You make some very valid points. To answer your question, Yes it's part of our job to show excitement and an interest in you guys. For me it's not about physical attraction. I get turned on, excited and attracted to anyone who is prompt, respectful and has no problem with coming to have a good time. That makes up 98% of the gents I see, so more than 9/10 my date and I don't have the lack of chemistry problems. I can count on one hand how many people I didn't have chemistry with, but they still came back to see me more than once. Sometimes, being a provider we over think way too much and it's in our nature to want to please and if a gent isn't reacting the way we think they should to whatever is going on at that time, whether it be a conversation, an exchange of pleasantries or even a position we are playing in at that time, we may feel the chemistry isn't there or the date is not into us. The same goes for you guys. I've had some guys tell me that they saw "X" and she wasn't as vocal or didn't seem like she wanted to talk, so the gent assumed that "X" wasn't into him which caused the mood and chemistry to fade. Some people are just socially awkward and hard to communicate with but that doesn't mean that I would ever give any less than the best that I could to make sure that they have a great time!
I don't know whether it was lack of chemistry or if she was having a bad day or maybe he was just really picky. The way that she explained her side of the story sounded as if they just didn't click. I do hear very often that guys will give a YES recommendation, but inside the ROS it sounds as if it would be a NO. I think sometimes guys are afraid of the backlash they will get from the provider and other gentleman that favor the provider so they give a YES when it clearly should be a NO.
I strongly feel that a lack of chemistry shouldn't result in a NO recommendation and as you stated a good reviewer would show facts of lack of chemistry, unfortunately everyone does not present those facts. In the situation you described it sounds like there was something that was more than just lack of chemistry.
I understand your point of view, but I have some comments. First, isn't it your job to at least feign interest and excitement? Isn't it part of the escort GFE shtick, that the lady is into you? I understand that only a small percentage of your customers are truly interesting or attractive, but don't you have an obligation to fool those who don't make the top echelon of customers?
Second, how do we know that it was just a lack of chemistry and not that the provider wasn't giving it her all? The guys who write good reviews will provide the facts that show the lack of chemistry and will admit that was the case, but some providers are just not into their jobs but the result is the same as a "lack of chemistry".
And finally, why shouldn't guys know when there is a lack of chemistry? It is as important to prospective clients as the size of her bust and the color of her hair. Just this week I passed on a beautiful agency girl who too many guys said she either seemed tired or there was a lack of chemistry. I am getting too seasoned (that's a kind way of saying old) to believe that I could prompt a better session from her, so I passed, with regrets.
Those are just a few thoughts...
Originally Posted by awl4knot