From A LEGIT Hookers POV

Point Of View, NOT Personally Owned Vehicle! lol

This topic right here really irks me. It makes no sense to me and probably never will, but I witnessed it happen again today and needless to say, I couldn't hold back....

Please note, I'm serious when I ask this, WTF is wrong with some of you guys?? You have been baited-n-switched, yet you still do a review with a 'YES' recommendation? Essentially, you have been lied to and played for a fool... sigh.. I'm genuinely befuddled. Most Guys respond with, "I was thinking with my little head" or "She was really nice even though the pics were not of her' or "She used fake pics for security reasons" Buuuulllshit. Bullshit bullshit. Then, to add insult to injury, you slaphappy push-overs do a fuckin review on the bogus hooker with a YES recommendation. The next thing I know, I see all these photo-robbing skanks on P411 and datecheck and alas they then bring their fabricated ads and pics to Eccie because, obviously, some guys here give these bogus hookers glowing endorsements, sooo.. why not?! lol


Am I missing something? Anyone??.. Originally Posted by Gemma34

Gemma, I LOVE a woman who "gets it" and your posts have put you at the top of my to-do list!

The Big or Biggest QUESTION is how does she know what was written in the ROS...
come on MODS...
REALLY...... Originally Posted by Helicopter206

Oh, hey pet. You are a weird little fella. You pm with compliments then you suggest I might be reading the ros because I create this thread about guys giving hookers a yes review although the ho is using stolen photos??.. You research hookers daily and give complete reports on here, yet you cannot locate where I received my intel for my thread? No worries pet, we all know you lack certain elements.

Just because you are a perplexed boob, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Have proof before you accuse us hookers of shit you silly silly imp.

Yea, come on mods, Helicopter wants your help in banning all the hookers on this fuckin board! BABAHAHAHABAhahahabahhahaha

P.s. Did you really just like your own post, log off and like it as a guest too??

Are you for real right now? I mean we CAN READ contrary to popular belief. I hate to break it to you, but not everything is a conspiracy. Originally Posted by Emmie

LMAO! Oh thank you Emmie. I needed a good laugh girl.

Eventually they'll earn their poor reputation. No worries. Originally Posted by Eva Damita

Very true Eva.

Gemma, I LOVE a woman who "gets it" and your posts have put you at the top of my to-do list! Originally Posted by Zeeba Neighba

Well I appreciate the compliment hun! I'm not sure I get it, but I'm trying to lol!

Gemma,
Three in a row for hammering a nail square on the head.
I couldn't resist carpenter humor.

Just because you are a perplexed boob, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Originally Posted by Gemma34

BTW, the new site and pics of you 'perplexing' your own boobs are nice.

Oh, hey pet. You are a weird little fella. You pm with compliments then you suggest I might be reading the ros because I create this thread about guys giving hookers a yes review although the ho is using stolen photos??.. You research hookers daily and give complete reports on here, yet you cannot locate where I received my intel for my thread? No worries pet, we all know you lack certain elements.

Just because you are a perplexed boob, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Have proof before you accuse us hookers of shit you silly silly imp.

Yea, come on mods, Helicopter wants your help in banning all the hookers on this fuckin board! BABAHAHAHABAhahahabahhahaha

P.s. Did you really just like your own post, log off and like it as a guest too?? Originally Posted by Gemma34

great post Gemma

The Big or Biggest QUESTION is how does she know what was written in the ROS...
come on MODS...
REALLY...... Originally Posted by Helicopter206

Guys not alerting others of a bait and switch bp scams, or gemma having access to ROS (which has been determined by The Inspector through reading gemmas post??).

Which is the "BIGGEST QUESTION"????

I have never showed up and the lady was not the one I expected. I've been burned in other ways but never that way. Bait n switch happens when u answer a bp ad without researching and confirming it is for real. I have the exact same reaction to this as Gemma. WTF are guys
Thinking??

Want to meet the dude who may have a gun in the bathroom?

Want to introduce your buddies on the board to a reckless desparate lady who wants to scam money from guys???

