Was the Optimator right after all?

Who are you calling a discourse!?!

It is ON, HL.

IT IS ON!!! Originally Posted by emptywallet

SO BE IT!!!
*DONS FAT SUIT*

image.jpeg

You mean those reams of Iambic pentameter text to her were for naught? Originally Posted by Stanfeld

+1 - With a response like that, I bet your sweet nothings were veritable ODES! How could she not care???

Or I guess that you texted to him???

Nobody had a "2nd" Handle. I was told that I could have my same account, and run agency but would lose my Premium Access. I said "OK." The Guidelines specifically state a Provider can have an assistant.

According to the guidelines here: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=19347

8th Bullet Point: "Some verified providers may have a "helper" This is defined as someone who you are allowing to access your account to post your ad on a weekly basis. This is fine at ECCIE Worldwide, however we do require that you request approval from staff prior to allowing someone this access. This will be approved on a case-by-case basis. In any case where you request a male member to assist you with your ad, conditional approval may be given and your settings/usergroup adjusted to disable access to the female-only forums. This is especially important, since you would be placing your account access in jeopardy by allowing another party to access your account without prior staff approval."

So it stands to reason a Hobbyist can create an Agency and run it like he would do for a female he was helping.

Nobody had a "2nd" Handle. I was told that I could have my same account, and run agency but would lose my Premium Access. I said "OK." The Guidelines specifically state a Provider can have an assistant.

According to the guidelines here: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=19347

8th Bullet Point: "Some verified providers may have a "helper" This is defined as someone who you are allowing to access your account to post your ad on a weekly basis. This is fine at ECCIE Worldwide, however we do require that you request approval from staff prior to allowing someone this access. This will be approved on a case-by-case basis. In any case where you request a male member to assist you with your ad, conditional approval may be given and your settings/usergroup adjusted to disable access to the female-only forums. This is especially important, since you would be placing your account access in jeopardy by allowing another party to access your account without prior staff approval."

So it stands to reason a Hobbyist can create an Agency and run it like he would do for a female he was helping. Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

TAF, not sure why you keep defending this since you already folded the Hen House at the first sign of trouble. If you were so sure things were on the up and up, why did you close up shop?

The guideline does talk about making ads, not making reviews or any other part of accessing a VP's account. Or is this your calculated way to say that you are still a "helper"?

Things were so much better when you were just finding new talent, writing kick ass reviews, and adding these ladies to the community. Maybe things were always this way and I was just too naive to know the difference.

Cheers!

I'm not defending it, I'm shining a spotlight on an issue and being transparent. As long as people keep putting out misinformation, I'm going to correct them. Facts matter to some people and the more people know about the Guidelines, Rules, and just common human decency (paradox in this type of world), the better everyone will be.

I already explained in another thread why Hen House was closed. The bullying, which is against the Guidelines here: http://www.eccie.net/announcement.php?f=5

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct."

There was too much harassment and the girls within the agency, and even myself were getting uncomfortable with the loose accusations in a public forum. And also the outting of Members' privacy is atrocious.

If you want to determine if we are in a better situation now or before when I was introducing girls, just look at the net gain or net loss of providers. We have basically seen a net loss of 4 girls in a week. When I was introducing them, most wouldn't stick around very long for various reasons and complaints against you guys, and who do you think they complained to?

Then answer the question. Who was the modtard that told you it was ok to have an agency account and a hobbyist account, and write reviews of your own whores (without PA credit)........since you have nothing to hide.

I'm not defending it, I'm shining a spotlight on an issue and being transparent. As long as people keep putting out misinformation, I'm going to correct them. Facts matter to some people and the more people know about the Guidelines, Rules, and just common human decency (paradox in this type of world), the better everyone will be.

I already explained in another thread why Hen House was closed. The bullying, which is against the Guidelines here: http://www.eccie.net/announcement.php?f=5

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct."

There was too much harassment and the girls within the agency, and even myself were getting uncomfortable with the loose accusations in a public forum. And also the outting of Members' privacy is atrocious.

If you want to determine if we are in a better situation now or before when I was introducing girls, just look at the net gain or net loss of providers. We have basically seen a net loss of 4 girls in a week. When I was introducing them, most wouldn't stick around very long for various reasons and complaints against you guys, and who do you think they complained to? Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

Question. Why do you find the need to continually have to explain your actions? This is a fucking whore forum? These cock suckers are worse than judge Judy. It's nobody's business! If they didn't like your first explanation Fuck um. Fuck um in the ear! If they don't like it, Fuck um in the other ear! Do your thing player.

Question. Why do you find the need to continually have to explain your actions? This is a fucking whore forum? These cock suckers are worse than judge Judy. It's nobody's business! If they didn't like your first explanation Fuck um. Fuck um in the ear! If they don't like it, Fuck um in the other ear! Do your thing player. Originally Posted by whatacrock

+1

Hobbylover, it wasn't stupidity that led me to write a review of someone in the agency. I simply did not know, and even asked if that was kosher prior to even posting reviews. I was told by a Mod that it didn't appear to violate any rules, but that I wouldn't be granted PA credit. With that understanding, I posted.... I don't do stupid things. I calculate. Originally Posted by texxxassfilms

It was a huge error. You are a part of that agency thus you lose the ability to review your own agency. This should have never been allowed from the get go. Obviously there's a tremendous conflict of interest with this.

This should have never been allowed from the get go. Obviously there's a tremendous conflict of interest with this. Originally Posted by Mojojo

And it took a drunk fucking ass hole to figure that out! Amazing, simply fucking amazing that Films and EG couldn't see it! Maybe because they were looking with the little blind head!

And it took a drunk fucking ass hole to figure that out! Originally Posted by Optimator

Well in my defense this shit keeps me on the edge of insanity....every now and then that sip helps me come back.

He is referring to himself as the drunck

He is referring to himself as the drunck Originally Posted by dearhunter

You caught that too?... Maybe Mojojo had a sip or two too many?

You caught that too?... Maybe Mojojo had a sip or two too many? Originally Posted by Whispers

Your mom had a sip to many and she goes to college.