The Lying Game -- coming to a debate near you!

That is illogical even by your low standards you pathetic lying scumbag.

That is illogical even by your low standards you pathetic lying scumbag. Originally Posted by Old-T

Your drunk-ass needs to just keep rationalizing your spittle and vomit ladened navel, Old-THUMPER.

Funny how, in this passage, Politifact willingly "guesses" at hildebeest's motives to defend her, but readily dismisses such rationalizations if they are harmful to hildebest.

"So it’s possible Clinton had intelligence about possible protests, rather than an unconnected terrorist attack, in mind when she met with the families. But this is, again, something we likely won’t ever know." (Politifact)

Your drunk-ass needs to just keep rationalizing your spittle and vomit ladened navel, Old-THUMPER.

Funny how, in this passage, Politifact willingly "guesses" at hildebeest's motives to defend her, but readily dismisses such rationalizations if they are harmful to hildebest.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Did I defend that? Please show me where I did.

Otherwise, why the hell are you bringing it up here?

Did I defend that? Please show me where I did.

Otherwise, why the hell are you bringing it up here? Originally Posted by Old-T

You need to prove how Politifact is justified in using a non-existent "investigation" as an excuse for not giving a ruling, Old-THUMPER. Until your drunk-ass does that, Old-THUMPER, you don't have a substantive point.

I don't consider Trump a piece of shit, you do. He has a chance to win and supports most things I do. So I'm not a hypocrite. You're a fucking idiot voting for a candidate that has no chance. The more he shows up in the media he makes an ass out of himself. He's not a true Libertarian, neither is Weld. Did you see him sticking his tongue out? Aleppo? Clueless? Originally Posted by bambino

Trump is a RINO, does he support cocksucking like you do?

You need to prove how Politifact is justified in using a non-existent "investigation" as an excuse for not giving a ruling, Old-THUMPER. Until your drunk-ass does that, Old-THUMPER, you don't have a substantive point. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I need to do no such thing. You don't get to pick what topic I have to discuss--but I am a nice, kindly person so I will give you another chance. You do not deserve it, but I'm just a nice guy.

--YOU prove why liking vanilla ice cream is morrally inferior to liking chocolate ice cream

--One you do, I will give you my opinion on the second point you posted

Both those are equally unconnected to your a surd conclusion that withholding an assessment in the absence of information is a liberal bias.

IBIdiot, the grand inquisitor!

LMAO @ DOTY (original recipe)

Trump is a RINO, does he support cocksucking like you do? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

I don't think Trump is a Rino. But you're a senior advisor in Asswipe's cocksucker Harum.

I need to do no such thing. You don't get to pick what topic I have to discuss--but I am a nice, kindly person so I will give you another chance. You do not deserve it, but I'm just a nice guy.

--YOU prove why liking vanilla ice cream is morrally inferior to liking chocolate ice cream

--One you do, I will give you my opinion on the second point you posted

Both those are equally unconnected to your a surd conclusion that withholding an assessment in the absence of information is a liberal bias. Originally Posted by Old-T

What's unnconnected here are the synapses in your alcoholic brain, Old-THUMPER. And 'yes', to have a substantve point, your drunk-ass does need to justify why Politifact is refusing to make a ruling based on a non-existent investigation and why they would call the parents of Benghazi victims liars when Politifact denies hildebeest lied -- when everyone knows hildebeest had already previously lied -- about the video tape, Old-THUMPER. Until the many such descrepencies at Politifact are resolved, it's a bullshit comparison to claim that, per Politifact, hildebeest hasn't lied more that Trump, Old-THUMPER.

What's unnconnected here are the synapses in your alcoholic brain, Old-THUMPER. And 'yes', to have a substantve point, your drunk-ass does need to justify why Politifact is refusing to make a ruling based on a non-existent investigation and why they would call the parents of Benghazi victims liars when Politifact denies hildebeest lied -- when everyone knows hildebeest had already previously lied -- about the video tape, Old-THUMPER. Until the many such descrepencies at Politifact are resolved, it's a bullshit comparison to claim that, per Politifact, hildebeest hasn't lied more that Trump, Old-THUMPER.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Sorry, you lose again IBDunce.

I do not need to justify their overall pro or anti Clinton numbers--I never supported (or denounced) them. That is YOUR brier patch.

Clinton lies. Trump Buffoons. IBBlithers.


By the way, remember that by your own rules you need to defend chocolate ice cream. Why haven't you done so?!? Until you do, nothing you have to say is valid!

Sorry, you lose again IBDunce.

I do not need to justify their overall pro or anti Clinton numbers--I never supported (or denounced) them. That is YOUR brier patch.

Clinton lies. Trump Buffoons. IBBlithers.


By the way, remember that by your own rules you need to defend chocolate ice cream. Why haven't you done so?!? Until you do, nothing you have to say is valid! Originally Posted by Old-T

Your besotted ass failed again to explain why Politifact -- by not ruling -- is giving hildebeest a pass on obvious lies, Old-THUMPER, while many of your ilk stupidly want to flaunt Politifact's biased rulings as a valid measure for comparison.

I don't think. Originally Posted by bambino

I agree with you for once.

I agree with you for once. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

That's not what I said Retarded Lenny. 1st lieutenant in Asswipe's cocksucking Harum.

Your besotted ass failed again to explain why Politifact -- by not ruling -- is giving hildebeest a pass on obvious lies, Old-THUMPER, while many of your ilk stupidly want to flaunt Politifact's biased rulings as a valid measure for comparison. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I am sorry (actually I am not, I think it is absolutely hilarious) but you are not allowed to bring up that point until you address the moral inferiority of vanilla ice cream. Why do you not respond to the question? That is equally logical to you demanding I defend something other people said.

Of course if you can find where I have blanket approved of Politicact, that would suffice--but your lying self can't find any such comment by me. So prove the damn ice cream point--of continue to be ridiculed when you throw your typical two year old temper tantrum.

Rant on little man! Mommy will be down to put you to bed soon, so get all those stupid posts in before that.

I don't think Trump . Originally Posted by bambino

Are these your words?

That's not what I said Retarded Lenny. 1st lieutenant in Asswipe's cocksucking Harem . Originally Posted by bambino

Guess again cocksucker in chief.