Circumcision?

That extra bit of skin can hold bodily fluids in which can make it easier to contract an STD, not as easy as a vagina. With that being said, I've been with a small handful of uncircumcised men and it didn't bother me. None of them smelled bad and they didn't have a problem wearing condoms. BJ's were fun too.

Seems like an enterprising inventor could modify a pair of electronic nose hair clippers to do the job and make a fortune. Designed appropriately, it also might serve as a sex toy. Of course, it it worked well, it might put a crimp in providers' income.

In the absence of a good toy, I suspect some gentlemen might be willing to do an upcharge to have the provider get the "jam" out. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

I thought you said: No smart comments...LOL!

Funny, this was on my mind today for some reason.

I've heard women refer to uncut penises (penii?) as anteaters. That makes me glad my parents were assholes and had me mutilated at birth. Or not. Lots of people crying foul about African female genital mutilations, but not so much about men.

I always figured if your parents didn't have some fucked up bass-ackwards religious reason, it was just because they were too lazy to do the cleaning. Or they wanted to ignore having the uncomfortable conversation on the subject of hygiene like they ignore masturbation and sex in general.

I was a medic many years ago, so I've had occasion to see a few penii in a clinical setting, and while I didn't get that close to them, I did notice that the uncut elderly from the nursing homes needed a little extra cleaning before starting a catheter and some would get really bad infections, but there wasn't anything remarkable about the rest of them. I guess my point is, it's probably a lot like armpits or ear canals or belly buttons, and you just learn to clean them daily in the shower and it's all good.

But mostly I'm just pissed that I don't have a built in pocket pussy. Now I'm gonna have to drop 80 bucks on a Fleshlight when I gear up to go back overseas in a couple of months. Grrr.

That extra bit of skin can hold bodily fluids in which can make it easier to contract an STD, not as easy as a vagina. Originally Posted by anova444

There have been some studies in developed countries that have shown no significant differences in STD infections between circumcised and uncircumcised men, and if you look at the STD statistics for the US (high circumcision rate) and Western Europe (low circumcision rate) they are pretty comparable. HIV rates are actually higher in the US. A lot of the studies you hear about in the news are from Africa, but even those aren't really clear cut since there are several African countries (Cameroon, Rwanda, Ghana, etc.) where circumcised men are more likely to be HIV positive than uncircumcised men.

As for "technical differences", I wouldn't think many adjustments would have to be made in technique. I guess handjobs would be the main exception depending on the guy's preferences and sensitivity level.

Our young sons and daughters may face a different playing field, since circumcision rates in the US dropped from 56.2% in 2006 to 32.5% in 2009.

Funny, this was on my mind today for some reason.

I've heard women refer to uncut penises (penii?) as anteaters. That makes me glad my parents were assholes and had me mutilated at birth. Or not. Lots of people crying foul about African female genital mutilations, but not so much about men.

I always figured if your parents didn't have some fucked up bass-ackwards religious reason, it was just because they were too lazy to do the cleaning. Or they wanted to ignore having the uncomfortable conversation on the subject of hygiene like they ignore masturbation and sex in general.

I was a medic many years ago, so I've had occasion to see a few penii in a clinical setting, and while I didn't get that close to them, I did notice that the uncut elderly from the nursing homes needed a little extra cleaning before starting a catheter and some would get really bad infections, but there wasn't anything remarkable about the rest of them. I guess my point is, it's probably a lot like armpits or ear canals or belly buttons, and you just learn to clean them daily in the shower and it's all good.

But mostly I'm just pissed that I don't have a built in pocket pussy. Now I'm gonna have to drop 80 bucks on a Fleshlight when I gear up to go back overseas in a couple of months. Grrr. Originally Posted by IronMike

It looks more like a turtle neck to me. I'm just sayin'.

Female circumcision: I read an article about an African girl that was circumcised in an extreme manor. Everything that protruded genitalia wise was removed. When her wounds healed, they healed in a way that her vaginal opening was not much wider than her urinary opening. This caused vaginal infections from urine build up, and pain from menstrual blockage. That's an extreme instance.
In most cases, the clitoris is removed, subsequently, pleasure and desire is removed. A large amount of women do not have vaginal orgasms. The ones who do, myself included, need external stimulation to get the juices and energy flowing. What I'm getting at is that it may be bad to circumcise men and if there is real proof I would like to see it. circumcising a female by removing her clitoris and in some cases, every thing that protrudes(labia minor, and labia major) IS horrific.
Circumcised males can have an orgasm. I've witnessed some glorious male orgasms.
Circumcises female can not achieve an orgasm. I don't know the percentage of orgasm to no orgasm but I bet it's 1% or less. Sorry to be a buzz kill.

