years? No. Fucking. Way. Today we would be trying to stop 2 nuke programs instead of one! So thank W for eliminating one of the problems! And stop blaming him for Odumbo's inability to rid us of the other one!

. Originally Posted by lustylad

Is twiddle hi thumbs one of the games you swishy walkers play down at the dumpster when it's slow? Maybe, just maybe, we could have let Iran take Sodamn out, saved us some lives in the process. You're using revisionist history and have no idea what really would have happened. Anything could have transpired. There's no guess what a fucking nut will do when cornered. Iran's program hasn't transpired by leaps and bounds over the last 12 years. And I won't thank W for a goddamn thing, mission accomplished cocksucker.

It seems that the republicans in Congress, would rather Iran keep their Uranium and get a nuclear bomb in a year or two. Instead of rolling back Iran's capability to produce a nuclear weapon.

Regardless of what the USA does, Iran will getting some of their money back. The other countries are going forward, with or without the USA. Originally Posted by flghtr65

You are a liar and fool. The Republicans want a better, more verifiable deal. Why do you trust the Iranians who continue to cheat and break treaties and fund terrorism?

Link to the Supreme Leader chanting death to America Originally Posted by WTF

http://nypost.com/2015/03/23/irans-s...nuclear-talks/

There moronic buffoon. It took you five years to learn how to post a link.

You are a liar and fool. The Republicans want a better, more verifiable deal. Why do you trust the Iranians who continue to cheat and break treaties and fund terrorism?



http://nypost.com/2015/03/23/irans-s...nuclear-talks/

There moronic buffoon. It took you five years to learn how to post a link. Originally Posted by gnadfly

And how exactly do you get a more verifiable deal with a people you don't trust?

You're using revisionist history and have no idea what really would have happened. Anything could have transpired. There's no guess what a fucking nut will do when cornered. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Hahahaha....

Funny how you libtards are so quick and eager to insist everything would have been better if we had just stayed out of Iraq, but when I point out how it could have been WORSE you dismiss it as "using revisionist history"! If you truly believe "anything could have transpired" then stop pretending you KNOW what would have transpired. On the other hand, if you prefer to speculate and be an armchair revisionist historian, then you need to ponder how different Iraq would look today if Odumbo hadn't pulled out all of our forces in 2011.

Take your pick - you're the one who is cornered, sewer rat.

.

And how exactly do you get a more verifiable deal with a people you don't trust? Originally Posted by WombRaider

interesting point! maybe we shouldn't trust them at all?

Iran's program hasn't transpired by leaps and bounds over the last 12 years. Originally Posted by WombRaider

I said it has "advanced" by leaps and bounds, not "transpired". The graphs tell the story, you grubered freelance faggot Odumbo minion from Arkansas. You already had your ass handed to you on this one in previous threads. If you're smart, you'll quit now.







.

You're using revisionist history and have no idea what really would have happened. Anything could have transpired. There's no guess what a fucking nut will do when cornered. Originally Posted by WombRaider

On this point retiring Gen. Odierno is in agreement, you grubered freelance faggot Odumbo minion from Arkansas. But not in a good way....


“All I know is that Saddam Hussein was an incredibly ruthless person who was suppressing his population. And I know that there has always been this argument we went in there and there no nuclear weapons, and there were no ... here's what I will tell you. I talked to all, I said this for years, I talked to all the Iraqi generals. They’ll tell you there were nuclear weapons. You know, they believed there were. So, I mean, the bottom line is, they absolutely believe there were nuclear weapons on the ground. So, to say we shouldn’t have went in there now because we know there wasn’t any or we didn’t find any, I think is a little bit of hindsight. Oh, and by-the-way, we don’t know where we would be right now if Saddam Hussein was still in power. He was moving toward terrorism and I believe if he continued to have problems, you don’t know what he might have done in terms of being part of the problem with terrorism.” General Ray Odierno, 12 August 2015

http://www.c-span.org/video/?c454798...-back-iraq-war

.

I said it has "advanced" by leaps and bounds, not "transpired". The graphs tell the story, you grubered freelance faggot Odumbo minion from Arkansas. You already had your ass handed to you on this one in previous threads. If you're smart, you'll quit now.







. Originally Posted by lustylad

I do remember you getting your ass handed to you on this one. Better quit now is right. They're still a long way from a weapon that can be delivered anywhere. And you're one of the ones who said the sanctions were working. If they increased their nuclear program, how exactly were the sanctions working? Can't have it both ways now Lusty Tard. Better call the 'engorger'. It's fitting to get dirty.

Translation: That really makes me squirm because I know there is a lot of truth in it.

A hyperbole and a lie are 2 different things - one exaggerates the truth, the other denies it. Can't be both. Which is it, fagboy?

. Originally Posted by lustylad

In this case it was an exaggerated lie , you partially aborted, shit for brains human vacuum dick guzzling sperm receptor .

So thank W for eliminating one of the problems!

. Originally Posted by lustylad

On this point retiring Gen. Odierno is in agreement, you grubered freelance faggot Odumbo minion from Arkansas. But not in a good way....


“All I know is that Saddam Hussein was an incredibly ruthless person who was suppressing his population. And I know that there has always been this argument we went in there and there no nuclear weapons, and there were no ... here's what I will tell you. I talked to all, I said this for years, I talked to all the Iraqi generals. They’ll tell you there were nuclear weapons. You know, they believed there were. So, I mean, the bottom line is, they absolutely believe there were nuclear weapons on the ground. So, to say we shouldn’t have went in there now because we know there wasn’t any or we didn’t find any, I think is a little bit of hindsight. Oh, and by-the-way, we don’t know where we would be right now if Saddam Hussein was still in power. He was moving toward terrorism and I believe if he continued to have problems, you don’t know what he might have done in terms of being part of the problem with terrorism.” General Ray Odierno, 12 August 2015

http://www.c-span.org/video/?c454798...-back-iraq-war

. Originally Posted by lustylad

lol LL, you don't seriously expect womby to give any credence to the statements of a 4 star General do ya?




looks like a guy i'd trust.


my new favorite phrase .. "Rarely is the question asked, is Womby learning?"

lol LL, you don't seriously expect womby to give any credence to the statements of a 4 star General do ya?




looks like a guy i'd trust.


my new favorite phrase .. "Rarely is the question asked, is Womby learning?" Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I gave credit to several generals in the hiroshima thread, you shit all over them at that time. I guess it's whenever it suits you...

In this case it was an exaggerated lie , you partially aborted, shit for brains human vacuum dick guzzling sperm receptor . Originally Posted by WTF

Can't be both when he's a half-gay shitsipper who's a bottom that tries to top

I gave credit to several generals in the hiroshima thread, you shit all over them at that time. I guess it's whenever it suits you... Originally Posted by WombRaider

i don't recall that thread turning out well for you either. unless of course to show your America hating ass for what it is.

i don't recall that thread on Corporate pollution turning out well for you either.

in fact, no thread you post in turns out well for you. Maybe you should give up?