No Stars and Bars but a Rainbow Flag Would Be Just Dandy

Go stick your fucking head in a toilet, you goddamn idiot. You're the absolute dumbest motherfucking shitstain I've ever seen. Your shtick is old as the crust in your fucking underwear. And you're too goddamn dumb to come up with anything else. You're nothing but a dumbass tag-along cocksucker. Why don't you go and console Lusty Tard, he's getting his ass reamed again. Originally Posted by WombRaider

And you should be SOOO happy now that you an shammy can now "be legal" !! But typical lying liberal, your STILL pissed off at the world for whatever perceived slight that your peter-pounded mind can think up. All those years of unresolved "Daddy issues", Mommy issues", rejections by would be women AND MEN suitors have really gotten you tormented, don't they peter puffer. And my "shtick" must hit close to home with you woomby / undercunt / rusty balloon knot / wanna-be jalapeno sucker. Cry all you want peter puffer, I'm not going away. So when are your "nuptials" with shammy anyway ? Did you order your cake with "white cream" frosting or with the "dark brown" frosting ? Will you both be wearing your rainbow thongs to the ceremony ? Who will be the "husband" and who will be "the bitch" ? Seems like you prefer to be the bitch the woomby / undercunt / rusty balloon knot / wanna-be jalapeno sucker !!! WAAAAA WAAAAAA

Thank you, eccie dipshit emeritus. Ask your nurse to wipe the spittle off your chin.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

Maybe she can change his Depends for him too. He can always use the "soiled" Depends to polish that award that he's so proud of getting-DSOTY !!!!

You were the one who mentioned granting rights that weren't contained in the constitution. Women's suffrage was not contained in the Bill of Rights. I'm not walking back shit, you fucking shitheel. I meant exactly what the fuck I said, based on your statement. The only thing you know for sure is you haven't seen your fucking dick without using a mirror in about 17 years. You notice how you didn't make a fucking point in that entire bout of verbal diarrhea that you spewed? Because you don't have one, shitstain. You fucked up. You said we were giving people rights that weren't in the constitution. Well, that motherfucker has been amended 17 goddamn times, after the initial 10. I include that last part so your old ass doesn't get confused and try to accuse me of saying something I didn't. So the 17 that came afterwards, you are against them? They weren't in the constitution originally. You're a fucking disgrace and have become laughable. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You already had your lying ass handed to you, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. The Nineteenth Amendment is part of the Constitution, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, and it dealt with the de facto issue of disenfranchised women, because the Constitution of 1789 did not de jure prevent women from voting.

Wyoming allowed women to vote in 1869, and New Jersey allowed women who met the property requirements to vote in 1797, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, aren't you the jackass arguing in another thread that "de facto" is irrelevant and can out of hand be dismissed because it isn't "official"?

You already had your lying ass handed to you, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. The Nineteenth Amendment is part of the Constitution, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, and it dealt with the de facto issue of disenfranchised women, because the Constitution of 1789 did not de jure prevent women from voting.

Wyoming allowed women to vote in 1869, and New Jersey allowed women who met the property requirements to vote in 1797, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, aren't you the jackass arguing in another thread that "de facto" is irrelevant and can out of hand be dismissed because it isn't "official"? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The freelance sewer rat from Arkansas needs a little extra time to reply. He is looking up the meanings of de facto and de jure while he smears cortisone-10 on his sore bleeding ass. The grubered Odumbo minion flunked both Latin and Constitutional law at Dogpatch Community College.

.

The freelance sewer rat from Arkansas needs a little extra time to reply. He needs to look up the meanings of de facto and de jure while he is nursing his sore ass. The grubered Odumbo minion flunked both Latin and Constitutional law at Dogpatch Community College

. Originally Posted by lustylad

All of those hours he was putting in at the truck stop glory holes and all the noise he was making at "work" must have made it just to tough for him to study. He can sure "study" a dick though !

Venomous left wing hatemonger. We don't want to be forced to bake cakes for people and all of a sudden we are the bad guys. Originally Posted by DSK

You're a fucking fairy cake baker?