Never answer a BP ad where u have no confirmation she is for real. Never. It can get u hurt, and u will ALWAYS be disappointed. (I'm not saying don't see ladies who advertise on bp).

If u make the mistake of falling for a bait and switch, don't repeat, and as Gemma suggests, don't write a positive review or u are setting up the next guy.

I think guys do what gemma suggests mostly because they are seeking a bargain. What is better? 250 to 300 an hour once with a professional who is real, good, and discreet, or two bait N switches for the bargain price of 150 an hour each??

I am paying for safety and discretion too.

If your main source of hobby dates is bp, then u are taking way more risks than you should.

Thanks Gemma. Good post

Every hobbyist has the right to say whether the services were worth his time and money. If she is attractive and provides good service, and as long as he informs the reader that the pics were not of her, then what's wrong with a "Yes" recommendation? The reader is informed and can decide for himself whether to patronize a provider who doesn't use her real pics.

I remember Layla was one of the most popular bodyrub providers ever to grace the old forum, and virtually everyone knew she used "approximated" photos to maintain her anonymity.

I've been to some providers whose "real life" appearance wasn't even close to their professional studio pics--to the point where the difference was as far apart as some "approximated" photos I've seen.

If the review doesn't disclose the fact and is thereby misleading, then that's a different problem.

I'm not condoning the provider using fake photos. But I'm not prepared to call a hobbyist a fool for giving a "Yes" recommendation for the services of someone he found to be pleasant, attractive, and enjoyable, despite the fact that the pics of her weren't real.

great post Gemma Originally Posted by nineninanine

BTW, the new site and pics of you 'perplexing' your own boobs are nice.

Originally Posted by zeejoe

Not arguing with nine, but I like zeejoe's picture post better! Yum, Gemma!

Damn, finally someone says what I feel!! Some people's reviews truly leave me baffled and at a loss for words!! As another legitimate hooker, I also feel like some men give a yes review out of fear of repercussions of what might happen to them, such as blackmail or being black listed. I also feel like some newbies are needing a reference and they know a no review would probably lead them to not be able to use that provider. Those are just my two cents for what it's worth. Originally Posted by Emmie

I know just what you are saying. Personally, I do not like a lady to feel bad; even if I am disappointed with her personally, I would not give a negative review provided she tried, or even joyfully attempted to provide good service.

For example: I do not appreciate tattoos, especially if someone has a lot of visible ones. But, most of the younger ladies have them today. I may not understand it, but my prejudice is my problem and I try to make the most of it. I have learned to ignore the small ones. In this example, I would rate the lady on her personality and her desire to make me happy. Even if one discovers a tattoo that was highly offensive. The woman should be rated on herself.

With the same reasoning: I enjoy spending time and conversation with a very intelligent lady. Should an encounter reveal that the lady is less than desired personally, a negative recommendation would not be warranted; it is my personal preference and should not have an effect on the evaluation.

The above being said, should there be problems with safety, cleanliness or negative attitude (you can make a long list if you like) that affected the encounter; a negative review would serve to advise others of a problem that they may wish to avoid.

The flip side of this question is the unjustified negative reviews I have seen by some guys who have the obvious intention of harming a ladies business. Just because the lady might not have met his demands for a perfect encounter is not a reason to attack her in a public discussion.

These ladies are people with emotions in a difficult business. With all but the most hardened, it is helpful to at least try to get to know them as a person. Recently I met a young lady for the first time. We had started to relax, when I asked if she would tell me about her baby. Hold the train while she brings out the pictures and talks about the most important thing in her life. That didn't change the encounter for me. After all: "Sex is between the ears as well as between the legs." - H.L. Newbold

JR

+1 JR.
So, from my perspective.
Once the safety, hygiene, and attitude are checked off what is left?
Personal views and ideology from both ends.
So, maybe the no's in reviews in such cases need always be clarified from both ends? Like a side bar thread discussion/statement rebuttal area where both sides can clearly, concisely attempt to explain. But only let it stand if both sides participate once and then the rest is as is.?
The ROS stays ROS though(period).
Ladies area (whatever that's called) stays that too.

