Addressing some things

Ha some of y'all are silly. She could have had another appointment with a gentleman with a clean dick. Offering back half of the money is generous for wasting her time. If you have a fucked up dick, why book? Lol

in my opinion she is very professional and was generous in this circumstance. Originally Posted by Holly Love

Said "fucked up dick" from Omaha has been in the orifices of many local providers and they gave him stellar references. This is not the case of a "fucked up" dick; this is the case of a "fucked up" provider who should have given both guys their money back. Bullshit on the other appointment. If he pounds on the door of the incall, in a way that makes her think it might be LE, is she opening the door asking for $120? No! She's "self-preserving" in whatever way possible, and not worrying about the money. If she was really worried about either guy's "fucked up" dick, she should have completely declined service and been a decent human being about it.

From a business standpoint, she fucked up too. If she had refunded the guys money, she would have been out $300. I wonder how many guys will now never see her (myself included) because of her priggish ways.....

If you've gotten a bbj then you got inspected. It only takes a sec because your dick is literally in their face and unless they're blind they can figure out pretty quickly if your junk is funky... Originally Posted by mojo2002

Agan. In the case of the Omaha gent, he did have multiple stellar references from reputable local ladies who had no problem with his junk. This is the case of a provider deciding she didn't want to do anything with this guy's junk except a handjob, and in both cases an expensive handjob. Again, that's fine, she can choose to "opt out" but she should not charge for it. All money should be given back as a good faith gesture. If she had, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Everyone knows that I have assailed (when you look it up make sure you get the correct definition as there are a few for the word) but yes, I have assailed some of Lariyah's policies on race and so forth so I cannot be considered a WK for the following statement (I am probably #1 on her DNS list plus I have no access to the Men's Lounge).

If and only if (that is a big if) the gentleman went to the appointment knowing he was having or does have an issue with his junk then that means he was willing to put her in danger and any one else she may see as well. If he knew of an issue it showed he had no regard for her and thus she should have kept the funds. I remember there was a thread about females being on their periods and guys saying that was bad business for a provider to see clients during her time and put guys in danger and thus they should be able to walk away money in hand. Being that he stayed and let her give him a hand job is a bit telling (I wonder if she used a glove being she said he was having junk bump issues...lol). If it were me and I knew nothing was wrong with my junk then I am protesting and making a fuss to get all my money back. There is no way I am cutting a deal and only taking a funky hand job. I mean really I can do that myself so why pay $120 for it.

I say there is only one way to settle this...an original/untouched picture will not lie. Hell she should have taken one when he was there. But if the gentleman wants to prove his story then he can put all this to rest, save his reputation and prove there is a liar in our midst. I know if it were me I am gonna prove myself right. She sure is defending herself that is what is for sure.

Ha some of y'all are silly. She could have had another appointment with a gentleman with a clean dick. Offering back half of the money is generous for wasting her time. If you have a fucked up dick, why book? Lol

in my opinion she is very professional and was generous in this circumstance. Originally Posted by Holly Love

im assuming you havent seen his junk. if it was clean like he says it was then she is the one that wasted not only his time but also his gas. and if it was not she should have given him his money and sent him on his way. what kind of person gives someone a handjob who has an STD? wtf?

Maybe. But I've never had a provider do either a bill inspection or a "dick" inspection.

You can choose to see who you want to see, but if a gentleman presents himself to you, and you choose not to see him because of the condition of his "junk", you should take NO money from him. None. Nada. By doing so, you are presenting a scam. Originally Posted by Smooth Sailing

+1

Man, Jayhawker really wants a picture of that guy's dick.

what kind of person gives someone a handjob who has an STD? wtf? Originally Posted by amyoto

EXACTLY! AND TWICE at that!

Whoever got that hand next is in for a world of hurt...literally!

Call the client.
Apologize,
And refund ALL the Money.

If you don't, that WAS a Scam... Originally Posted by LoveWomen

Ohh Hello LoveWomen. I was wondering where you have been hiding lately lol.

Why should she have to return all of the rate? He knowingly had that on his private part, and decided to call her anyway with little to no regard for her personal health.

Hypothetically if this situation had ever happened to me then I would refuse too, and I would not return any of the rate because the rate is for my time. Otherwise my rates would be just one standard rate instead of being marked by different time frame slots.

She could have offered to do it covered, but she did the RIGHT and HEALTHY thing to tell him she was NOT going to put herself at risk. Pleasing a man (stranger) for an hour is NEVER worth a lifetime of sickness!

And while we are on the subject of leaks (man I miss that site lol)...

I find it extremely humorous that grown men get so upset about a dorky men's locker room privacy policy. This is a hobby industry board, not the NSA lol. Access to the men's locker room is NOT a matter of national security, or someone gaining access to Level 5 (Mariana's Web) on the dark net lol. Get Over It!

