Vance- guy changes his opinion as often as he changes his name. Literally onto the next lie from the previous. I will say I found him agreeable - even likable during most of the debate where he was approachable, and even likable. But as I previously stated I felt waltz did a much better job of welcoming the population watching into the conversation. Versus being slick.
Americans aren't stupid in general. They trust their gut and I think Waltz spoke directly to them vs a hope n dream of a return to drama and assholism.
Originally Posted by eyecu2
what does "welcoming the population watching into the conversation" mean? lol you are parroting the MSDNC spin per Rachel Maddow. she literally said that in the post debate video i posted. nearly word for word.
what substance did Walz bring? none.
By your same standards, Trump won the debate against Harris...and I don't think that was the case.
Originally Posted by SecretE
it isn't that Trump won or not depending on how you view it, it's a fact that Harris lost. she lost her chance to sway undecided voters the biggest X factor in this or any election.
on that point alone, Harris lost.
which is why she's desperate to get another debate and Trump is smart to refuse her the opportunity.
which leaves her only recourse is to give interviews to explain her positions and she's failed miserably at every attempt even in the most friendly environments .. like her townhall with Orca the killer whale.