Love,
Ana

What the hell does one say in reply to this thread when one has been circumcised TWICE!! (First one at age 34)

abdclub
Trust me ... sensitivity goes down with circumcision! I know!!!!!

Why did you get circumcised at 34? Did you have a tumor on your turtleneck?

Just kidding, I couldn't help it.

Love,
Analisa

It looks more like a turtle neck to me. I'm just sayin'.

Female circumcision: I read an article about an African girl that was circumcised in an extreme manor. Everything that protruded genitalia wise was removed. When her wounds healed, they healed in a way that her vaginal opening was not much wider than her urinary opening. This caused vaginal infections from urine build up, and pain from menstrual blockage. That's an extreme instance.
In most cases, the clitoris is removed, subsequently, pleasure and desire is removed. A large amount of women do not have vaginal orgasms. The ones who do, myself included, need external stimulation to get the juices and energy flowing. What I'm getting at is that it may be bad to circumcise men and if there is real proof I would like to see it. circumcising a female by removing her clitoris and in some cases, every thing that protrudes(labia minor, and labia major) IS horrific.
Circumcised males can have an orgasm. I've witnessed some glorious male orgasms.
Circumcises female can not achieve an orgasm. I don't know the percentage of orgasm to no orgasm but I bet it's 1% or less. Sorry to be a buzz kill.

Love,
Ana Originally Posted by anova444

Word! And this to those who do it

Funny, this was on my mind today for some reason.

I've heard women refer to uncut penises (penii?) as anteaters. That makes me glad my parents were assholes and had me mutilated at birth. Or not. Lots of people crying foul about African female genital mutilations, but not so much about men.

I always figured if your parents didn't have some fucked up bass-ackwards religious reason, it was just because they were too lazy to do the cleaning. Or they wanted to ignore having the uncomfortable conversation on the subject of hygiene like they ignore masturbation and sex in general. Originally Posted by IronMike

Comparing male circumcision to female circumcision denigrates the horror of mutilating female children solely to deprive them of sexual pleasure. It is barbaric practice that is a far cry from the routine removal of the foreskin from a male infant.

Comparing male circumcision to female circumcision denigrates the horror of mutilating female children solely to deprive them of sexual pleasure. It is barbaric practice that is a far cry from the routine removal of the foreskin from a male infant. Originally Posted by awl4knot

Yep....

apples & oranges

Just like the Jews on this board go apeshit when a Hitler apologist posts...

...if we had board members that had family members that underwent the female version of this all hell would have broken loose relative to the comparison the previous poster made....

Well AtlComedy, I think we did have something to say about it though I can't speak for our Jewish brothers.

I've had the issue with a few gentlemen not being so...fresh in that area due to a lack of attention. Not many, but a few.

The fun part though (and there is a fun part) is the sensitivity during BJ. If you're spring fresh...I'm in. And when I'm with an uncircumcised gentleman and he reacts to the feeling of extra sensation while I'm paying homage to jr., its like a new toy. Circumcised men enjoy BJs just fine...but you'll never get the same response with them as you do with one who is "uncut". Originally Posted by Nina Rae

I had a civie relationship with a uncut man that did not enjoy BJ's.


Yes, you heard me correctly, there ACTUALLY is a man in this world who does NOT like BJ's. From what he discussed with me it had to do with over-sensitivity. He wasn't much of a "giver" either. It was a very sexually unsatisfying relationship and I stayed in it.........way too long. Sex does say a lot about personality.

Shiiiiiiiit If I didn't like BJs Id get cut in a heartbeat!! What the hell is the man waiting on!!

I have seen posts on boards from uncut gents saying that they prefer being uncut....or touts of things being a better experience....Well I got one question who is the guy that did the study....I'm glad I got cut early (im sad that they cut too much). But I think discussion about cut and uncut is silly...other than pointing out the obvious hygiene issues

I had a civie relationship with a uncut man that did not enjoy BJ's.


Yes, you heard me correctly, there ACTUALLY is a man in this world who does NOT like BJ's. From what he discussed with me it had to do with over-sensitivity. He wasn't much of a "giver" either. It was a very sexually unsatisfying relationship and I stayed in it.........way too long. Sex does say a lot about personality. Originally Posted by tylorblake