Serious question for the providers

Physical Description: Tall, black hair, pics seem to be accurate, some acne on face, significant smoke smell, nice, friendly,
Recommendation: No

Where is all that you explained?

Dorfy....

I in no way exposed ROS.

I read his review and I read her response.

I explained...clearly...that I believe there should be a place to explain the NO.

As receivers we suffer no consequence or responsibility for an underwhelming experience. The Provider carries all.

If a no is offered it should be followed with an explanation for why so that thos eof us who have NO access to ROS can make an educated decision about how we will move forward with said provider.

If some one says Yes...I can read the alphabet, the time provided and the $$$ considered and make an educated choice.

If I read the alphabet and the $$$ and the time and a NO with zero explanation I am left confused. The format has a flaw built in that exposes providers to unexplained negativity....and from my stand point that is the clear case here.

Once again...all due respect....explained clearly.

Enjoy!

Dorfy....

I in no way exposed ROS.

I read his review and I read her response.

I explained...clearly...that I believe there should be a place to explain the NO.

As receivers we suffer no consequence or responsibility for an underwhelming experience. The Provider carries all.

If a no is offered it should be followed with an explanation for why so that thos eof us who have NO access to ROS can make an educated decision about how we will move forward with said provider.

If some one says Yes...I can read the alphabet, the time provided and the $$$ considered and make an educated choice.

If I read the alphabet and the $$$ and the time and a NO with zero explanation I am left confused. The format has a flaw built in that exposes providers to unexplained negativity....and from my stand point that is the clear case here.

Once again...all due respect....explained clearly.

Enjoy! Originally Posted by Mrpracticle

Then why can't I see what you said he explained in the review?

I have no idea....new contacts?

No because you are revealing information off the review

I have 20/20 vision don't play with me

I have been very clear. Within all the guidelines.

Perhaps you are trolling.

I have been very clear. Within all the guidelines.

Perhaps you are trolling. Originally Posted by Mrpracticle

Then copy & paste the information you qouted from the review

Because he didnt describe the meeting on the review...

That is my point. He gave the mandatory alphabet description of the meeting. He gave a no recommendation. He did not explain why he gave a no because there isn't a clear format for that. I see that as a flaw in the system.

I really don't know how I can explain it any better for you. Maybe you should read my opinion again and copy and paste the word, sentence or paragraph I wrote that you are fixating on.

Dorthy, why you trolling tho?..

Sorry Gemma
Dorfy's not trolling.
She's just being blunt with someone.

What's 12 posts on 3 pages?

Freedom of eccie is what it's called.

You know what Savannah if it was about you this thread would be 18 pages long by now, 16 pages by you only.

You know what Savannah if it was about you this thread would be 18 pages long by now, 16 pages by you only. Originally Posted by Emmie

And don't ever forget it!!
MUAH
Good to see you got your pompoms back out though