Why don't more people start thought provoking threads?

No i said no one cares what you have to say. I never said anything about what your comment to her was or i would have quoted you. Originally Posted by 124rg

Because secret amore will chime in and tell you your wrong. And no one cares what she has to say . Originally Posted by 124rg

really?.....cause what you said doesn't match what you claim you didn't say....

so yes you did, it's right there in your own words. you claiming i'll chime in and tell scralett she's wrong when I didn't. it was a petty gab.

and again you are being contradictory because obviously you care enough about what i say to make petty gabs so in both post you have been wrong and untrue.

i think you should be more aware of the points your contradicting or arguing before you do.

You give me WAY too much credit, but thanks. Originally Posted by Scarlett De Rossi

I pose this question to you Ms Scarlett...

If a Ho can own a Dog, why can't a Dog own a Ho?

Toyz,

In a single word, sir: Legendary !

BB

I think people don't start more though provoking threads for a few reasons

*a topic they thought of has already been done and people get mad when you ask what to them is the same question multiple times if they've been around long enough
example the why don't providers see black men question that pos up every few months. it IS a thought provoking threads but alas it's been asked some many times people are tired of it

but you know what hasn't been asked (to my knowledge anyways) what's the line between actual preference and prejudice? because in this hobby for those who simply are just prejudice it's easy to say it's my "preference" and who can argue that? who can tell someone it's not their preference, at least without looking like a but hurt argumentative ass?

*thought provoking Q's can seem like a pointless en devours amoungst all the drama and those who are always coming out to needlessly attack and individual (like on this thread, case in point 124rg). remember a couple of months ago when you and claire were posting fun light hearted silly threads to lighten the mood amoungst all the negative drama and a bunch of guys post threAD when that wasn't even what you were doing.

also really only guys can post cause anytime a girl does it's automatically a threAD like the only time a provider makes a thread is to get attention for more business instead of simply just participating like everyone else

*thought provoking question threads often appear during 2 periods of time when there's alot of drama and someone post something to break it up and lighten the negative storm cloud (like this thread) OR when most if not ever thread has already been talked to death and there' pretty much a lul in active conversation so in an effort to recessitat someone post a TPQ

really?.....cause what you said doesn't match what you claim you didn't say....

so yes you did, it's right there in your own words. you claiming i'll chime in and tell scralett she's wrong when I didn't. it was a petty gab.

and again you are being contradictory because obviously you care enough about what i say to make petty gabs so in both post you have been wrong and untrue.

i think you should be more aware of the points your contradicting or arguing before you do. Originally Posted by Secret_Amore

I never said nor ment to imply you were saying scarlett was wrong what i was saying in you always pop up to tell everyone how they should see things or think about shit and no one cares to hear it. i was answering her question. stating that you always seem to jump in and tell people (not her) in general how you see it and they are wrong now if i cared enough or had time to i would dig through all your posts and show you but i dont want to waste that kid of time on you. Thanks and learn how to read what people are saying and not what the hell you want them to say. good day.

The only person that came to visit was a hobbyist.

Aww, that's nice ...what did you charge him?

That there is funny!

Anyone else think of the SNL skit "Deep thoughts with Jack Handy" when they read the title of this thread?
Just a little levity brought in on this "provoking" thread....

HB

I never said nor ment to imply you were saying scarlett was wrong what i was saying in you always pop up to tell everyone how they should see things or think about shit and no one cares to hear it. i was answering her question. stating that you always seem to jump in and tell people (not her) in general how you see it and they are wrong now if i cared enough or had time to i would dig through all your posts and show you but i dont want to waste that kid of time on you. Thanks and learn how to read what people are saying and not what the hell you want them to say. good day. Originally Posted by 124rg

you were replying to scarlett question, because you were answering her question engaging her, you were directing it at her aswell. and your response was i will always chime in and tell you're wrong (which is inaccurate anyways because I often agree with people aswell). but you're probably basing that assumption off the cbc thread when i told someone they were wrong because they were. the fact that it was a public comment includes the "general" public it doesn't exclude the OP

oh and i point out not one sideded perspectives that often times aren't my own. just because I'm the one who points out a different side of things doesn't mean that's how i personally view it or think. which is exactly what i told someone else when he wrongly assumed the same thing, but that's your assumption to make.

Y'all kin lead a horsedick ta water but ya can't make 'im thank!

Attachment 303524

Miss Scarlett, I sincerely apologize about your sore leg.... I just got carried away.

But I'm not giving a heartfelt thanks since you didn't wear this panda costume.

[QUOTE=Toyz;1055179897]I pose this question to you Ms Scarlett...

If a Ho can own a Dog, why can't a Dog own a Ho?



While I find your images of beastiality and children being depicted in an illegal and disgusting way seriously disturbing and counter productive, I will answer your question.

I am a hoe and my last dog totally owned me.

He was spoiled rotten and I took care of his every need. He was my best friend, guardian and protector. And Yeah, he totally owned me!

Some input from a couple that do not post much.....

"Why try to start a thought provoking thread when there are those that feel the need for attention so much that they try to turn everything brought up into a joke to get their laughs at the expense of something that might have been important to me?"

Some input from a couple that do not post much.....

"Why try to start a thought provoking thread when there are those that feel the need for attention so much that they try to turn everything brought up into a joke to get their laughs at the expense of something that might have been important to me?" Originally Posted by Whispers

---------------

I have tons more stories, but want to hear yours. Originally Posted by Scarlett De Rossi

You can read ours in the Reviews! What? You want us to record you a talking book?

We don't start more thought provoking threads because our heads (both little and big) are filled with thoughts of.... well, you know what... and all our "thinking" time is spent planning our next session and making sure if she NCNSs we have a second or third backup. Sheesh, you ask a hell of a lot of us (other than being your $$$ ATM with a penis).

[QUOTE=Scarlett De Rossi;1055183908]

While I find your images of beastiality and children being depicted in an illegal and disgusting way seriously disturbing and counter productive, I will answer your question. Originally Posted by Toyz

Not sure I'd classify them as "images of beastiality and children". To me they were more "cartoon carnality", after all it was a flying squirrel, a talking moose and a talking genius dog. "Disturbing and counter productive" possibly, but I'm glad you took the high road and answered his question.

BTW, I think I wanna be your dog (when I grow up).