A specific question for a Provider named FrankieMoore

You're cute Whispers "believing" she outed a member of this board and needing be dealt with when that member (Kingman) openly offered and said many rude things including that he would pop a cap in people's ass, lied, admitted to many things probably against Eccie rules, and even threatened Sarah Smiles after he told her not to post anything.



.
[/B][/LEFT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
Do you see why some girls haven't come forward, he blatantly threatens them after going to their residences?! Hmmm, I guess what's good for the Goose (Kingman and Whispers) isn't good for the Gandor (Providers).

I can see why you've also had issues with other well known Providers in other Texas cities Whispers.. You're somewhat of an instigator and history of being a highly probable Male Chauvinist from what I've just learned researching you.

Everybody have a Great Day, nothing to see here, just Whispers being an idiot again! lol

Besos,
TQ69
Originally Posted by TequilaBesos69
(staff edit; personal information removed; ztonk)


3)He bragged that he was Arab and "of a superior race" and that led to his comments...

4)He said: a) “Come on over I've got alkida Generals camping out in my attic sniping out my drive way for nothing but pure pleasure” then...
b:“Ready set go! First person to find me gets the grand prize of a slug from my chrome into their dome.”

5) He was the one who (innocently or otherwise) made this MUCH MORE THAN AN ISSUE ABOUT 'THEFT OF SERVICES' WHEN HE...
(staff edit; ztonk)


In light of the events today in Paris - It is irrelevant to me where these comments were made. On eccie or to my face. Matters not. It isn't funny and being a dumbass kid does not give you a free pass.

Whispers - Stop making it ALL about 'providers getting their due because they didn't screen properly' - and the integrity of providers for outing clients. You are resorting to lame scenarios that don't even compare to this situation and you are publicly bullying a member of this site (mob mentality, at play?) and coming very close to defaming his character and qualifications as an attorney (Yes, I know him and have for many years). If you wanted a fair discussion - you would have done it in a PM - perhaps you loathe the fact that he garnered some attention and a bit of *gasp* popularity because of his posts?
Intelligence can do that for a man.

IF you had honest-to-God given a shit about the unfairness of a 'Mob Mentality' or truly had a concern about someone being 'outed' - you would have chimed in during the original Alerts thread.

Your consistent pattern is to act like the 'Grand Poobah' and garner ALL the attention for yourself. As long as you can steer the discussion and misrepresent other's comments, then you are all over an 'issue'.

Yet, if you have to share the attention w/ any man that isn't a member of your 'Yes man club' then your benevolent concern for the burning issues that threaten our precious community seem to be, uh...Oh that's right, you just find another city to harass.



Lastly,this is where I will have to explain 'a figure of speech' and how it was used in the alerts thread. Accusations have been bandied about (by Whispers) that various eccie members were encouraging others to commit violence or 'retaliate' against this poor and now victimized lad.
I am first and foremost a US CITIZEN and though I do not believe in vigilante justice (although during my divorce it was a tempting proposition, but, I digress) I DO BELIEVE THAT WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY TO ANSWER TO OUR CONSCIENCE.

If my neighbor was overheard making 'anti-American' violent threats and I knew they already had an assault charge, in their recent past I wouldn't NEED someone's permission to file anonymous report to the FBI or HLS.
The point being made to Stinky...er...Slinkky was that he himself had opened himself up to just that - that we, as patriotic Americans had the right to act on our conscience, if we felt his comments or behavior were a threat.

His behavior of theft +violent history+taunts+flagrant disrespect for women (and the men here)+ threats of violence combined w/ 'anti-american' rhetoric = Not your standard eccie hobbyist. He threw himself under the bus time and time again and it would be every providers/womans prerogative to protect other women from this man or others like him.

If you are not a ticking time-bomb/a threat/someone w/ a history of assault/a rapist/a complete sleazeball/a thief/ and the like, but, are a typical good guy like most on eccie, then please remember that we aren't out to 'out' you.

Geez. I always hear that guys HATE drama...but, guess not!

Besos, I no longer drink, but would love to buy you coffee some time

Aphrodite

Still Looking's Avatar
(staff edit; personal information removed; ztonk)


3)He bragged that he was Arab and "of a superior race" and that led to his comments...

4)He said: a) “Come on over I've got alkida Generals camping out in my attic sniping out my drive way for nothing but pure pleasure” then...
b:“Ready set go! First person to find me gets the grand prize of a slug from my chrome into their dome.”

5) He was the one who (innocently or otherwise) made this MUCH MORE THAN AN ISSUE ABOUT 'THEFT OF SERVICES' WHEN HE...
(staff edit; ztonk)


In light of the events today in Paris - It is irrelevant to me where these comments were made. On eccie or to my face. Matters not. It isn't funny and being a dumbass kid does not give you a free pass.

Whispers - Stop making it ALL about 'providers getting their due because they didn't screen properly' - and the integrity of providers for outing clients. You are resorting to lame scenarios that don't even compare to this situation and you are publicly bullying a member of this site (mob mentality, at play?) and coming very close to defaming his character and qualifications as an attorney (Yes, I know him and have for many years). If you wanted a fair discussion - you would have done it in a PM - perhaps you loathe the fact that he garnered some attention and a bit of *gasp* popularity because of his posts?
Intelligence can do that for a man.