I can't figure out which you men are more angry about:
(1) That some of the providers have gained access to the men's locker room .
OR
(2) That some of the providers are smart enough to gain access to the men's locker room without your permission or knowledge.

Lariyah I am NOT saying that any information was leaked to you, but it is always best to NOT cooperate with the mods by ratting out your source. If this is what might have happened just keep your mouth shut, and just take the temporary punishment/ban. If you rat that man/men out they will have their accounts banned for life. Then you will not have access to the men's locker room anymore. Think this through, and choose to stay silent.

Man, Jayhawker really wants a picture of that guy's dick.

Originally Posted by zeejoe

Even tho we have our differences thanks for the laugh my friend.

Why should she have to return all of the rate? He knowingly had that on his private part, and decided to call her anyway with little to no regard for her personal health. Originally Posted by Urban Dahlia

"knowing had that on his private part" - SERIOUSLY? You do not know what you are talking about and should not take this line of reasoning any further. I will not give details because in the case of the Omaha gent, it is in ROS, but it is safe to say that there was no reason to think that any hooker would question it, especially given his hobbying history and good references.

Hypothetically if this situation had ever happened to me then I would refuse too, and I would not return any of the rate because the rate is for my time. Otherwise my rates would be just one standard rate instead of being marked by different time frame slots.

She could have offered to do it covered, but she did the RIGHT and HEALTHY thing to tell him she was NOT going to put herself at risk. Pleasing a man (stranger) for an hour is NEVER worth a lifetime of sickness! Originally Posted by Urban Dahlia

Again, she has that right, but she has harmed herself more in a business sense by not refunding the money, than she did by refusing to.

I find it extremely humorous that grown men get so upset about a dorky men's locker room privacy policy. This is a hobby industry board, not the NSA lol. Access to the men's locker room is NOT a matter of national security, or someone gaining access to Level 5 (Mariana's Web) on the dark net lol. Get Over It! Originally Posted by Urban Dahlia

Today it's leaking information from the Men's Lounge, tomorrow it's posting RL information on the board. And if it's so dorky, why are all the women so obsessed to find out what's in it? And would you feel the same way if we were leaked information from the powder room?

I can't figure out which you men are more angry about:
(1) That some of the providers have gained access to the men's locker room .
OR
(2) That some of the providers are smart enough to gain access to the men's locker room without your permission or knowledge. Originally Posted by Urban Dahlia

Uh...We know it very well. It's against the board rules. And it doesn't take more than a hooker's brain to figure out how to get there.
1. imply to a guy that he'll get special treatment for leaking information
2. sign up and say you're a man. Pay the Premium access money to do so.
3. sign up and say you're a man. Do a bogus review on yourself or one of your hooker friends and you have access.

So, no, it's not that you are "smart" enough...it's that you are stupid enough to do so.

.... what kind of person gives someone a handjob who has an STD? wtf? Originally Posted by amyoto

Hahahaha right.

im assuming you havent seen his junk. if it was clean like he says it was then she is the one that wasted not only his time but also his gas. and if it was not she should have given him his money and sent him on his way. what kind of person gives someone a handjob who has an STD? wtf? Originally Posted by amyoto

To be fair, no I have not seen the gentleman that I am aware of, nor do I know who it is since I do not nor desire to have access to ML. I have no reason to doubt the Op though. Also as we all know, someone can have an outbreak at one point, and appear to be clean another time. I know this, because I know of a girl who was infected with a life long disease at the ripe age of 18. To be fair to the gentleman, I do not know him, and you're right in that I should not assume. I am familiar with the ops reputation, and the fact that most men will error on the side of the other men. Mehhhh... just the way it goes in this game.

To be fair, no I have not seen the gentleman that I am aware of, nor do I know who it is since I do not nor desire to have access to ML. I have no reason to doubt the Op though. Also as we all know, someone can have an outbreak at one point, and appear to be clean another time. I know this, because I know of a girl who was infected with a life long disease at the ripe age of 18. To be fair to the gentleman, I do not know him, and you're right in that I should not assume. I am familiar with the ops reputation, and the fact that most men will error on the side of the other men. Mehhhh... just the way it goes in this game. Originally Posted by Holly Love

You may be right in most cases. But the "err" is not on the side of the man here..... I'm getting some of my information from the Omaha gent's provider references as well.....

Sooooo....you have actually seen this "fucked up dick"? You know who the gentleman in question is? It seems as if you are assuming quite a bit here..

And you know what they say about that... Originally Posted by malwoody

Yes...it's not very fucking smart....LOL

This is another one of those 'girl power' threads where the girls are only seeing part of the story...and for the girls to stake their reputation on this type of a story, when they don't know what really transpired....not good from a marketing perspective.

On the other hand, it helps us guys to figure out who to see and who not to.

Yes...it's not very fucking smart....LOL

On the other hand, it helps us guys to figure out who to see and who not to. Originally Posted by Kshunter

It's SPAs run AMUCK.....