I agree with CG, the view count goes up and more comments are made on reviews that have PICS INSIDE in the title of the review, and hopefully, the pics are session pics, not of ones in her showcase or previous ads.
For the ladies who demand privacy and total discreetness, I understand and do not have harsh word to say about you not wanting to have a pic or two taken by a client. However, what is really strange is when a provider has pics in her showcase and/or ads she places, unless the pics in her showcase/ads are cropped, edited and/or far outdated and the provider does not want anything current and unedited to be seen. What is really peculiar is other reviewers have taken pics of her in their first review of her by him, and she denies others to do so, guess it is also similar in theory to who she picks and chooses to play the YMMV card on in a session.
I would not blame her if a guy was known to distribute said pics without her knowledge and consent. What ladies have to realize if they do not already know, that any guy with PA can see the pics put in the reviews, right click and save them, and just as any member, PA or not, can do the same with their pics in her showcase and in ads she places and do what he wants w/o any repercussions on him.
I agree it does take a lot of trust to let a guy take pics, especially the full nude and uncensored/mid-session and action photos/videos, for him not to post them or she is oblivious to the perils of the world wide web. But a couple of pre-chosen, clothed or maybe topless pre-session pics should be good to post in the ROS of the review, as it gives a more credit and realization to the review and reviewer. Most reviews can be used as ads for the provider, and a review with known current pics are the best ads for her, kinda like this review:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1132341