Hypothetical Question

So, if I'm reading your post correctly, what you are saying is that it's acceptable to write a fraudulent review for whatever reason (just as an example, let's say trying to inflate your P411 OK's)? I don't believe that most of the guys on here would agree with that. Doesn't the integrity of the review system depend on HONEST sharing of information? If I misread your thoughts, please enlighten me. Originally Posted by stimulatethemind

NO, reread what I wrote with the cum outta your eyes
I did not say a review could be false
I said the review is the SWORN statement of what happened,(which means it has to be accurate)
anything outside the review is just rumor/jibber jabber

Almost all reviews would seem to have something fraudulent in them. Most of seem to over exaggerate our abilities on a regular basis. You have to take every review and throw out some of the obvious BS to come up with what actually happened. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

what?
so when a guy says.
..."She said I had to go slow cause Im so big"
..She had many Os cause my tool is like a baby's arm with an apple on top
she told me I was the biggest she's ever had...and 2nd biggest and 3rd biggest(its that big)

that those might be false statements?

No way!

BTW, I only said those statements because I've been told them 1st hand

NO, did not say a review could be false
I said the review is the SWORN statement of what happened,(which means it has to be accurate)
anything outside the review is just rumor/jibber jabber Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

Says the guy with no reviews.

Thank you so much for pointing out who the mythical hypocrite reminds me of.. Nice to know you empathize with Mr Sterling..while you're at it, what was/are your previous handle(s) ? Originally Posted by malwoody

I am not condoning what sterling said, I'm laughing at the media blow up about it,.
his actions already got him 1 naacp award,he was about to get his 2nd for money he's given to the naacp.

now this happened, (OMG HE SAID HE DIDNT LIKE BLACKS!1 OMG OMG OMG)
think he's going to give naacp more money?
he expressed an opinion, and the media blew it up for shits and grins, HIs money won't be helping anymore NAACP recipients cause they won't have it...
I guess words are stronger than actions



I do think the stuff he said to the albino about Magic was just an old man ranting and the media shouldnt have aired that shit, but they wanted their "story" about the old man. in the end, it was the media that aired his rants against magic. NEWS at 11, crazy 80yo man sounds off against the world!(oh boy news!)


funny how I can't fire you for being catholic/jewish, female/male, but I can fire you just cause ....no reason at all, (but really its cause your irish , but I wont say that, so I can do it)

BTW why do you have to wear nice clothes to court?
I thought the justice system was blindfold so it could be objectively, without fear or favor, regardless of identity, money, power, or weakness; blind justice and impartiality..but I can't wear a sweatpants to court? what gives?

Says the guy with no reviews. Originally Posted by Anacondadong

I dont need reviews on this board to be correct
Am I wrong?
nope, dont think so

I dont need reviews on this board to be correct
Am I wrong?
nope, dont think so Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

Better post a pic with a notary proving it is you...LOL

Better post a pic with a notary proving it is you...LOL Originally Posted by i'va biggen

huh do you know what those words mean?
LLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

Apparently you don't...LMAO

NO, reread what I wrote with the cum outta your eyes
I did not say a review could be false
I said the review is the SWORN statement of what happened,(which means it has to be accurate)
anything outside the review is just rumor/jibber jabber Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

Is it rumor/jibber jabber when it is posted in the Men's Lounge (which is SUPPOSED to be private)? So, in your view, it's ok to post a glowing review with a "yes" recommendation and then write nasty, vile things about the lady in the ML?

Oh, that's right, you don't have access to the ML. You really shouldn't comment on things which you know nothing about. Oh yeah, that's never stopped you before, has it?

QUOTE=CryptKicker;1055332081]{MOD hat off---}
I'm going to disagree some here. The review system is designed to give good and bad about a provider. As long as the reviewer is giving the negative from the factual side and not from a personal conflict side, then those reviews should be in public in the review forum (with the appropriate ROS privacy). If a lady suddenly is off her game and giving crap service then I want a review about it. If a lady starts a NSNC string it needs to be posted. Some of these ladies that give bad service and NSNC need to know we are not afraid to post about it. It won't hurt their income if they correct the problems and if they don't correct it, do we honestly care about their income?[/QUOTE]

We all know, but most will not say, that some of the reviews are really advertisements for some people. I can not say that reviews are not to be trusted, but I can say that when some reviews are read and one gets that little feeling of doubt; just set it aside with a note that we don't know as much as we want to know.

The review is neither accepted as true, or rejected as false. It is OK to put it in the we don't know stack. But when a provider gets several of these, a pattern has been established.

Same thing for the guys. Same thing for strange behavior. Homework is gathering facts, when all of the facts can not be known. Homework is not just reading and believing what some guy says about a girl, we all know some guys are jerks.

But certain ladies seem to never, ever, have a negative remark from anyone, or a stupid comment from themselves, and, that is good.

Most of the ladies in my will not see folder have revealed themselves not to be ladies. So, just make a note and go on.

Note, I never write reviews. I have asked some ladies if they would like one, and for some reasons none of them were really interested. But then I tend to search for UTR ladies.

JR

Better to write no review at all than a glowing review that is not true.

I use to write reviews, honest and forth-write. I soon became tired of fending off WKs who took umbrage to something I said, so I stopped writing reviews. I will write one only if requested by the provider.

That's not to say if I get ripped off or hit another untenable situation that I would stay silent about it - then I would let people know.

Is it rumor/jibber jabber when it is posted in the Men's Lounge (which is SUPPOSED to be private)? So, in your view, it's ok to post a glowing review with a "yes" recommendation and then write nasty, vile things about the lady in the ML?

Oh, that's right, you don't have access to the ML. You really shouldn't comment on things which you know nothing about. Oh yeah, that's never stopped you before, has it? Originally Posted by stimulatethemind

The review is where you find reviews, anyplace else is jibber jabber

Why would i need access to ML to know a review is the place to honest remarks about a provider in the section for those reviews?
oh yeah, you dont have common sense, do ya?
what are your previous names again?
Eh?

The review is where you find reviews, anyplace else is jibber jabber

Why would i need access to ML to know a review is the place to honest remarks about a provider in the section for those reviews?
oh yeah, you dont have common sense, do ya?
what are your previous names again?
Eh? Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

You truly are a moron. Is your goal to piss every single member of this board off?

BTW, Without premium access you can't even read the real details of a review.

You truly are a moron. Is your goal to piss every single member of this board off?

BTW, Without premium access you can't even read the real details of a review. Originally Posted by bp6570

I actually think he is trying to be funny, but failing miserably. Otherwise, he truly is "gifted".

About time for another member to go on the ignore list.

The review is where you find reviews, anyplace else is jibber jabber

Why would i need access to ML to know a review is the place to honest remarks about a provider in the section for those reviews?
oh yeah, you dont have common sense, do ya?
what are your previous names again?
Eh? Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

I have no previous handles here, unlike yourself. Why not give up yours?

You, sir, are a skidmark on the underwear of society.