[QUOTE=JRLawrence;1061905318]"Physical Description:
crisp leathery skin, damaged from sun exposure and neglect; tastelessly enhanced breasts; disappointing facial appearance
Recommendation: No"
Damn funny too!!!
"Malboraman is right. I get it that the pics are generally a best look for the provider. However, this lady is grossly exzaturated (sp) her profile. This has been pointed out many times. However, in my opinion more reviewers would benefit others with a no."
5587
You are amazing at putting 2 and 2 together to get 96. Not only is your data creepy but probably a complete failure once again. Originally Posted by bigryan2222Hey
I have to jump in. Clearly to each their own. What I'm attracted to doesn't always coincide with others. However, Amy is a blessing in this industry. I know for a fact her pictures are not fake and she does not have management. She is a clean, educated and honest young lady. I feel sorry that she has to go through this. I wish her the best and I assure anyone out there you have nothing to worry about with Amy. Originally Posted by 5587Exactly. I couldn't have said it better. She is 100 pounds soaking wet, perfect skin,ass to die for, flat stomach,nice and affectionate as anybody around. Sad she will never come to this city again. She has joined the long list of just about every respectable, hot, upscale girl in the country. What she has 20 pages of positive reviews and we are supposed to believe one of her few no's, and he never even saw her, and is batting about 10% yes on his recommendations? Ok...lol. And I know the difference between hot or not and will put my encounters up against anybody.