You're a fucking fairy cake baker? Originally Posted by WTF

Yes, because everyone in the cake business is required to bake cakes for fairies - or get a dick up their ass when they go to prison.

(BTW, how often did that happen to you in the joint?)

Jumping bejesus - you are the dumbest mofo on the planet! My jaw drops at the sheer depth of your stupidity. The only point you've made is how much you enjoy being flagellated over and over for the same fuckup. Do you really want me to beat you again? I feel like I'm kicking a half-dead jackass on the ground. Go start another thread and post something stupid. Don't make me keep handing you your ass again and again for the same offense!

Yes dickhead, our constitution has 27 amendments. Every schoolboy knows that. When you say "women voting isn't in the constitution" you are 100% wrong. As in 100% incorrect. As in 100% misinformed. As in stupider than a 5th grade civics student. And let's be honest - you didn't say "women voting WASN'T in the ORIGINAL constitution", did you? Nope, you said "women voting ISN'T in the constitution". Meaning now. So you obviously know nothing about the history of women's suffrage. But don't fret - there are plenty of other topics about which you know nothing. Why make an ass of yourself trying to save face on this one?

I mean, you would be more convincing trying to tell everyone you don't have multiple handles. Ooops - you had your ass handed to you on that one too, dintcha?




. Originally Posted by lustylad

Let me school you, fuckwad. You said in your post that we were giving people rights that weren't in the constitution. A woman's right to vote was not in the original constitution. So, that right was given to them AFTER the original constitution was written, addressing your contention of giving people rights that weren't in the constitution. That right was not in the constitution and was later given to them, so what else would I be referring to except the original constitution? Nice try, dickwad. You just aren't smart enough. You keep trying, but you just end up in knots.

Here's what the freelance faggot from Arkansas posted before having his ass handed to him:

Women voting isn't in the Constitution.... Originally Posted by WombRaider

Then someone directed his attention to the 19th Amendment...

Lookee what the Arkansas sewer rat is posting now:

A woman's right to vote was not in the original constitution... Originally Posted by WombRaider

Ooops! Undercunt knows he fucked up but he's too much of a lying shit to admit it! He would rather be laughed at again and again! Now he says "isn't" means "wasn't"! Good one, sewer rat! Wriggle and squirm some more! It's fun to watch a cornered rat search feverishly for a way out!

.

Let me school you, fuckwad. You said in your post that we were giving people rights that weren't in the constitution. A woman's right to vote was not in the original constitution. So, that right was given to them AFTER the original constitution was written, addressing your contention of giving people rights that weren't in the constitution. That right was not in the constitution and was later given to them, so what else would I be referring to except the original constitution? Nice try, dickwad. You just aren't smart enough. You keep trying, but you just end up in knots. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Cite where the Constitution with only the first ten amendments disenfranchised women, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, aren't you, in another thread, the jackass that's arguing that "de facto" circumstances have no "official" import or consequences?

JL is late for his anger management class again...

Cite where the Constitution with only the first ten amendments disenfranchised women, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, aren't you, in another thread, the jackass that's arguing that "de facto" circumstances have no "official" import or consequences? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The right for women to vote is not in the original constitution. Are you saying it is? Art you saying the denial of voting rights is NOT being disenfranchised? You're more grubered than you realize.

The right for women to vote is not in the original constitution. Are you saying it is? Art you saying the denial of voting rights is NOT being disenfranchised? You're more grubered than you realize. Originally Posted by WombRaider

The Constitution of 1789, including the first ten amendments, in no manner proscribes a woman's right to vote any more than it stipulates that only men can vote, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; hence, per the Constitution, both sexes are dealt with identically in that regard.

It was left to the states to determine voter qualification. I think Wyoming was the first to allow women to vote in the late 1800s. There is no right to vote for anyone in the Constitution.

The Constitution of 1789, including the first ten amendments, in no manner proscribes a woman's right to vote any more than it stipulates that only men can vote, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; hence, per the Constitution, both sexes are dealt with identically in that regard. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Then why the need for the 19th amendment?

"In the early history of the U.S., most states allowed only white male adult property owners to vote."

You're doing what you always do. You've had your ass handed to you on the original subject, so you're shifting the argument now.