The alternative is thus.
I'm cool! No matters

I know just what you are saying. Personally, I do not like a lady to feel bad; even if I am disappointed with her personally, I would not give a negative review provided she tried, or even joyfully attempted to provide good service.

For example: I do not appreciate tattoos, especially if someone has a lot of visible ones. But, most of the younger ladies have them today. I may not understand it, but my prejudice is my problem and I try to make the most of it. I have learned to ignore the small ones. In this example, I would rate the lady on her personality and her desire to make me happy. Even if one discovers a tattoo that was highly offensive. The woman should be rated on herself.

With the same reasoning: I enjoy spending time and conversation with a very intelligent lady. Should an encounter reveal that the lady is less than desired personally, a negative recommendation would not be warranted; it is my personal preference and should not have an effect on the evaluation.

The above being said, should there be problems with safety, cleanliness or negative attitude (you can make a long list if you like) that affected the encounter; a negative review would serve to advise others of a problem that they may wish to avoid.

The flip side of this question is the unjustified negative reviews I have seen by some guys who have the obvious intention of harming a ladies business. Just because the lady might not have met his demands for a perfect encounter is not a reason to attack her in a public discussion.

These ladies are people with emotions in a difficult business. With all but the most hardened, it is helpful to at least try to get to know them as a person. Recently I met a young lady for the first time. We had started to relax, when I asked if she would tell me about her baby. Hold the train while she brings out the pictures and talks about the most important thing in her life. That didn't change the encounter for me. After all: "Sex is between the ears as well as between the legs." - H.L. Newbold

JR Originally Posted by JRLawrence

Huh?
I am confused by what a Recommendation means?
I thought it meant:"would you see this hooker again?

so if a lady had tats(which you dont like)
isnt smart(which you dont like)
youd see her again?
and thus give a Recommendation YES
or you'd not see her again and still give a yes, because???
Makes me think of Consumer reports and how they give ratings and Recommendations

never do they say, I'd never use this product because of X Y Z, but I recommend you buy it!

Huh?
I am confused by what a Recommendation means?
I thought it meant:"would you see this hooker again?

so if a lady had tats(which you dont like)
isnt smart(which you dont like)
youd see her again?
and thus give a Recommendation YES
or you'd not see her again and still give a yes, because???
Makes me think of Consumer reports and how they give ratings and Recommendations

never do they say, I'd never use this product because of X Y Z, but I recommend you buy it! Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

Hmmm good post. And I agree. If i'm selling cars and I advertise jaguars but I actually sell hyundais would you still buy my Hyundai and give me a yes review ?? Depends on the sales pitch, yes?

I know just what you are saying. Personally, I do not like a lady to feel bad; even if I am disappointed with her personally, I would not give a negative review provided she tried, or even joyfully attempted to provide good service.

For example: I do not appreciate tattoos, especially if someone has a lot of visible ones. But, most of the younger ladies have them today. I may not understand it, but my prejudice is my problem and I try to make the most of it. I have learned to ignore the small ones. In this example, I would rate the lady on her personality and her desire to make me happy. Even if one discovers a tattoo that was highly offensive. The woman should be rated on herself.

With the same reasoning: I enjoy spending time and conversation with a very intelligent lady. Should an encounter reveal that the lady is less than desired personally, a negative recommendation would not be warranted; it is my personal preference and should not have an effect on the evaluation.

The above being said, should there be problems with safety, cleanliness or negative attitude (you can make a long list if you like) that affected the encounter; a negative review would serve to advise others of a problem that they may wish to avoid.

The flip side of this question is the unjustified negative reviews I have seen by some guys who have the obvious intention of harming a ladies business. Just because the lady might not have met his demands for a perfect encounter is not a reason to attack her in a public discussion.

These ladies are people with emotions in a difficult business. With all but the most hardened, it is helpful to at least try to get to know them as a person. Recently I met a young lady for the first time. We had started to relax, when I asked if she would tell me about her baby. Hold the train while she brings out the pictures and talks about the most important thing in her life. That didn't change the encounter for me. After all: "Sex is between the ears as well as between the legs." - H.L. Newbold

JR Originally Posted by JRLawrence

.... Intrigued. And I actually can understand your point. At least you have one.