IF you had honest-to-God given a shit about the unfairness of a 'Mob Mentality' or truly had a concern about someone being 'outed' - you would have chimed in during the original Alerts thread.

Your consistent pattern is to act like the 'Grand Poobah' and garner ALL the attention for yourself. As long as you can steer the discussion and misrepresent other's comments, then you are all over an 'issue'.

Yet, if you have to share the attention w/ any man that isn't a member of your 'Yes man club' then your benevolent concern for the burning issues that threaten our precious community seem to be, uh...Oh that's right, you just find another city to harass.



Lastly,this is where I will have to explain 'a figure of speech' and how it was used in the alerts thread. Accusations have been bandied about (by Whispers) that various eccie members were encouraging others to commit violence or 'retaliate' against this poor and now victimized lad.
I am first and foremost a US CITIZEN and though I do not believe in vigilante justice (although during my divorce it was a tempting proposition, but, I digress) I DO BELIEVE THAT WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY TO ANSWER TO OUR CONSCIENCE.

If my neighbor was overheard making 'anti-American' violent threats and I knew they already had an assault charge, in their recent past I wouldn't NEED someone's permission to file anonymous report to the FBI or HLS.
The point being made to Stinky...er...Slinkky was that he himself had opened himself up to just that - that we, as patriotic Americans had the right to act on our conscience, if we felt his comments or behavior were a threat.

His behavior of theft +violent history+taunts+flagrant disrespect for women (and the men here)+ threats of violence combined w/ 'anti-american' rhetoric = Not your standard eccie hobbyist. He threw himself under the bus time and time again and it would be every providers/womans prerogative to protect other women from this man or others like him.

If you are not a ticking time-bomb/a threat/someone w/ a history of assault/a rapist/a complete sleazeball/a thief/ and the like, but, are a typical good guy like most on eccie, then please remember that we aren't out to 'out' you.

Geez. I always hear that guys HATE drama...but, guess not!

Besos, I no longer drink, but would love to buy you coffee some time

Aphrodite

Originally Posted by Aphrodite

I see your undecided about Whispers. Now do me!
LOL...I would but, I don't have time tonight
ztonk's Avatar
  • ztonk
  • 01-07-2015, 08:37 PM
Two guideline reminders are in order:

#5 - Outing or threats of outing are taken seriously. Membership here is anonymous and for the privacy of our members it will remain that way. That means any effort or attempt to connect a person's real world information to their username on this board will be dealt with swiftly and harshly. This includes real names, employment, medical info, addresses past or present, images, criminal or driving record, etc. We expect everyone who participates here to respect and go to great lengths to protect the anonymity and privacy of one another. Reckless disregard or accidental outing will also be taken very seriously.

#7 - Threats of violence or physical harm will not be tolerated under any circumstances. There is no place for that on this board.
ztonk
Whispers's Avatar

Whispers - Stop making it ALL about 'providers getting their due because they didn't screen properly' - and the integrity of providers for outing clients.

That is not what I am doing. Others are bringing those issues to this thread and I am responding to them and reminding people of what is at the root of it all....

You are resorting to lame scenarios that don't even compare to this situation and you are publicly bullying a member of this site (mob mentality, at play?) and coming very close to defaming his character and qualifications as an attorney

I do not believe any practicing Attorney would have involved himself in the manner he did without any facts to base it on. But what I am really addressing is how he methodically went about outing a member of this site. If he is an attorney and I defamed him in some manner I can anticipate hearing from him.

(Yes, I know him and have for many years).

Your saying it so does not make it so.

If you wanted a fair discussion - you would have done it in a PM - perhaps you loathe the fact that he garnered some attention and a bit of *gasp* popularity because of his posts?

I wanted an open discussion minus details of anyone's life on the practice of outing someone and his misleading and inaccurate statements about the guy outed.

IF you had honest-to-God given a shit about the unfairness of a 'Mob Mentality' or truly had a concern about someone being 'outed' - you would have chimed in during the original Alerts thread.

I advised the ringleader prior to it occurring that it should be handled off the board and was not aware of it until just a short period before it was pulled. I don't read every thread in every forum.... However there is no doubt that it needed to be pulled so I did not waste my words in the thread.

Your consistent pattern is to act like the 'Grand Poobah' and garner ALL the attention for yourself. As long as you can steer the discussion and misrepresent other's comments, then you are all over an 'issue'.

I have not misrepresented anyone's comments..... I have quoted some and asked for explanations...

Yet, if you have to share the attention w/ any man that isn't a member of your 'Yes man club' then your benevolent concern for the burning issues that threaten our precious community seem to be, uh...Oh that's right, you just find another city to harass.

We disagree on what the "burning issues are". I think the issues between the ladies and the guy outed needed to be handled BY the ladies in a manner outside of the threads.... I believe the BURNING ISSUE is that personal information was too easily shared and misused by people that did not have any of the facts.....

You folks conducted an inquisition, tried and convicted a guy and dealt out an unacceptable punishment in my mind.


Lastly,this is where I will have to explain 'a figure of speech' and how it was used in the alerts thread. Accusations have been bandied about (by Whispers) that various eccie members were encouraging others to commit violence or 'retaliate' against this poor and now victimized lad.

I am first and foremost a US CITIZEN and though I do not believe in vigilante justice (although during my divorce it was a tempting proposition, but, I digress) I DO BELIEVE THAT WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY TO ANSWER TO OUR CONSCIENCE.

If my neighbor was overheard making 'anti-American' violent threats and I knew they already had an assault charge, in their recent past I wouldn't NEED someone's permission to file anonymous report to the FBI or HLS.

The point being made to Stinky...er...Slinkky was that he himself had opened himself up to just that - that we, as patriotic Americans had the right to act on our conscience, if we felt his comments or behavior were a threat.

His behavior of theft +violent history+taunts+flagrant disrespect for women (and the men here)+ threats of violence combined w/ 'anti-american' rhetoric = Not your standard eccie hobbyist. He threw himself under the bus time and time again and it would be every providers/womans prerogative to protect other women from this man or others like him.

Poke a dog or cat enough with a stick and it will scratch and bite.... It does not mean the dog or cat was prone to doing so before being provoked...

May I ask who has been poking you with the proverbial stick?


Geez. I always hear that guys HATE drama...but, guess not!

Besos, I no longer drink, but would love to buy you coffee some time

Aphrodite
Originally Posted by Aphrodite


All of your opinions... which were fed to "the lawyer"...... are based on 2nd hand information and the observation of how someone that was probably rather immature to begin with reacted to so much negative attention..... None of you, outside the couple of ladies, experienced any of those behaviors from the guy in person. He as described as creepy by a lady that later said enough was enough...... and a couple of ladies did not collect up front and got stiffed according to them..... Nothing proven...


Sooner or later staff will finish dissecting the thread and we will probably get an opinion on what the view of the board is on the matter...I think we will all learn something at that time.
Mike Vronsky's Avatar
They were BOTH wrong.
Stop calling her..... IJS Originally Posted by Still Looking
Good one.

That's a question you ladies should be discussing somewhere else...
Originally Posted by Whispers
I can not comment or argue any further about why this provider should not have been singled out due to rules, but if you aren't privy to certain areas you can't know the whole picture.

And I meant who's going to protect the provider after the fact, assuming this stuff is all true? He may retaliate against her.
While it may be true it could have been prevented, no one deserves to be "terrorized" allegedly.

I don't want to promote this stuff, so I have nothing else to say about it. I've already beat it to death.

On a lighter note- Hoe about this weather?
Whispers's Avatar
On a lighter note- Hoe about this weather? Originally Posted by Jane Doe
Really!..... Where are the ads from ladies offering Tomato Soup and Grilled Cheese Sammiches when we have the perfect weather for it?

No Warm up by the fire place ads.......
Whispers's Avatar
Whispers, Why? Are you rehashing it then?
You are making yourself look like a monster in our eyes!

LOL..... In some of your eyes..... In others I kind of like seeing my reflection...

You have started two alternate threads to a post that has long since been removed!
You are having your lunch handed to you on a silver platter, but still you shout 'Wolf'!

Who has been handing me my lunch? I missed lunch today.. They are failing miserably and I am hungry!
Hey SL... Did you get your lunch handed to you today?

People have stopped coming to your rescue when they realize that you are encouraging bad behavior on the client's behalf!
Here is your Graceful Exit! Originally Posted by SexiLexi333
Recap.....

- Points issued I assume.....
- Your shill Attorney account GreyBuffalo banned....
- Toyz Banned


Outside of who has banned you might want to look at who is NOT banned.... I;m not referring to myself....

LOL...I would but, I don't have time tonight Originally Posted by Aphrodite

You shouldn't have wasted so much time on me... You were totally ineffective. I would think you would know that by now.

It's not my posts getting edited.....
I'm not earning points
I'm not the guy that got banned....
I'm not the person behind that banned "attorney" account

Whispers you should be ashamed for attacking Frankie Originally Posted by TequilaBesos69


How is that research going? Have you determined what it looks like when I am really "attacking" someone?

..

Originally Posted by RandB fan

It helps to UNDERSTAND the rules.... Breaking them is one way to get schooled in their meaning.
Still Looking's Avatar
LOL...I would but, I don't have time tonight Originally Posted by Aphrodite
Seems like a lady as well spoken as you should be worth the wait!
Again I never threatened anyone, someone coming to look for me in my own private residential area and getting hurt is self defense
Providers actually go out in public with Still Looking? Can they not afford their own P.F. Chang's?
Still Looking's Avatar
Again I never threatened anyone, someone coming to look for me in my own private residential area and getting hurt is self defense Originally Posted by kingman
I bet your mail man is as nervous as a cat in a room full of rocking chairs.
Still Looking's Avatar
Providers actually go out in public with Still Looking? Can they not afford their own P.F. Chang's? Originally Posted by Pussy Control
Now see that's exactly the wrong attitude. A gentleman would never allow a lady to pay for dinner. Key word being gentleman.